Comments: Is the notion female superiority being imprinted on the younger generation?

Is the notion female superiority being imprinted on the younger generation?

Question: These days, it seems that the idea of female superiority is being encouraged and imprinted on the minds of children as they grow up. Do you think the next generation is being inundated with images encouraging the belief that women are superior? Please comment.
Created by: truthseeker at 10:06:08 PM, Saturday, May 08, 2004 EDT

Comments

I checked out the Copulins website. Wow! That could explain a lot of things. I think the reason this information is being covered up is pretty obvious. It will completely destroy the myth of male power.

SarahMay 10 2004 1:18pm

I think its true, we got all these little charlies angels girls running around Hi-ya! but women are stressing the point so much on this site its getting old, I mean the next poll will be called "Was God drunk when he created men?" and he probably wasn't but we are now.

JoeMay 17 2004 7:52pm

Was God drunk? Silly! We all know she doesn't drink!

AnonymousMay 17 2004 9:00pm

She should when she looks at the world today.

AnonymousMay 19 2004 12:15am

This is not harmful, because it is the truth.

AnonymousMay 24 2004 10:03pm

Female Superiority isn't a notion nor a believe, it's the truth.

AnonymousMay 25 2004 9:51am

Female superiority is not an 'idea', it is the way things are.

buffgirlMay 26 2004 5:39am

Women are superior...God made Adam and then made Eve for his helpmate...God is also referred to as man's helpmate...helpmate meaning someone to guide him in the right direction.

believerMay 28 2004 3:19am

The notion female superiority is being imprinted on everyone, not just the younger generation.

AnonymousMay 31 2004 9:47pm

Men will be living under the full authority of women for a long long time to come.

JMTJun 05 2004 11:14am

I have been in college administration for more than 30 years. As a woman I have seen enormous changes. Young women no run most campus organizations and male students routinely defer to their judgment. I recently oversaw a concert that was put on at the student union. The women ran the show and when one young man failed to complete his assigned task the leader of the group gave him a tongue lashing he won't soon forget. When she finished, he apologized and the meeting continued. That, in a nutshell, is the future.

DianeJun 08 2004 7:33am

Television Commercials often show a clever wife and a bumbling husband. Watch, you'll see.

TammiJun 08 2004 7:58am

I am a White Man!

White ManJun 08 2004 11:51am

The clever wife will lead the way. The celver wife will love her bumbling husband. The clever will run the house. The bumbling husband had better get used to it.

JMTJun 09 2004 5:23pm

My wife forces me to recognize her as the dominant and smart one. I guess she really is right. Women are smarter than men

husbandJun 09 2004 6:22pm

The women at work are aware of the fact they are faster thinkers, they've been discussing this for some time. It is pretty obvious they can accomplish more, and have fun doing it. They rub it in a lot, too.

BillJun 13 2004 10:04am

The media has a lot to do with the fact women are presented as superior. Charlie's Angels, La Femme Nikita, Dark Angel, Xena, She Spies, and even mainstream shows constantly show women as vastly superior. This is part of a plan. Women have been dominating the entertainment industry more each year. They are the new wage earners and will have a growing influence on the images people see every day. Those images shape the way people think. The way people think will shape society.

MarkJun 24 2004 10:11pm

This is part of a plan. Ha ha ha, Mark. There is no "upper management plan"...it's just an industry giving society what it wants. If society didn't like seeing women in dominant roles, then the film industry wouldn't make such shows and movies. The mighty dollar rules.

HHJun 30 2004 8:58am

And women will control that mighty dillar.

DaveJul 01 2004 12:21am

Not only that, but they will control the economy also. The marketplace already recognizes women as the most important demographic to cater to. This is how it begins.

AnonymousJul 08 2004 8:59pm

Girl power!

AnonymousJul 24 2004 12:03pm

I want to make a comment to the woman who claimed to be an administrator for thirty years. You talk about that young woman who was in charge of a concert and how she deliberately abused a male because she was so drunk with power. It is just a shining example of how women can blast men for such bad chauvinistic and abusive behavior and then praise and justify it in themselves. He should have sued the broad for obvious harrassment based soley on his being male.

RandyAug 01 2004 5:21am

Until more than a few senators are female, will women really run this country.

GabrielAug 03 2004 7:58pm

In due time. Women are conquering the political system faster than people realize.

BrendaAug 14 2004 10:03pm

The younger generation is growing up surrounded by images of female superiority. In the media and popular culture women are portrayed as strong, intelligent, practical, independent, etc. but men are stupid bunglers or predatory criminals. A recent book by Catherine Young, Misandry, documents this. In movies and advertising men are replaced by hairless, pouting metrosexuals. Add to that the school experience where girls get better marks, participate more, take on leadership roles, and learn self-confidence, young people can't help learning to look down on males.

AnonymousAug 27 2004 9:50am

Have you noticed most news anchors are women these days? The fact we get our information from women has a psycological effect also. It reinforces their image of superior intelligence.

PaulSep 06 2004 8:46am

also here in the uk,most of the new sports reporters are female.My dad hates it,but i love it,also agree about the huge number of female anchers,imagine what it will be like in another decade or two.Seems also to be a large number of female producers and directors,check out the credits(sad i know,but i have noticed it a lot recently)

frankSep 06 2004 5:15pm

go screw yourself you are total idiots, and i think you know it. of course you do!

j. hamburgSep 07 2004 8:00pm

Hostility is a strange reaction to the truth.

AnonymousSep 08 2004 8:26am

wow chill out j.Hamburg.Why get angry when here in the uk,it is true that women seem to becoming the face of tv.Maybe it is only because the powers that be,think its better to get your news from a pretty face.But i believe they are just making massive inroads into all forms of jobs,and the results are slowly beginning to show.I mean go back 10-15 years and see the difference on the tv then.There was few if any female sports reporters.

willSep 08 2004 11:20am

las mujeres siguen siendo tan tontas y estupidas como siempre , solo que la indusria del entretenimiento las ha puesto en un alto pedestal , aqi asistimos al entronamiento de la mujer prostituta , triunfo en la sociedad actual la prostitucion observe madona , brittney speers , thalia, etc. y todo el enjambre de prostitutas en el mundo holiwoodense es dominado por la decadencia moral y espiritual de un a sociedad que exporta pautas de comportamiento errado pero que vende al resto del mundo como bueno y deseable pobres , lo malo es que muchos se lo creen ,hoy para vender en los espectaculos hay que desnudarce y ceder a la lascivia y a la bajesa sexual ,solo se que alguien esta detras de todo esto es una mente maestra que tiene mucha experiencia con el pecado y experto en perder y extraviar a la gente y por consecuencia a la sociedad .en el principio el uso a la mujer y ella cayo yarrastro al varon mas noble y fuerte que ella al final del tiempo la historia se repite el varron cedera nuevamente o esta ves solo ella se perdera.

el profetaSep 23 2004 4:52pm

IF U CN RD THS U ND TO GET A LYF

AnonymousOct 02 2004 5:24pm

No way. Females are not superior , this kind of bigoted thinking belongs in Nazi germany (only they believed they were superior to jews, think about it, theres little difference). Males are not superior either, I find it deeply saddening that I see so many males being destroyed mentally by all this female superiority propoganda, of course you are going to underperform if you believe that you are inferior. I for one am a male, and I can tell you, I am doing extremely well at college, if a woman comes up to me saying I am mentally inferior, I will show her my results and see her pathetic face distort as she sees the truth. I cant believe people are actually believing this nonsense! More fool you! Females have their qualities, males have their qualities, its just that in this day and age, being male is deemed as wrong. Males are being attacked in the media, unfair stereotypes are being shown, all a mans life he is told that he is inferior, that he is somehow some pathetic lowlife violent thung, a 'potential rapist' , dirt of a bottom of a womans shoe. Note to men : Do not believe this superiority lark, it took Winston Churchill to stop Hitlers rants of superiority, I am wondering what will rectify this new wave of bigotry that we see.

Fenrir_0025@hotmail.comOct 06 2004 2:49pm

It's great! Females are passing males up in schools, with better grades and higher test scores. Females are proving to be better managers in the business world, where the majority of new businesses are female-owned. We are far superior, and we have plenty so show for it.

SandyNov 10 2004 11:24pm

I think it's great too. Society has finally reached the point where we can fully utilize the entire population to it's fullest potential. There was a time when there was a need, real or perceived, to have large families and since you don't get much milk from a mans nipples, women stayed home. But 100 years ago being a housewife was a full time job. With modern conveniences it no longer is and now women can have careers if they choose to and that is to everyones advantage. IT's not a superiority lark that females far surpass males in school and now business. They're more intelligent. Evidently, much more intelligent and they know it. Not universally but on average, it is indisputable. The more women in power positions the better of we will all be.

AnonymousNov 13 2004 2:55am

So true. Another factor is the advancement of technology, which is rapidly eliminating the demand for masculine characteristics in the workplace and the business world. Women are better qualified for the jobs of today than men, and the gap is increasing as women become better educated.

TinaNov 13 2004 9:07pm

Anonyomous and Tina have touched on social facts that shape young people's experience today. Boys and girls grow up today without the prejudices of the past about "women's work" or "a woman's place," in fact what they see around them is examples of women living up to their potential, and in many cases working easily alongside men or doing better than them. I don't know if they would conclude that women are superior but they certainly aren't learning that women are inferior.

AnonymousNov 19 2004 4:56pm

Since girls are so much better in school and they are influenced by the young women outperforming men in business, it is hard to believe they wouldn't conclude that they are superior.

AnonymousNov 20 2004 6:54am

Regarding Fenrir_0025@hotmail.com's comment on female superiority: > > > > > > > > I am male and grew up believing the same thing. I would hear comments that women matured earlier or were somehow better but dismissed them. And I understand the comment about his grades being better. I too have come across women (and men) who need help learning and understanding things. The world is full of people of varying levels of knowledge and aptitude. If we are to make a case for gender superiority, we have to understand we are speaking in general terms. There will always been exceptions just as there are geniuses and idiots of both genders. So we are examining the majority of women versus the majority of men. Secondly, we have to dismiss the notion that since we are of the same species, we MUST be equal but different. This is an ideal and frankly one I wish was true. However, the evidence clearly shows, women are not only different, but truly better in many ways. Just because this isn't what I would like, I can't deny the truth: Women ARE doing better in most levels of education all over the world. Studies show women have better senses, especially taste and smell. And they do better in facial recognition tests. Studies show women have more stamina and better endurance. In many cases, they handle colds better than men. Ever notice men with a cold get knocked down harder while women keep going? Many teachers find women are better learners. This due in part to not being afraid to ask questions and appear dumb. Women's brains are wired differently and have better connections to both hemispheres. Women are biologically superior (including the double X advantage). Women have better language and communication skills and are better at multitasking. Studies also find that women have better memories. They make better investors. And I could go on but I'm not writing a book. On the other side of the coin, men are more susceptible to certain diseases. They have more emotional and developmental problems. Men are filling the prisons while women are filling the universities. Some call this a jack-off site since the idea of women being superior gets some men hard. They know women are taking over and the roles are being adjusted (or corrected, depending on your point of view). This is relevant, but beside the point. No one really knows how society will change over time but I think its a safe bet to put your money on women making major contributions and leading us into a better world. As our superiors they will guide and train us men to become better people. You see, women also eat healthier, take better care of themselves and others. They even donate more to charities. All in all I really admire and respect women. And yes, I reluctantly have to admit my inferiority since this is the reality of female superiority. But this doesn't mean men should give up and not get educated. Men need to strive to overcome our weaknesses and become better persons. Be the best we can be. This is what most women want too. Societal changes are happening VERY rapidly. I see more and more where its the woman who rules in the relationship. And with good reason, since female superiority isn't a dream or a belief. It's a fact and its true.

STTGJan 05 2005 10:38pm

What a load of sad, self-deluding losers! There is really nothing more to say to your imbecilic nonsense.

BillyFeb 11 2005 6:17pm

damn right billy boy,f*ck help us if a war ever started,with all the poofs on this site we would lose easily.

jjFeb 21 2005 1:42pm

People are beginning to realize that wars will be less andless likely the more women are in power. And don't go on about Margaret Thatcher. One or two women in a male dominated power structure tend to play the boy's game. When women reach real parity with men in the positions of power in the world things will really change for the better.

AnonymousApr 24 2005 1:23pm

I want to make a comment to the woman named Diane from above. The one who has been in college administration for thirty years. If a man had given a woman that kind of treatement, you would have poo your panties about how abusive he is. It's amazing how you women rationalize and accept in yourselves what you condemn in us. And you say that in a nutshell that is the future. Hypocrisy, thy name is woman. Women will be far more incompetent in running the world because they cannever accept accountability. The world is doomed to matriarchal tyranny, far worse than patriarchy ever could be.

TedApr 25 2005 6:38pm

Females are passing up males in school because of this affirmative action crap. If you are so damned superior why do you continue to need it?

TedApr 25 2005 6:47pm

All Diane did was verbally reprimand (gave a tounge lashing to) an incompetent subordinate who happened to be male. If anything, it only demonstrates that she is assertive and in control, and deserves to be in an authorative position. If he failed to complete his assigned task, he got what he deserved, and she should be commended for doimg what needs to be done. It is not an example of matriarchal tyranny, it is an example of confidence and leadership ability in a strong woman. If a man can't handle answering to a woman in a position of authority, he is the one with the problem.

BethMay 10 2005 4:51pm

He has a big problem because it's impossible to go through life without answering to a woman unless perhaps you're in construction. But even in that career it is unlikely because when renovating a house the wife invariably becomes the primary client. Not because she has authority over her husband but because women care much more about their homes than their husbands do. If Ted is a white collar worker, he's done for because more and more men have to defer to women in the office world.

a guyMay 21 2005 5:47am

Female superiority is probably not being advanced in kids today however I have heard boys rationalize why they are so far behind girls academically by saying "Girls are smart.". Reciprocally it's not uncommon to hear girls say that boys are stupid. I don't remember feeling that way when I was a child. Perhaps it's just a lack of maturity or a lack of sophistication that makes kids say such things. Women do seem to be more intelligent in most areas but that doesn't necessarily mean that a blanket statement like "men are stupid" is accurate.

AnonymousMay 29 2005 7:44am

Anon, superiority is a comparative term. Younger people these days see a lot of evidence of female superiority in the academic world and in small business where women are starting twice as many businesses as men and completely dominating fields that were once almost exclusively male, such as real estate and middle management. Also there is a continual stream of scientific data affirming the natural superiority of the female sex on a genetic and physiological level. The taboos about women being strong have been lifted and females are asserting themselves like never before. Men are, in many ways, not as smart as women even though there are a lot of highly intelligent men. On average women have greater IQs than men. If you take a random sample and exclude 1 percent of the most intelligent people of both sexes, women are significantly smarter than men. There may be a few more males in the top 1%, but they are, in a sense, freaks and not the norm at all.

womnpwrJun 01 2005 11:22am

The facts that women posess superior multi-tasking and intellectual abilities are strong evidence to support the idea that women are mentally superior. Superior intellect is all women need to call the shots.

BethJun 19 2005 12:14am

Finally, society is returning to Matriuarchy, I readily take my place beneath the Authority and Rule of Womyn. I submit to her strength over me and I obey her wisdom as she leads me into wisdom. Women are the natural leaders of men and, now men are finally seeing the truth of womans'primacy. Women are the born leaders and a man is to follow under, be quiet and demure, submissively bowing to her superior power, strength and wisdom.

dennisJul 06 2005 12:44pm

You only have to look at young women today and how they act,they have a certain aragance about them now,i reckon they realise they can do what they want,and do it better then men.Guys like randy will never change,but the younger ones will have grown up,besides these girls and will be used to seeing women beating men at most things,so it will not be seen as someting strange or weird,like some guys seem to today.What i love is how men still deny it,yet everywhere you look women,are working away hard,and overtaking men.In the uk they dominate medical,law,vets, schools as well as education,also middle management is pretty much female dominated,and they start up more new companys then men.Also this week it has been reported women in the uk,are richer then men from the ages of 18-44yrs old,and by 2025 will have the bulk of the money.Better just get used to it guys,you can fight it,but most men it seems are not,or just aint up to it.

chrisJul 27 2005 4:32pm

It is estimated at the rate that male college enrollment is declining that in about a dozen years the student population will be exclusively female. If women are the only ones with access to higher education, it is only logical that they will be in control of things economically. She who holds the pursestrings has the power to call the shots across the board, money and power go hand in hand.

DarcyAug 23 2005 10:36pm

Its funny is it not though,that men who try to deny that women are taking over,say things nowdays like education is not so important,and the exams are to easy,aslo as to why there are no male teachers,its because its to lowly paid. Yet when males dominated education,it was a good job,and to get a education was highly thought of.Makes me laugh at how they twist it to suit themselves. Still bet they will not be laughing so hard,when they find there bosses are nearly all female,and they cannot rise higher in there jobs,because they dont have the right exam results,and degree. I am at the moment sitting a adult education class,as well as having a fairly good job.What is amazing is the course i am on,has a female teacher,and 20 out of 25 female students.The lady in charge of getting people in to the course,told me they have tried everything they can think of,to get more male students,but they just will not appear.She reckons they are now running scared,she straight up tode me this,and what the hell could i say back,the statistics worldwide bar a few countrys,totaly back this up. Gonna be a scary strange world,for the largly uneducated,men with nothing to do,and poorly payed jobs.

chrisAug 26 2005 6:14pm

Yes it is, because it's true.

a guyAug 30 2005 10:44am

The concept of female superiority has taken hold on people of all ages. It really is not a debate anymore, those who resist it are an obscure and irrelevant minority.

TomOct 02 2005 12:00pm

Well said Tom.

STTGOct 21 2005 3:28pm

If there are changes too far in the fem supreme direction, it's a superficial fad. But it will be self-correcting. Most guys who buy into it lose the respect of women and aren't even desirable to them. They may not tell you that, but they won't tell you they're using you and banging the guy they like on the side. Women get away with what men let them get away with.

SCNov 21 2005 8:29am

Yes and rightfully so.

HERboyJan 28 2006 5:42pm

Women stronger than men seems exciting now because it is still new. When the newness fades, men are going to become very weary of stronger women, and women will feel unsatisfied by weak wimpy men.

Anonymous 101Apr 03 2006 10:41pm

It's not really new. As stated elsewhere, men have been excited by the idea of women being stronger since the amazon legends.

AnonymousApr 06 2006 7:26am

Since women are so superior, let THEM fight the wars while us weak and stupid men stay home and enjoy life without women. Contrary to popular belief, us men can be very happy without sex. Being away from women helps us males to focus our minds and find true meaning. And save lots of money.

Kung Fu MasterApr 15 2006 10:04pm

Yes, the notion female superiority being imprinted on the younger generation. And it looks like the girls are enjoying it.

AnonymousApr 19 2006 11:39pm

Since males seem to want to spend their educational life after puberty having fun and not applying themselves to study why not ban all males from higher education.Males need to be educated just enough for the menial and hard physically tasks.The resources should be directed to female education as being superior intelectually and having a greater ability to concentrate and study they will fill the command roles in employment.No male should be in charge of a female in the work place or the home unless she be a child.Males should be excluded by law from the teaching proffession if they don't exclude themselves by dint of their own lack of effort or qualifications.In any firm no male should earn more than the lowest paid female.

Big BrendaApr 28 2006 6:51pm

Women should be wearing miniskirts as often as possible: At work, school, shopping, public events, etc. And get rid of those irritating SLEEVES! Women should be showing arms, shoulders and back. This business of women wearing sleeves and long pants that cover knees is GARBAGE !!

He ManMay 01 2006 10:19pm

Female superiority is not merely a notion being imprinted in the minds of the young, it is an undeniable fact. As a girl I don't merely think myself to be superior to boys I rejoice in the knowledge that I am superior. Nearly all the pupils in the top groups at my school are girls, the reverse being true for the remedial classes which are bulging at the seems with underachieving pointless examples of male failure who's only purpose in life seems to be to try and gratify their primal sexual urges. We don't need to sell a notion of female superiority to either sex, both girls and boys instictively know it to be true. GIRLS RULE!!!!

A GIRLMay 21 2006 11:52pm

As a male I also rejoice in the knowledge that the female is superior. Unfortunantly it has taken far too long for this truth to emerge from years of suppresion, but finally and joyfully it is acknowleged fact. It's amazing how the fight for equality has turned into the fact of female superiority.

AnonymousMay 22 2006 11:16pm

A whole generation of boys and Girls are growing up witnessing first hand the superior achievements of Females. The best and brightest minds of the future will be Female. It is reality that is leving its imprint.

womnpwrMay 23 2006 10:11am

A woman's place is in the home.

Old FashionedMay 24 2006 11:03pm

A man's place is in the home.

New FashionedMay 27 2006 6:17pm

A Girl is entirely right Women are superior and there is not a "notion" but a demonstable fact that they are superior.Praise to the Goddess that Women are finally going to rule society and guide us to the peacefull prosperous future that rule will entail.

AnonymousMay 28 2006 6:31am

The superioity of women is so taken for granted now, that all the discussion is of how to possibly reverse the decline of males. It's not that males have declined, it's just that the natural superiority of females which had been suppressed for so long is now being allowed to flourish. The greatest advancement in human history is the recognition of the superiority of the female.

AGMay 28 2006 7:54am

Sorry New Fashioned but you are wrong. A mans place is licking the feet of his superior.... WOMAN!!!

A GIRLMay 30 2006 1:32am

A man's place is in the home. Taking care of the children and the home while the head of the household, the superior female goes out to work.

AnonymousMay 30 2006 12:32pm

I disagree. A man's place is where ever he wants it to be as long as he earns it. It's not a universal truth that women are smarter than men any more than it is a universal truth that men are larger than women. It's just that most women are more intelligent than most men. This leaves room for guys to succeed or at least work.

maleMay 31 2006 11:09am

"most women are more intelligent than most men." It's really astonishing how widely accepted this truth has become. What was once unthinkable has become accepted truth. Amazing!

AnonymousMay 31 2006 3:18pm

a girl a mans place is in the home licking a Womans feet, bottom,anus, vagina,clitoris or anything else of hers he is ordered to lick.

Lou RollsJun 01 2006 5:45am

www.likelike.com/poll.php?poll_id=2550

AnonymousJun 07 2006 12:52pm

female-led-relationships.com/forum/index.php

AnonymousJul 16 2006 6:48pm

And why not! The way of the future is Female supremacy and a total reversal of roles and power between the sexes..... get used to that lacy apron males as you dutifully submit and obey your Female Masters without a word of backtalk.

OmphaleAug 16 2006 10:39am

It seems that the media propaganda against men never stops. Today I saw a TV program which empatically said that ALL of the world's problems are caused by men, and women would be much happier in a world with NO MEN. If somebody made a TV program claiming that the world would be better if there were no negros or no Muslims or no Chinese or no women, there would be outrage directed against that TV station. Yet men are targeted by the media every day, and nobody protests.

2006/08/19Aug 19 2006 10:22pm

My wife excepts this as fact and always says that women are superior in every way and is very competitive. I had made mention that women are weaker, now that we have a home gym I shoked at her physical strength. Her endurance is killing me and the result is that she will out work me in our gym. She has gained strength so fast as to become stronger in the legs and match my upper body strength in a fairly short time. She has been comparing her strength to mine all along and is now showing me how she has gained strength much faster as well as adding muscle to her frame. I could tell for sure but she showed me comparing our recorded log books (that was her idea) and is now stating that this is what is happening "women are becoming the stronger sex all around and superior physical strength is in our future too" "I am becoming stronger than you and there is nothing that will change that outcome" now when I workout with my wife, she sets the pace and is already stronger in her legs but is now proving to pull ahead of me in upper body strength. At first it was as all along her ability to do more reps and sets and now to keep up with the same weight, I can't match her sets unless I remove weight. This has started about four months ago. She now says that this is just the beganing and that she is only going to get stronger.

AnonymousAug 20 2006 1:42pm

Yes woman are outperforming man academically, socially, biologically and even PHYSICALLY. More and more proof is coming to light that they are stronger too. They are closing the strength gap quite fast. Many of you men are finding that out as you are out muscled by your wife, sister, or female friend. As the rest of the male rule falls to women so we see physical strength increasing in women until men are finding the shocking truth of ... she's now even stronger he.

CarlyAug 20 2006 1:56pm

As women gain more and more control over society, they will discover the many uses of "feminization." The highly feminized role, terms of dress, posture, behavior and voicing was designed by men over the centuries to enforce submissiveness among women. The point is that there is NOTHING that this role that is necesarily "female". Look at the successful female leaders and athletes and you will see no trace of the "sissy" type image. It is simply a tool that has been used to enforce social control and it can just as easily be applied to men as women. In the greatest gender reversal since the ancient overthrow of the "Mother Goddess," women will begin to take hold of feminization as a means of maintaining control over males. This was foreshadowed in the Victorian era when women (mothers and governesses) would discipline adolescent boys by making them dress in feminine attire and adopt feminine behaviors as a form of punishment. This was known as "petticoat discipline." Today, men are being feminized in a thousand different ways. In the future, feminization will be used as a form of social control and what we now think of as especially female attributes will be enforced for males. Mens' shoes will become more ornate, less comfortable and ultimately be so unstable and hard to remove that any woman will be able to outrun any man on any street anytime. Men's fashions will feature fabrics and designs that are more delicate, more constricting, harder to put on and take off and more focussed on fashion than function. Even male voices will change. I can see the day when it is considered the height of rudeness for a male to use the chest register when speaking. Men will be expected to speak in a whisper-- or not at all. As this happens, males will as a whole will lose mental and physical strength. Indeed that was the whole point of the highly feminine image in the first place. For centuries it helped keep "women in their place." The greatest irony is that males will ultimately have these techniques used against them--- every day, for centuries to come.

AnonymousAug 30 2006 7:08am

Look men are strong and being strong is all that really matters. No woman can really beat up any man in the real world. If some men want to play around and pretend like women are all powerful and everything that's fine by me but its all fake and doesn't change the facts of life. Men run the show always have always will.

A Real ManAug 31 2006 8:22am

Actually, being intelligent counts for quite a bit as well. Napolean, Al Capone, these guys weren't exactly physically intimidating, they gained power through brain not brawn. Beyond that I agree. Some of these fantasies are just that.

AnonymousAug 31 2006 1:09pm

Intelligence is a combination of nature and nurture. Clearly, men and women each have their own distinctive talents and traits. The question is which talents and traits society chooses to value and reward most abundantly. In the past, male traits were exalted and female traits were defined in the narrowest possible scope. (Home, family, marriage etc.) In the future, female traits will rise in importance and common male behaviors will be defined as deviant or even criminal.

AnonymousSep 01 2006 6:31am

Male behavior is already being defined as criminal. Merely LOOKING at a woman the wrong way is now enough to get a man labeled as a rapist or fired from his job -- even though he never touched a woman and never even attempted to touch them.

Anonymous Male VictimSep 01 2006 1:31pm

I used to resent some of the sexual harrassment attitudes but I have come into line with what women demand. They still want us to hit on them, it's just that we have to do so more respectfully. And they're right to feel that way. They're always right about everything.

AnonymousSep 02 2006 4:29pm

The results of "scientific" studies are determined politically more often than people realize. If a "scientific" study concluded that women were somehow inferior to men, would those results be publicized in the pro-Feminist, male-bashing news media? No way!! That would be politically incorrect. Only "scientific" studies that conclude female superiority are good enough to be publicized in the pro-Feminist, male-bashing news media. Furthermore, any researcher who discovered any kind of female inferiority would probably be defunded and slandered. Only researchers who conclude female superiority get additional funding, so they can publish more male-bashing "research."

Angry ManSep 06 2006 5:54pm

Anonymous, just because you are whipped, don't class us all in with you. Women are not always right, in fact they are wrong a lot of the time. They just hide their wrongs up with "make up" much like they do their faces because they can't accept the fact that they aren't as attractive without it. Men rule this world, and the only place women will rule is on this place. Like Like

Future King of AmericaSep 09 2006 6:11pm

Many places in the USA have low or very low educational standards. Therefore, outperforming the average is easy, so females who outperform males have little to boast about. I fear that the low academic performance of boys is merely a symptom of a deeper psychological problem: It seems that American males are more depressed, discouraged, aimless and unmotivated than ever before. What is causing this mental fog, and how to escape it?

Samurai PsychiatristSep 10 2006 7:32pm

Anonymous on the feminisation of males.Brilliant i think you have really hit on something.Of course males will not be allowed to shout at Womyn except maybe to warn them about a fastly advancing male drawn rickshaw etc.males will nee a vast array of laws and conventions tailored for them in order for Womyn to feel safe and comfortable around the violent sex. However the point about Governesses employing petticoat discipline highlights the extremely patriarchal society of Victorian times.Why should it be humiliating to don the superior sexes clothing? Please please write again.

Lou RollsSep 12 2006 4:04pm

By "feminization" I refer to the patriarchal attitude that women are the "weaker sex." This idea, is increasingly belied by the facts but the history remains. The HYPER-feminine role was desigend to reinforce submissiveness. That is the role to which I am referring. Active successful women of the feminine kind have already rejected the HYPER feminine role-- recognizing that it is a tool of the dominance.

AnonymousSep 13 2006 7:46pm

New Poll: THE WAR AGAINST BOYS www.likelike.com/poll.php?poll_id=2603

AnonymousSep 19 2006 6:05pm

Has anyone here read THE WAR AGAINST BOYS, by Christina Hoff Sommers? I just finished reading it, and it is excellent.

AnonymousSep 28 2006 11:53am

No I haven't and I never will.

AnonymousOct 14 2006 6:21pm

What is the earliest age at which athletically active girls can have beautiful muscular legs that men like: (1) Age 18 (2) Age 21 (3) Age 25 (4) Age 30.

MiniPollOct 29 2006 6:11pm

The concept of female superiority is indeed being imprinted on the minds of the young, and it is having a profound effect. It is re-shaping society a little at a time.

BobJan 28 2007 1:02pm

I think the percentage of males who accept female superiority has risen sharply over the last decade. Probably most men now really believe that wome are superior. Only a small percentage of girls would not laugh out loud at the suggestion that males are superior.

wmnpwrJan 29 2007 2:32pm

Sat. 2/3/07

Date UpdateFeb 03 2007 9:57pm

#110

#Feb 06 2007 10:34pm

The assertion of female superiority has been so successful in schools that few boys would now question that girls are more imtelligent and able than they are. The strange thing about this phenominum is that both girls AND boys are so comfortable with this shift in gender power that female SUPREMACY can be but a few step further on!

A male who knows his placeMar 01 2007 1:42pm

Males are actually the weaker sex, biologically speaking. Do a google search on xy chromosome, you will see.

dawnMar 04 2007 12:51pm

Dawn is a female chauvenist pig, and I don't believe that superiority, one way or the other can be established by Googling. What a moron!

RandyMar 14 2007 8:57pm

Dawn is correct men are weaker than the women.

benMar 31 2007 4:08pm

In the last thirty years or so, since girls have been encouraged to do well in education and think of their careers they have caught up with and now gone way beyond boys exam results. Boys are currently only achieving grades that girls were making seven years ago, and the gap is growing, despite government initiatives to help boys catch up. The end result, women will have all the highest qualifications, take all the best jobs and ultimately, organise and run the world. So i guess the notion 'females are superior' is being imprinted on our children, because it's true.

NicolaApr 03 2007 11:22am

#0117 (Tue.) 4/10/07

UpdateApr 09 2007 11:04pm

Irrelevant of the content I would expect there to be much more debate.How logistically do you think males will die out ?. With a gradual decline or with a rapid change. I think a few intelligent men of which there are many will have something to say.

FredAug 14 2007 3:34am

If there was a web site with 50 polls about white people being superior to blacks, that web site would be quickly shut down. I want to see all of www.likelike.com permanently shut down and removed from the internet. If that is not possible, then I would like to see all polls on this web site erased and all new polls.

AnonymousOct 21 2007 3:05pm

I had to review a training video this morning at the direction of my Female boss and the video used She and Her as the third person pronouns. In fifty years we have gone from us of the male pronoun to describe a person of unspecified gender, to the 1970's "he or she" and "him or her" to She and Her. I think that does indicate a generational shift and it will accelerate.

obedient husbandNov 28 2007 6:32pm

Nicola is right. For years now, girls and women have been gaining educationally on boys and men. Today, they are pulling away. How can we males not be affected by this. We are seeing daily that we can't keep up academically with them. We now have to look to other ways to find our self esteem and place in the world. In the end, that probably means simply being there to help women as they advance. Certainly, i can see many more househusbands in the future and other jobs that require less education.

thomasJan 21 2008 9:09pm

As interesting and exciting as the femdom/submale thing is, it makes me vomit in my mouth a little to read most of these comments and 'studies'. Women perform better in school because they're good at shutting up and being told what to do, which is how our education system now works. Men who dare to think for themselves, who are independent, who don't fit into a mold, are told they're 'bad' or given amphetamines until they fall in. I'm sure every woman on here will respond with some 'brainwashed' or 'misogynist' argument, but I'm far from your masucline, beer-chugging, All-American Male. My girlfriend is more masculine than I am, my psychiatrist approve me for sex-reassignment if I want to do it, and I was brought up by a single mother. I have ever personal reason to wish female-domination was the norm, because then I wouldn't feel so out of place because of my passive-submissive nature. 'Facts' and responses like these though make me realize that women are no better than men.

DanaJan 31 2008 7:45pm

Nicola, girls are taking over not by achievement or padded test scores that favor females, but because of reverse descrimination, or as other nazis like you would like to call it, affirmative action. A process handed to people who just can't cut it

your mammaFeb 01 2008 3:32pm

Its sad that we men have fallen to the point that we have to blame others or hidden agendas for why girls are out performing us. Either we have to step to the plate and do better or admit that they are better than us.

thomasFeb 27 2008 11:30am

The daughters of today are going to castrate the men of tomorrow. GIVE UP YOUR BALLS, BOYS its over.

AnonymousMar 20 2008 8:55am

"The daughters of today are going to castrate the men of tomorrow. GIVE UP YOUR BALLS, BOYS its over.". Luckily I won't need them, because tomorrow I'm going to be a genetically/nanotech enhanced next generation human being. And with the body irrelevant in the battle of the sexes the competition will be a tournament of minds only. Better buff up that personality Anonymous , that's what you'll need where the future travels.

FNOLMar 26 2008 1:45am

It should read "the Hitlers of today are going to castrate the men of tomorrow". Hitler just replaces the word daughters, but they are one and the same.

NGApr 25 2008 5:30pm

Anyone who goes around with the idea that girls and women are more sensitive, thoughtful, nurturning and blah, blah, blah, needs to see the movie Odd Girl Out, and you will see that it just isn't true. Females are just as bad as males and YOU ALL KNOW IT!

sTEVEJun 08 2008 8:35am

Female Superiority does not occur because Women are somehow morally superior to males. Some are and some aren't. Rather it occurs because Women emit what for lack of better words is a Female aspect that mentally and physically subjugates males. The desire to be subsumed by a Woman's inner thighs reduces a male to slave status. For any trekkies out there, all Women are the Dolman of Elas if they get in touch with themselves and learn how to activate their control.

obedient husbandJun 08 2008 2:41pm

I love star trek !. A show that promoted equal rights for all and the ideas of peace , humanity and freedom from subjugation !.

FNOLJun 17 2008 6:58pm

The feminist movement has had a strong subliminal effect on the male population. A lot of men have been influenced by the imprinting of the image of female superiority and have developed fetishes because of it.

AnonymousJul 14 2008 8:05pm

FNOL, what about Mistress Beata on Angel One? She is probably my favorite Star Trek guest character.

obedient husbandJul 26 2008 7:23pm

There is no such thing as female superiority. Get off the drugs now.

RickOct 22 2008 5:34pm

The feminist movement has far reaching effects in school. In one Jr. Hi six 8th grade girls hazed a dozen 7th grd. boys by lining them up making them remove all their clothes and sing I AM WOMAN with the change to YOU ARE WOMAN..you are invinible..etc.." Everyone thought it was hilarious. The girls got two days detention. There was an uproar for a while but as one girl said, now it's a big uproar, but a few years from now, it will be 'a tradition'. A feminists professor commented that oneday all males will be lined up naked and sing YOU ARE WOMAN with their little wee wees showing. The women will all laugh and applaud, the men will all shrink and obey. She's ivy league.

little wee weeNov 27 2008 10:14am

Oh, these Girls are really superior! Yes, that's the way we inferior stupid males must be treated in public! And in private there's nothing better to make us behave properly that a harsh whipping!

Nick NNov 29 2008 6:51am

Little Wee Wee, that never happened. And you are dillusional and I am here to ruin the fun of the inferior liberal feminazis and their panty waste breathren. Men are and always will be in charge. Sorry to disappoint all of your readers of Variations and Penthouse Letters

PaulApr 05 2009 2:30pm

Yes the notion that females are better at everything is being imprinted on the minds of the young by female teachers who form the majority in that profession.

AnonymousApr 15 2009 1:26pm

yes and it is a good thing girls should know they are superior boys should know they are inferior

SteveJul 21 2009 4:08am

#0140 - (Sat.) * 10/3/09

UpdateOct 03 2009 1:26pm

This is all very amusing. People like you tend to make me lose faith in the world as 90% of you have, seemingly, no ability to think in logical and complex terms. We all know there are men that may as well be women and women who may as well be men. Also, in all statistics regarding the abilities of men and women the margin is rather small maybe 5-10% which is interesting, but not terribly exciting. Given that there will always be a statistical distribution of abilities among people, male or female, there is going to be some serious overlap when it comes to cognitive and physical abilities. So in answer to the question of which gender is superior: Women might be superior in some areas %5-10 of the time. This is nothing to get too thrilled about. I suspect that most of the women commenting here feel like failures in their personal lives to some degree and need this madness to create the illusion that they are some kind of godlike figure to compensate. I suggest you all go outside, take a deep breath of fresh air and go read a book on logical fallacies. Thank you for reading.

JoeOct 04 2009 11:22am

Little Wee Wee...Even if that did happen, which I sincerely doubt, those girls should have been expelled from school and considered sex offenders just like it would have happened if the boys had done it to them. Shove this I am Woman bullpoo up your ass unAmerican commie pinko.....

Gloria SteinamOct 05 2009 3:27am

Anyone who uses the word "poo" is an idiot.

AnonymousOct 20 2009 9:27pm

The future is female - there is no doubt about it. Women and girls are outperforming men and boys in all areas and by the middle of this century, if not sooner, women will hold all the positions of power and wealth and the vast majority of graduates will be female. Men will have to learn to take second place to the superior women in their lives, but they will adapt and become supportive husbands. It is unlikely that the dominant females will impose a reversal of dress or seek to feminise their menfolk as feminine attire makes a woman glamourous and women will still value the male as a sexual partner. Men will be left in their drab attire, as insignificant drones to their ambitious, dazzling queen. Women will conquer all but men will learn to adapt and survive.

JasmineNov 24 2009 11:48am

However, if the dominant females so wish it is within their power to inflict the ultimate humiliation and to force femininity upon their men and boys and force them to adopt the skirts, high heels and make up that has formally been the province of women and to impose upon them the roles of housewife, secretary, cheerleader and maid and oh for a Star Trek anology imagine a Captain Uhura in the command chair in her command gold shirt and a lowly Lt Kirk in his mini-dress announcing "Hailing Frequencies open Captain"

JasmineNov 24 2009 3:29pm

Mistress Beata of Angel One should have kept Riker as a personal slave and it is too bad Picard didn't lose his trial with Ardra and have to serve Her. One would think that by the twenty-fourth century Star Fleet would have discovered a number of Female dominant cultures but maybe the writers were too closed minded.

obedient husbandDec 01 2009 5:13pm

I've been around for awhile and I've witnessed most of the changes that have taken place in the last 50-60 years. I've watched as females have nearly completely and soon will completely change positions in society with males. It frightened me at first, but today I welcome it as I realize that females are truely superior. One only needs to study the order of creation to realize that God created the basic things first, and that each thing he created was superior to the previous creation. Woman was the last thing created and is indeed the most superior of all of God's creation. Personally, I beleive males, when compared to females are nothing more than emotional and mental infants and should be treated as such. Males in my generation always boasted about "I wear the pants" meaning they were male and had the power. I think it's time for females to quit sharing the pants and take them away and put the males in dresses, skirts, and all the other pretty lacy underthings that will enhance a males sense of inferiority and submission. I would see no harm even if females were to decide that males are so inferior that they be put in diapers for complete and absolute control of every aspect of their life.

obedient and submissive husbandDec 22 2009 1:54pm

Each thing "he" created! Goddess created Woman in Her own image, and created males so that Woman could have slaves.

obedient husbandDec 22 2009 5:57pm

God created Adam and then out of his rib created Eve. As the last of God?s creations, the human female is the perfected version of the human male, and was endowed with superior intelligence, endurance, wisdom and grace. The only advantage conferred upon the human male was his superior upper body strength. Up until recently, males have used their superior physical strength as the basis of their power to build civilization and the modern world, but have abused their power by subjugating women and preventing them from using their superior intellect and wisdom for the betterment of humanity as a whole. In the late twentieth century though, males became the victims of their own successes and propensity for warfare. Increased technological advances over a very short period of time meant that women did not need to spend all their time confined to doing housework and raising children as labour saving appliances came into the home and freed women so that they could enter the workplace. Technological advance favoured women as they are better at interacting with technology than the men who created it. Technology rendered the one advantage that men had over women, their greater physical strength, redundant. As a result of the colossal world wars that were fought in the early twentieth century and which required for the first time for women to be fully mobilized into the war effort, and as a result of political agitation from women?s rights movements, women gained the vote and politicians had to obtain the female vote by passing laws to give women the same rights as men under the law and to provide equal access to education and to the workplace. The economy also changed, becoming more reliant on service industries, which required the skills such as communication, customer service skills and technology at which women excelled, rather than the old manufacturing industries where men had once thrived. Thus, by the end of the twentieth century, men had been forced to give up the political and legal advantages they had once enjoyed over women and were now forced to compete with them in the education system and in the workplace on level terms ? except that, of course, women possessed greater intellect and wisdom than men and now that all constraints upon them had been removed they began to seriously outperform males in education and in the workplace. Within the first couple of decades of the twenty-first century, in the western world women became dominant within the education system, the professions, the business world, communications and entertainment, politics and even the military, as they formed the majority of the officer class. Males, by comparison, were reduced to a disadvantaged minority in all walks of life and were becoming increasingly unemployable and confined to the home as househusbands to their more successful wives. By the middle of the twenty-first century, the gap between men and women had become a chasm and western society faced social problems as a result of high levels of male underachievement, unemployment, crime and resentment of the success of women. In response to these problems, women across the western world formed a political movement, The Matriarchy, which advocated the superiority and domination of women and inferiority and subjugation of males for the good of society. The Matriarchy gained widespread support from the majority of women and the movement gained power at the polls in most western countries. The new all-female governments and legislatures soon passed laws stripping men of the right to vote and to hold public office, to own property and businesses, to be employed in the professions and to be company directors. Men were effectively excluded from public life. Having gained complete control of the state and the economy, the new governments concentrated on the solution to the social problems posed by the mass of redundant males, which was a programme of enforced feminization of all males under the age of 16. All such males were required to report to special facilities where they were forced to dress in female clothing and accessories and make up and trained to become maids and then, once trained, sent back to their homes to serve as maids. The Matriarchy then imposed sumptuary laws upon the members of both sexes. Women were to dress in the suits traditionally worn by men, eschewed the use of cosmetics and jewellery, and the frills and lace on underclothes was removed. Males were forbidden to wear trousers and had to adopt the traditional dress of women, including skirts, dresses, frilly underwear, make up, jewellery and high heels. Women considered this a small price to pay for the advantages they now enjoyed over males. The humiliation of males was now complete as they now had to consider what pretty underwear and frock to wear each day. That most constricting and feminine of garments, the corset and petticoat was re-introduced, to be worn by males as a means of control and humiliation and all males were required to wear them from an early age. Thus adult males became as corseted and petticoated as any lady in the early twentieth century. Thereafter, the upbringing of boys was to mirror that traditionally given to girls i.e as babies they were dressed in pink, then put into little girls? dresses and made to play with dolls, do ballet and tap, and have their ears pierced. Then, dressed in schoolgirls uniforms, they attended classes to give them basic reading, writing and math skills only until the age of ten. They were then to attend the Maids Academy for full training as maids, including all the skills needed to keep a home clean and tidy, sewing, embroidery and etiquette. Particular emphasis was placed on personal hygiene, including the removal of all body hair, make up, beauty and fashion tips. Maids passing all the exams then graduated and were assigned to the home of woman to serve her completely. Throughout this process, boyish traits were highly discouraged and boys were made to be demure, submissive and eager to please and eager to follow the lead of a strong woman. Electrolysis was used on all pre-adolescent boys to prevent them ever having facial or body hair and boys were taught to speak in soft, dulcet tones. Boys were taught that women were superior in every way to them and must be obeyed. The will of even the strongest boys was broken so thoroughly that the end product would not dare to even open his mouth to contradict a female, let alone commit any act of rebellion. Girls attended a female only school, where boys could not disrupt classes or otherwise distract the girls, dressed in trousers and received a full education in all subjects and a full sports and extra curricular programme. All women were educated to degree level and then entered the workplace to embark on their careers. Throughout childhood and adolescence, women were encouraged to be leaders, to be assertive, competitive and opinionated and driven to succeed and were taught that all males were inferior to them in every way. Naturally, over time, this meant that the male became progressively weaker physically, intellectually feeble, timid mentally and emotionally stunted, while the development of females in all these areas became enhanced. Males became the weaker sex in every way and to the weaker sex is assigned the traditional feminine role, as distinct from the sexes. History was taught to both sexes to show that when men were given power and responsibility, centuries of warfare and suffering were the inevitable result and that only women had the wisdom to wield power for the benefit of everybody and that allowing men any measure of power was the recipe for disaster for mankind. Women were allowed, if they wished, to formally marry any maid in their service. The male selected for marriage had no choice in the matter and as per his upbringing would assume the role traditionally intended for the female and would attend the wedding fully dressed as a bride. In the ceremony, he would take an oath to obey his wife in all things and would take her name. Thereafter, he would assume his husbandly duties as homemaker and child rearer. When required by his wife to be presentable for her friends and business associates, he will have his hair, nails and make up done in a beauty salon, buy himself a new evening gown and dainty lingerie and become a pretty accessory to his wife on business and social meetings. Finally, laws were passed to deprive men of any rights under the law and made them the property of their wives, mothers, or the mistress they served as a maid. A woman had the right to punish any male or to transfer ownership of him to another mistress. Males, helpless and dependent upon a woman for the most basic essentials of life have no choice but to submit and obey. This is the future??.all trends and statistics point to it. After centuries of being held back and marginalized by men, it is now payback time. P.S As an inferior, but feminine male who bitterly laments not being born as a female, I would be proud to stand at the altar in my silk bridal gown, corset, petticoats and veil and submit to a strong woman and to thereafter serve her like a submissive handmaiden as I recognize that women are destined to rule.

JasmineJan 01 2010 3:56pm

Sounds like Regiment of Women by Thomas Berger.

obedient husbandJan 02 2010 4:39pm

My vision is extreme, but the main points hold good and are backed up by the statistics. Females are outperforming males and it is becoming increasingly apparent that not only is the male not superior to the female, he is not even her equal. It is human nature that when you encounter somebody who is less able than you you will at best feel pity and be slightly patronising to that person or at worst become so irritated by their failings that you will put them down or ridicule them - this is now what is beginning to happen between the superior woman and the inferior man. The next logical conclusion that woman will draw is that as men are inferior to them, they should not hold positions of power and responsibility, especially not over a woman, and should not even be entitled to vote. What the future holds is hard to say but the main issue is what is going to happen to millions of inferior men, who can't get the traditional jobs their father's had, won't retrain to do "women's work". The only avenue open to men is to be pleasing to their wives and a good homemaker and father. For those who want to be in the workplace, they will need to become more "feminine" not to the extent of adopting female dress and behaviour, but they will have to learn to speak in a more pleasing voice,pay ensure that they are well dressed and groomed, learn better communication and customer care skills and learn to multi-task. As these are not part of the male psyche, a painful period of learning and adjustment will be required. I can foresee that enforced cross-dressing will be increasingly used against naughty boys or house husbands who fail to keep house properly or be attentive to his wife, as women become more confident in their mastery. Interesting times lie ahead, especially for us males.

JasmineJan 03 2010 6:45am

Further to my last post,the ascendancy of female over male is already upon us - women now outnumber men in the US workforce, the world's largest and most powerful economy and the this trend will extend to the rest of world, which tends to follow the lead of the USA. Males are being rapidly squeezed out of the workplace and education system (85% of the jobs lost in the current recession in the US were those of male employees) and are being subtley feminised by society - witness the tighter clothing for younger men, ear piercing and even male "make up" and more and more men are now resorting to surgery to make themselves look better and younger, and are using far more products to enhance their appearance than even 10 years ago. The long journey to the feminisation of the male is well underway and the end product will be radically different to the male of today. Some women are already using their power to impose enforced femininity upon their menfolk as a means of asserting their dominance and maintaining control - I read about it every day.

JasmineJan 07 2010 1:43pm

No, the notion of female superiority is not being imprinted on the younger generation of males. All it does is give us gas and that warns us all about what your intentions are. That's when we explode and make life miserable for all of you female supremacists.

Zac EfronJan 12 2010 11:38am

No, tammi. The wife in those commercials posses average intelligence, whereas the husbund is clearly a retard.

an intelligent life formJan 12 2010 12:59pm

If my relationship is anything to go by, girls are totally in control. My girlfriend is not only taller than me but physically stronger too as she works out everyday. She is more confident and assertive than me and has a better paid job with real prospects whilst my career prospects are limited. My girl calls the shots in everything from home finances to what I get to wear. She has sensed that I am more "feminine" in personality than her and as I am smaller and weaker she wears sports underwear and I get to wear the pretty, lacy panties and when the fancy takes her, a complete outfit of her clothes which fit me reasonably well. I do all the cooking and housework and my girl says I will make her an sweet wife one day.

JasmineJan 13 2010 2:08am

Equal rights must be demanded of all, by all. Authority must be earned, never given freely.

an intelligent life formJan 20 2010 6:19pm

Are any of you celebrities?

Julia RobertsJan 24 2010 7:16pm

Well, Julia, if we were surely you would have heard of us?

JasmineJan 26 2010 12:05am

The question was 'Is the notion female superiority being imprinted on the younger generation?' I say yes and a good thing too! Males need to be understand that females are generaly brighter, better communicators, networkers, nourishers. We think faster, we can endure more pain, we live longer, we are less subject to disease and all our sesnses are more acute than the males. We are better multi-taskers and more balanced decision makers. This is not prejudice or misandry. Try reading a book guys! The weight of evidence for female superiority is awesome and mounting every day. The male brain fixated on aggression and sexual obsession makes it unsuitable to hold any decision role in society. The poor dears are just not up to it. The last two thoudand years is proof enough if you doubt me. In my view tertiary education should almost exclusively reserved for females. Its kinda going that way anyway! Boys should be taught how to read and write and basic arithmetic. That will be sufficient for most. After that they can undertake vocational courses that our useful to women in society. The dirty. menial, brain free tasks that that the Superior gender do not wish to do. Its really time accepted these these self evident truths and learned to live with it.

SylviaFeb 09 2010 11:48am

Sylvia,f*ck women in society. This is a man's world. You get back into the kitchen and keep your big mouth shut.

Gloria Steinam and Robin MorganMar 22 2010 2:02am

Does anybody have any kleenex?

Snot NoseMar 22 2010 2:14am

If women are such great nourishers, this is all the more reason for them to stay home and take care of their kids.

Feminist ManMar 22 2010 2:15am

Check out the website "Femulate" - it's a scarily accurate picture of the role reversal steadily taking place between the sexes and very amusing too! Before too long women will be wearing the trousers, literally, and men will be in dresses. It's the future.

JasmineApr 19 2010 11:55am

About 8% of males have color-vision deficiency compared with only 0.4% of females, a 20 to 1 advantage for the female. Dichromasy, the most severeform of color-vision deficiency occurs in about 2% of males and only 0.02% of females, a 100 to 1 advantage for women. I took a color-vision test with my wife. I could not determine the numbers among all the colored dots. She tried to show me the numbers by drawing over them with a pen in an attempt to help me see the numbers. It only made mattters worse for me. I felt so inferior to her at that point. She got 6 of 6 test plates correct while I got only 1 of 6 correct. She said, "Now will you admit you are color blind?" What could I say?

Color-blind Male (green deficient)Apr 19 2010 2:26pm

There is no question that females have made enormous gains in educational achievement, while males have lagged farther and farther behind. In 1985 the college population was divided about equally between males and females. As of 2010 the college student population is about 60% female to 40% male, a substantial change over the 25-year period. There is no evidence that males are doing anything to stop this female advance. What will the situation be 25 years from now. A straight-line projection would suggest 70% female to 30% male. Even if the trend slows a bit, we could easily end up with 65% female and 35% male by 2035. I am not sure if females are actually smarter than males on average, but what is certain is that the female develops much faster than the male and reches the various stages of maturity much earlier. While there is evidence that the female is more mature than the male starting at birth, the maturity gap becomes most pronoumced during the teens and early 20's, coincidng with middle school, high school, and college. I think society would be better if males started first grade one to two years later than females and that the system allow grade promotion based on achievement. The result would be that females, on average, would progress through the grades faster while many males would be held back until they were mentally ready to master the work. My guess is that females would finish high school in the range of 14 to 18 with an average age of 16-1/2. Males would finish betwen 18 and 25 with an average age of 22. O.K., the boys would take 5 to 6 years lnger to get to the same place as the more mature girls, but I think they would be better able to compete with girls for admission to college. Comments please.

JackApr 21 2010 7:31pm

Jack,the way I see it is it is not just a question of girls maturing earlier than boys, which as you rightly say is an established fact and gives them the advantage in the education system, but the main issue as I see it is that the traditional gender sterotypes are STILL prevailing and that males are failing to recognise that perpetuating the old macho sterotypes and the old system of advancing males over females simply because they are males is no longer working for them - they are rejecting education because they associate it with femininity and they are terrified to identify with femininity. The results are obvious - males are falling further and further behind when compared to females and it is very scary to think where this will lead - to millions of unemployable, unmarriagable males who feel that they have no stake in society and will commit crimes to validate their existence - I am not exaggerating here - there is a real danger of anarchy and the collapse of civilsation. What you suggest is part of the solution but what needs to happen before anything is for males be discard the traditional male sterotype and to embrace the ready made alternative - femininity - yes it will be painful and humiliating for the male to remove his pants and put on the frilly, feminine attire usually worn by women but once the transition has taken place the femme male, stripped of redundant stereotypes, will appreciate his new found femininity and be better able to relate to women and girls and become more like them and thus hope to achieve parity with them. The road to true equality will be achieved once all males are in skirts and can accept femininity as THE positive force in mankind's future.

JasmineApr 24 2010 3:34pm

I've been looking at a website called the "Demale Society", which is a secret society dedicated to the feminisation of males by petticoating, discipline, drugs and therapy to reduce or eradicate the testosterone in the male body and to inculcate into the subject feminine behaviours. Their rationale is that males are (largely but not totally) responsible for the problems this planet face and by reducing their testosterene levels and reprogramming them with femininity wars and other disasters will be eradicated. They aim to demale all males one at a time, which could take some time but will exempt some males (called Remales) deemed to be essential for reproduction, heavy manual work or just there to please women. The feminisation of males sounds good, especially for a feminine male like myself who would offer no resistance - I would love to be feminised - but I was disturbed to read their SCUM manifesto. Never have I seen the male gender described in such negative and bleak terms - it essentially said that all males are deformed females and project their negative qualities onto females while appropriating "male virtues" (which are actually female qualities). They advocate the complete eradication of males - they are not even useful for reproduction apparently - by means of women withdrawing from public life and thus bringing civilisation to a grinding halt. Once civilisation has collapsed, women will fill the vaccum and take over and eliminate the economy on the grounds that mankind is advanced enough to become automated so that women only have to work a few hours a week. Males who resist this process are liquidated and the survivors either end up in female attire and serving females or embittered and impotent relics living out a meaningless afterlife. Once the males are gone, the females follow. It is the most bleak tract I have ever read - surely the future for both women and men can be better than this?

JasmineApr 24 2010 4:07pm

By the way, in case you haven't guessed, I am a firm adovocate of male femininity. I believe that the best interests of society will be served when traditional femininity - so derided for so long - is imposed on us males, myself included, by females to encourage or force us into corsetry, frilly knickers, bras, dresses, skirts, blouses, make up and jewellery and to strive to be beautiful and ladylike - whilst the women abandon their feminine trappings and adopt more masculine/unisex clothing which is more practical for their role of breadwinners and leaders. I acknowledge that women are superior to men. In the past it was assumed that men were the stronger sex, women were "feminised" which included the wearing of pretty and restrictive clothing and being forced to be submissive and pleasing. That kind of worked in the past because men were physically stronger and were needed to build the civilisation we enjoy today. However,the future of mankind going forward relies on brain, not brawn, and it is clear that as the intellectually superior gender, women are the future leaders, so what is happening is that women are abandoning femininity as this is no longer relevant to their new status. Males, finding that the old male dominated system no longer works for them, are either discovering femininity for themselves or having it imposed on them by the stronger woman. This will result in an inversion of the sexes where trousered females will rule over skirted males. Males, once the undisputed masters of the earth, preoccupied with mastery and conquest, will become the servants of women,now preoccupied with runs in their tights, touching up their make up, and what sexy lingerie they should wear to please their dominant wife. This is the future - males will have to adjust to learnt to serve women and do so with a pretty curtsey and a smile as they serve.

JasmineApr 24 2010 4:57pm

We males, the afterthought sex (we all start out as female in the womb), must cease and desist with our inbred silly notions that we are the stronger sex. If not it will only make it harder to adapt the more the superior female organism takes prominence! Girls are born with the more sophisticated brains, sensory superiority sheer stamina and a sexual arsenal embodied in their amazing clitorises that no boy can match. So why all the angst? Lets give the girls their due before they decide to castrate us at birth!!!

Mr. MikeMay 07 2010 8:29pm

Hey there, new (inferior) guy again. After a closer examination of the above comments, I was surprised to read STTG's premise that some men jerk-off to this site. And no, I don't doubt it for a minute. Leave it to the male sex to lay about having a wank while girls and women close in on us from every corner! That alone should prove how lazy, lame and stupid my sex really is. Whilst the House Of Patriarchal Superiority Fantasies burns to the ground, we are too busy playing with our peckers to notice. But then, I've never understood the "male as the weaker sex - female domination thing" that many men find so sexually necessary. Probably because I'm GAY ! Even at that I have a hard (?) time getting it up when I realise where my sex his heading so willy-nilly and without a backup plan. WAKE UP, BOYS AND SMELL THE SMOKE !!!

Mr. MikeMay 08 2010 4:54pm

Men, on average, still outperform women on intelligence tests (look it up). But the public schools and the media are completely geared torwards feminism. Women in power are more likely to abuse their power (ever get pulled over by a female cop). Women are not superior, but its time for a feminist society and we'll all suffer because of it.

valerie p.May 16 2010 8:25am

Boys learn differently than girls. Girls learn best by rote and repetition. Boys learn best by action and practice. As a society we have consigned our boys to the bottom of the scholastic heap (as stats now show), precisely because we teach them like they are girls. One size does not fit all. Boys need to be demonstrative in their quest to acquire knowledge. Sitting at a desk all day bores a boy and makes him restless. He has no outlet for the physicality he comes by so naturally. Gender separation is necessary in schools in order to bring up male test scores. The fact remains that males tend to occupy the upper and lower extremes on I.Q. test scores where as girls and women tend to take up the middle. Reports that I have read have concluded that when I.Q. tests are structured to be gender-neutral, GIRLS outscore boys by approximately 3-5 points. And indeed with girls proven sensory superiority (50% better sight, hearing, smell, taste and memory), it's no small wonder girls are poised from birth onward to exceed the accomplishments of boys.

Mr. MikeMay 17 2010 1:53pm

I wish to thank Jasmine for responding to my proposal that boys should go to school with younger girls to help offset faster maturation in girls. To help benchmark this phonomenon, at what age or age range do boys finally "catch up" to the level of an agerage 16-year-old girl? To put it another way, do you think that by 21 or 22 boys are on the level of a female age 16?

JackJun 02 2010 5:34am

Hi Jack. I think that the answer to the question of what age range boys catch up with girls is simply, they don't. The female brain is wired into both hemispheres whilst the male brain is limited to just one hemisphere so a female is capable of doing more with her brain than her male peer. As you have pointed out already, girls mature faster than boys and their concentration span is far longer whilst boys are easily distracted and have short attention spans. The education system favours course work and group activities which girls thrive at and boys struggle with because they get distracted and have more limited communication and teamworking skills than girls. With these disadvantages, it's little wonder that females are now outperforming males by a wide margin at every level of the education system and that margin is getting wider each year as more girls attend higher education and more boys drop out. Unfortunately for males, the situation does not get equal in adulthood. A woman is a lot smarter and emotionally stronger than any man and she will always be superior to him. Ultimately, I can see a segregation of the sexes in the education systems - girls will go to science and tech colleges to ready them for university and good careers. The authorities will reason that it is a waste of time giving boys much education and so they will attend state schools and learn basic math and literacy and skills that will equip them for menial jobs or a future role as househusband for the superior, well-educated career woman.

JasmineJun 02 2010 11:24am

I must partially disagree with the cliche ridden generalizations put forth by Jasmine in her response to Jack above. The male brain is wired to focus on one hemisphere at a time (predominantly). The connective pathway which affords girls easier dual hemisphere brain function is undeniably thicker and enriched with a greater number of neurons than the corpus callosum of boys - yet boys perform as well as or only slightly less so than girls on I.Q. tests. (That must irk the men-should-wear-dresses crowd!) It's one thing to gloat about the obvious gains girls have made academically, but to misrepresent the scope and degree of said gains makes me wonder just how superior some women really are? Are they so desperate to turn the tables on boys and men that they must resort to stretching the truth? Wouldn't today's girls be better served by their female elders if women like Jasmine chose not to adopt the very same tactics that men have used for centuries to subjugate females? Surely eschewing such erroneous (though historically successful) male nonsense would prove women infinitely superior to the biologically weaker sex! Aw, what the hell, let's give Jasmine the benefit of the doubt and hope that she is speaking with tongue firmly implanted in cheek (those above the waist!). Otherwise, I have a difficult time taking her seriously when the main focus of her purportedly superior brain routinely, as if on auto-pilot, digresses into vengeance seeking fantasies concerned with (and I'm a Gay Man, here!) turning men into subservient drag queens! Drag Queens are bar-none, the biggest bitches on der erde! TRUST! You DO NOT want a cross-dressing husband, housebound or otherwise! (Been there, did that, paid the sky-high millinery bills). Better you should fully castrate your "househusband" (as you've already done mentally with just one glance, I'm sure) and sew the relinquished sex organs on as your own. Until then, save it for your next life, sweetie and spare us all the smug eugenics - just come back as a man next time and get the bloody-hell on with it! (By the way Jazz, Gay Men and women have nearly identical corpus callosums!). Stick to the facts, dahling, before they stick to you!

Mr. MikeJun 02 2010 8:17pm

Dear Mr Mike. You clearly haven't read my previous posts in full as I am in fact a genetic male and don't need to castrate any males as I have all the equipment a male should have. I find your references to my assumed "cheeks below the waist" highly offensive the use of which reveals your low opinion of females, or perhaps it is fear, and anyway such remarks make it difficult to take you seriously. However, I am flattered and amused that you believed me to be a genetic female as I wish I had been born as one. I am merely an unhappy, feminine male who recognises that women are superior. Regardless of how well boys do in IQ Tests all of the statistics I have seen show that boys are falling behind academically at EVERY level - in the US and the UK 67% of girls leave university with good degrees compared to about 50% of boys and the majority of undergraduates and post graduates are female. In the UK, the majority of medical and law students are now female and again fewer males are entering these professions each year. It is not just IQ that matters but attitude and the signs are that girls are focused on getting good grades and good careers, whilst boys get distracted and demotivated. In the last recession (aka the he-cession or man-cession due to the loss of million of jobs held by males), very few women lost their jobs as women are now the workers of the future due to their motivation, energy, better communication skills and better equipped intellectually and emotionally to function in an ever changing global economy. In the UK, it was recently reported that the number of househusbands shot up from 60000 in 2000 to 600000 in 2010 - the main reason? The female spouse earnt more and the male could not equal her wage and so simple economics meant he has to stay at home and mind the house and kids. More women, frustrated with the glass ceiling, are quitting the corporate ladder and starting their own businesses and being their own bosses and fewer men are starting businesses. I could on, but I won't. Mr Mike, the truth of female superiority is evident and if you can't handle it that is your problem. And by the way, I wear a dress and I certainly not a bitch and I hope I come back as a woman next time.

JasmineJun 02 2010 10:17pm

Jasmine, allow me to point out, if you will, that you might have overlooked my previous posts with your assumption that I have a problem admitting that the female is the distaff, biologically better put together sex. My previous postings say exactly that. In fact as I suspect, you may very well have read my musings but as a disgruntled, embittered outcast of either sex, are so closed off to the opinions of men that differ from your own or do not validate your fence-straddling choices, that you presume all men to be idiots. In short, disillusioned with your own fractured existence, you have arbitrarily written off every man and boy on the planet as servant and subjugate to the sisterhood you so tragically lament being left out of by accident of birth. Pardon me while I grab my sad rag! How unfortunate to air such profound shortcomings in a venue so cold and impersonal as this. Is there, perchance, therapy and surgery in your future? As to not picking up on your self-imposed surface attempt at gender reassignment - no sooner did I spot all that psycho-babble putting househusbands everywhere in curlers and taffeta bustiers when I found myself rummaging through my former and now deceased, tranny BFF's chest of abandoned apparel, thus completely losing sight of your gender affiliations - wishy-washy and thus difficult to discern except with a flashlight and full-boy search, as they must be. How can a reasonably intelligent man such as myself sit through the hysterical fantasies of a person who discounts honest discourse. Before my opinion is on the table, you have me lumped in to a category that presumes my opinions to be lacking in both validity and experience. I am not a hater of women. Nor of men! It is you, Herr Quisling that hates your own kind! That much my pee-brained male mind somehow managed to glean from your posts. I do not believe any one to be better than his or her opposite if it requires knocking that person down and using their prostrate body in order to hoist ones self up! Save your self-loathing for someone who is as equally imprisoned in his skin as you are. We all face limitations and self-doubt, but taking an entire sex down in your flames of sour-grapes is not the answer, dearest Jazz. I didn't spend five years trying to help my above mentioned friend through his unsuccessful and eventually suicidal quest for gender reassignment and walk away with nothing. Again, you misconstrue the facts regarding societies wholesale abandonment of boys in the classroom. I.Q. does matter as it suggests the foundation of intelligence and the potential realization of that intellectual capacity. You have stated that males are totally lacking in such endeavors. BUNK! If you feel ignorant and, ergo inferior in your undesired male form, please afford those of us at peace with our penises and testosterone the chance to break free of your men-are-little-more-than-stupid-beasts, mentality. Is that what drove you in to wearing a dress? About your "facts": girls (in the U.S.) have not caught up with boys in math. Your data is no doubt skewered with the same anti-male wishful thinking of those who wish it to be so. Like it or not, males enjoy a superiority in spatial and abstract thought that no amount of girl-favoring in the classroom has yet overcome. it is a plus due to our supposedly inferior, poorly connected hemispheres! Who knew! Likewise boys have always trailed girls in reading and other rote skills (Please see my womyn-hatin' entry above - the one you ignored). Oh, forgive me you must be stuck back on the page marked "Mourning What Might Have Been". I see the differences in male-female brains as complementary. Where one leaves off the other picks up. Males have focus while females have breadth. One could only be superior if possessed of both. And here is where I have an edge over the hetero-males you so belittle (your sad self included): research suggests that homosexual men have a more female imprinted brain yet still within basic male parameters! So, please do not discount the entire male race with your female wanna-be generalizations. What you are or "posted" yourself as being, carries little clout in our discussion since you have made this, with a broad sweep of the brush, about an entire gender and not the individuals we all are. Ignorance (fear based, I suspect) hears what it wants to hear. I am the last person who would presume to try and interest you in opening your mind or accepting your biological reality. Just don't hem me in as a man with your psycho-sexual limitations. I would love to be forever 21, as alluring and sexual as I was way back when - but to ignore reality is pure denial. I do not begrudge you your opinion - I just feel at a loss to see what should be serious discussion returned as if in a wigged-out time machine, to the realm of medieval mindsets stuck on Lords turned Ladies, corsets, gowns and serfdom. Is this, then, Jasmine, what you would sentence the entire male sex too? I look forward to your next posting. In the meantime do find a sense of humor!

Mr. MikeJun 03 2010 3:57pm

I realize this female superiority stuff feeds into people's femdom fantasies, and if that's your bag, go to it. I like to play the submissive role myself sometimes with women but it stops as a bedroom game. Even if women are healthier, or smarter (and I say, IF) or better off than men in any capacity it still doesn't follow that men should serve women. You guys and gals are just feeding your own fantasies here. People have different strengths and weaknesses, some of them are male and some of them are female. No gender is, by default of their gender, "superior". However, if people want to play that role then that's there business. The problem I have with all of this is the tendency among the people here to talk about males as if they are degenerate, ignorant imbeciles and believe that it is desirable to teach this to children. By your logic any one who is handicapped must submit to the health "superior" people because they are physically inferior. That's the natural result from the argument here that because women have better chromosomes or recover better from illnesses that they should rule the world, LOL. It just doesn't make any sense. Ladies, go out in the world and be as successful as you can. That is your right and if you end up being the dominant sex, more power to you. However, I think you will find that things are likely to just about even out and that is all. Now that women have more opportunity it is no wonder that women are making great strides, now that there is less oppression. The discrepancy in power was bound to start to balance out. However, it is highly unlikely that you will achieve a matriarchal society with the "dumb" subserviant males as your hired help. There just isn't that much difference between the sexes. Sorry, but it doesn't make sense. Play your femdom games in the bedroom or in your own relationships if you like, but don't you dare go infecting your male children or anyone's children with the idea that they are just a dumb inferior male who needs to be seated at a woman's feet in order to have any value.

PatJun 03 2010 7:27pm

I was merely trying to convey the point that all of the statistics I have seen are pointing to a situation where females are gaining superiority over males in the education system and which will carry over into employment market. Females are becoming the main breadwinners in their families so males are increasingly finding themselves as the stay at home father or are having to come to terms with the fact that they will never earn as much as their female partner. With girls doing better and better at school and university this trend will continue and accelerate. I believe that this will ultimately lead to a reversal of the traditional roles but I don't advocate that males should be feminised - I am a feminine male purely by choice but can certainly appreciate that to forcibly feminise a male against his will is wrong - however, ultimately, the way things are going, power will lie with women. This is not a fantasy, this is fast becomine reality. I don't disrepect males - we have our merits and the world would be a lot less interesting without us - but of late with the rapid advance of women and girls - men do appear to be losing a lot of ground to women and there are frequently articles in the press and online that express concern over a "crisis of masculinity" and and urgent need to help boys in the classroom before they fall too far behind their female peers. Males and females are both valuable but the gender roles are becoming reversed and it is an unsettling and confusing time for both men and women.

JasmineJun 03 2010 10:25pm

Mr Mike - this is not about me - I am insignificant in the grand scheme of things. I just try to interpret the trends.

JasmineJun 04 2010 5:12pm

Jasmine, I don't find it "unsettling" that women are earning a better position for themselves in society. What I find unsettling is the attitude towards men on this board - that they should just accept their place and sit down in the street with a burka on, so to speak. Teaching this to children will have a severely detrimental effect on a young boy's self esteem. Not because he's been beat out by a female, which is an incredibly sexist point of view in itself, but that he is incapable because he is male. That's the position that the feminazi bitches who advocate female supremacy advocate. Also, there are some bitch males in the femdom community who see themselves as worthless and buy into this crap about being a lowly male worm. As far as the statistics go, yes women may be over taking men in universities, but I don't see it as anything but a natural balancing out. Of course, it won't be 50/50 but do you honestly see society becoming completely female dominated? It's unrealistic to believe that one gender could so dominate the other by sheer natural ability. Our male dominated society has been unnaturally preserved and a female dominated society would require the same type of control to keep men down. One thing that concerns me about young men is the immaturity and idiocy I see among the group. For whatever reason, they do seem to be getting more irresponsible as time goes on. If that trend continues then I can see a scenario where women will assume most of the leadership positions but it will never be total. Remember, the greatest geniuses our world has ever known have been predominantly men. If there is a crisis with males performing poorly in schools I think it is a cultural and social problem amongst young males, not a male defect and it can be corrected. As for the women who need to see themselves as superior to men, think about this quote from psychologist Nathaniel Branden: "There in no greater sign of poor self esteem than the need to see some other group as inferior". Could that not be what is really going on here, ladies?

PatJun 04 2010 5:26pm

Jasmine, just a short interlude before I launch in to yet another tirade: you need glasses if you really have fallen hook-line-and-sinker for these seemingly endless amorphous "trends" that you continually abuse like wet clay to fit what ever mold you require at the moment and then go on to use to further distort reality as most of us know it. As I recall you did in fact make this precisely about YOU by seperating your self out from your birth sex and using that as license to bash the rest of us who are genetically male and not at all unhappy about it! Then with a swipe of your fake, Lee Press On Nails, you pronounced the entire male sex as being beyond redemption (As if you qualify in even the most meager fashion as Spokes-Tranny Of The Year for the gender that you so resent not being a member of.) I have reached the conclusion, as I have stated in previous posts, that many of the men who frequent this page require daily doses of inferiority complex mixed and stirred with the accompanying emasculation that is the natural outcome of it, as a sexual aphrodisiac, in order to get it up and function with the very sex that you admit being so mismatched with. Talk about your self fulfilling prophesy! But then my Dear Jazz, defeat is your raison d'etre. Thus real issues of great societal importance are now the lube you require to create the necessary friction needed for your idea of heterosexual communion. Get up off your knees, Almost Girl! I'm not buyin' what your selling!!!

Mr. MikeJun 04 2010 7:11pm

Pat, I don't WANT a female dominated world and I'm not saying that males are worthless. Clearly a gender that has until recently been completely dominant and has largely constructed the civilisation we take for granted and is largely responsible for all scientific and cultural progress has the skills to flourish. However, what I am saying that since the 70's the rise of women has been phenomenal and the results are as I have described previously where women are gaining the upper hand in education and in the workplace and gender role reversal is happening. It is unsettling for women as they are having to take on the responsibility of earning the money along with the guilt that they are not there for their children. I've heard that women actually resent a spouse who cannot match her income and such relationships usually unravel. It is unsettling for a man to become a "kept man" who perceives he has failed in the role he was brought up to fulfil as Protector and Breadwinner and is instead dependent on the female he was brought up to provide for. The loss of status amongst his male peers who are successful as breadwinners is also hard to come to terms with but at least most men in that position are saying that they are loving being able to be with their kids. Everyone, male or female should be allowed their full potential but at the moment women are proving to be more successful at this than men and we are in a state of transition of the traditional gender roles. Neither role - breadwinner or homemaker is an easy one - but a male ot female can fill either role as required it's just that traditional gender stereotyping values the breadwinner more than the homemaker and as more males become homemakers they perceive themselves as failures when most are in fact successful husbands and fathers.

JasmineJun 05 2010 7:33am

Mr Mike - I really don't know what to say (or if, indeed, there is any point in me responding to you at all). You clearly regard me as an objectionable creature whose opinions have no value or merit. I accept your opinion but do not agree with it.

JasmineJun 05 2010 7:41am

Ok Jasmine, I think I understand your point - women are making strides in society. Fair enough. Again, I think it's only natural due to more opportunity being afforded women. What I'm saying is that the number of women in top positions will hit a critical mass and the headway they may be gaining on men will cease as a more natural balance sets in. The gains they have made may seem astronomical, and they are in a sense, but it is due to there being so few women in leading roles previously, followed by an explosion of opportunity. They've had a lot of room for improvement. The growth can not continue at such a rate. Understand my point? I don't think anyone should feel threatened by it, though I do understand that some women earn more money than their husbands. So be it. Those men will deal with that in their own way. In a world of equal opportunity, obviously there will be some households where the woman is the main breadwinner. I just think it's delusional on the part of women and men who want to see the relatively few women who are in top positions as some kind of sign that women are dominating society. It's selective filtering of data, in my opinion.

PatJun 05 2010 10:16am

Jasmine, I hardly find you objectionable. Friends with gender-identification issues are an important part of my life. Again, Dear Boy, it is you that finds maleness and yes, particularly your own maleness, to be a self-loathsome badge of dishonor. It is you that feels it necessary to heap your own gender-dysfunction and inability to accept your maleness, upon others as though your experience applies to any one with a penis and scrotum. Your sad fate thus seals the fate of ALL males, Further, it is your choice of coping mechanisms that I find so repugnant. That you spout out your disdain for boys and men with such gleeful venom on a page so easily accessible to young impressionable minds of both genders and do so with an impunity born from fear and what should be, personal, sexual gratification, only adds to the revulsion and pity I feel toward your unfortunate mind set. You simply are not the go-to authority on inter-gender issues that your obvious overwhelming need for female dominance has convinced you that you are. You incorrectly quote data constantly. I, with great reluctance spent most of last evening here in Phoenix, Arizona, under a whirling ceiling fan, sipping on a Diet Coke, perusing your previous posts. I needn't have bothered. Just reading one sentence of your over-the-top anti-male diatribes suffices as a synopsis of all else that follows. I found still more sensationalized poppy-c*ck containing several errors. For instance: In your last post-Jack entry you claim with a scientific certainty that men are limited to "just one (brain) hemisphere." Jazz,Jazz,Jazz! What are we to do with you? Again I found flashing before my eyes, the altogether unsavory image of you lolling about the house, tongue hanging out, highly aroused, attired in some horrifically frilly frock whilst wallowing in such untruths! Males, in fact "tend to process data and external stimuli through one hemisphere at a time, using both halves even if the process is a bit slower. I see this as one side filtering out useless and superfluous irrelevancies - a facet of the male brains generally greater ability to focus. Then we have your last response to Pat, in which you belatedly adopt a more conciliatory tone. This says it all. Suddenly as if struck by a bolt from the Blue you switch gears and profess a desire to see the impending reversal of gender roles, as a mutually agreeable and acceptable one of our evolving socioeconomic reality. But a few posts up, we find you writhing about foaming at the mouth in rapturous delight at the subjugation and ergo, degradation of your brother males worldwide as we assail you with pleas for help in deciding which mini goes with those impossible to coordinate Bombay Blue wedgies we inadvertently and with your prior approval, picked out of a catalog last Heldengedenktag! What gives? Only since Pat (for whom I do not speak and Whom does not need my assistance) and I have dared contradict your feverish masturbatory nonsense have you begun to employ a different tact. To the very last woman, all of my hetero female friends read this page as "sheer nonsense." They have known all their lives that their gender tends to have an edge over the boys and men in their lives. The difference is they are not out to conquer the world. They don't need to. A truly gifted person knows it and carries themselves accordingly. You harp on and on offering no solutions for the unwary boy who might happen upon this trivial little Boo-Hoo pulpit of yours. A bit of advice, go to Infoplease.com and check out the Average (U.S.A) SAT Scores, 1972-2007. The boys still outscore the girls in math and VERBAL! Go figure... if you can spare that extra hemisphere!

Mr. MikeJun 05 2010 11:09am

Pat - I agree that to suggest a female dominated society is unrealistic. Males and females have more similarities than differences and there will always be some brilliant males (and females) who will stand out as being exceptional in all fields. Both males and females possess the skills necessary to be good workers and an all-male or all-female workforce will never happen and although there may be an imbalance between the genders at various points of time, this should not be a major problem. I now see that what is happening is equality (or as close to it as possible) with the most talented women taking the roles that belong to them and some displaced males adjusting to full time fatherhood and the loss of their status as breadwinner. Eventually, I hope that attitudes will change and both men and women will not feel devalued by being homemakers rather then breadwinners.

JasmineJun 05 2010 2:24pm

Welcome home Jazz! Talking sense looks good on you - certainly better than a dress.

Mr. MikeJun 05 2010 2:29pm

Mr Mike - I'm glad that you don't find me totally beyond the pale. Although admittedly I do like my frocks and underwear as horrifically frilly as possible, as I am a very feminine male, I have enough self control to focus on the facts and not use them as a tool for my sexual fantasises. However, looking back on your previous posts I am struck by the very first one you posted which says that we males should stop deluding ourselves that we are the superior sex and you refer to girls' more sophisticated brains, stamina, sensory perception and sexual power as compared to males and in your second post you call males lazy, lame and stupid. Sounds to me like our perceptions are pretty similar! The way I see it is not that females are necessarily superior (although they are in some ways) but as I maintained in a previous post males' attitude is the crucial factor and at present the signs are that males, when compared to females, are demotivated, complacent and passive so whilst I concede that they might have the skills to succeed without the right attitude it is difficult to utilise those skills. That said there are a lot of clever boys and girls out there it's just that at present it's the girls who are doing better.

JasmineJun 05 2010 2:50pm

OMG! Am I to believe that I am speaking to the Great Jasmine, live and in full-on drag persona? I am all but humbled. Please allow me to clarify my position. I have participated in a local university sponsored gender study since 2000. Some of the facts I have discovered about female biological superiority have come directly from this study and would scare the pants off many an insecure boy or man. Other facts and data have been gleaned directly off the internet- and Dearest Jazz, we both know what a bizarre realm that can be! The net is crawling with so-called experts. I have never denied female biological advantage. But even at that, men have managed to narrow the gender longevity gap as more and more women take on nasty male habits such as cigarette smoking and the risky world of the work place - which you seem to see as nothing but a plus for them. As I see nothing to be gained by the deliberately effeminization of boys, to likewise encourage girls to act like boys would be just as detrimental. Great learners that girls are, what a pity if they do not learn from our mistakes. We must remain individuals. On the intelligence front, I simply do not agree that girls have an insurmountable intellectual superiority over males. The data says the exact opposite. Now if we're talking motivation, I must agree that girls are moving along side boys in many ways and pulling ahead in a few. But isn't that to be expected from the majority of the worlds population after eons of oppression? Add to that the deliberate abandonment of boys in and out of the classroom. We simply do not value boys as much as we do girls and we do an abysmal job of protecting them against life's unpredictable surprises. I am convinced, since my straight gal-pals tell me everything, that women want men to be strong - not necessarily arrogant as many are and certainly not acting "superior", to coin the favorite by-word on this page. They want self-reliant men capable of independent thought. They realize there is nothing to be gained in females assuming the dominant role in society at the cost of rendering one-half of it mute and by merely transferring the shackles and limitations imposed upon females by male fear and inadequacy onto a whole new crop of boys. Putting a man in a dress (nothing new by the way for us Fags!) may fulfill some peoples thirst for revenge - just desserts, as it were - and it certainly provides a sexual catalyst for the simpering, already mentally castrated fembots that are legion on pages such as this. But NO woman that I know (other than my dyke neighbors), finds such a tawdry, punitive and self serving scenario even remotely appealing. You are lucky my Dear Jazz to have found so appreciative and receptive an audience! I must ask, aren't the women-half of these skewered equations merely giving their house-hubbys just another outlet to gain their peculiar notion of sexual gratification? Haven't women always been held responsible for assuaging the tempest-in-a-teapot that hangs between our legs like a latent umbilical cord waiting to be fed? How have things changed then? The fact that such a shift puts a strap-on dildo on the woman only means more work for her literally and otherwise! It does indeed seem, dominant or submissive, we simply have another case of men using women to douse their sexual fires. Lazy men are hardly a rarity, but these blokes-in-frilly-drag have somehow managed to outwit their supposedly smarter wives and girlfriends in to perpetuating their new found lives of leisure, pedicures and cucumber facials. I like being used by my boyfriends, but I get back what I give or else I simply stop the merry-go-round and stop giving. My friend Stella thinks "allowing my man to sit on his ass in cold cream and curlers all day just so I can go out and work my ass off only to come home and reward him by dominating an easy orgasm out of him - is not a relationship - it's reverse slavery with the slave being the real one in charge! Let the idiot call Rent-a Dominatrix! I need a foot rub!" I'll let a (real) woman have the last word this time. Jasmine, thank you for your response. We might both learn to tolerate the differences of others from this. Oh, by the way, it's 107 degrees out of doors, so I'll be nearby, huddled under my fan...

Mr. MikeJun 05 2010 4:34pm

Mr Mike - I entirely agree with many of the above items and have come to the conclusion that whilst girls are superior to boys in some ways, the opposite is also true. Boys have more energy and are more naturally inclined to doing things rather than reading. Girls mature faster and are more inclined towards study (there are many more examples, I'm sure but I'd like to keep this brief. As I said in my last posts a female dominated society (or, indeed a male one) won't benefit us ultimately. Males and females have different qualities and are best when they work together not trying to dominate one another, although there will always be gender politics in any relationship - it's a fact of life. Women, held back for centuries, are understandably taking full advantage of the opportunities now open to them and have done incredibly well but feminists maintain there is still some way to go. Males have suffered as a result of these social changes but that is to expected as males in what is a quiet revolution going on in the background and I agree with Pat that ultimately things will even out and we will get as close to equality as possible. Women are flourishing, so there needs to be help, especially for boys in the classroom to help males fulfil their potential - they are as entitled as any female to realise their full potential and I hope govts around the world act soon to help boys but not to the detriment of girls. Thanks for your stimulating and informative posts, Mr Mike.

JasmineJun 06 2010 12:59am

Jasmine, isn't this kind of open discussion and exchange of ideas exactly what is needed to expose gender stereotypes for the nonsense that they are? I really appreciate your open minded quest for the truth. Likewise, I would feel less than honest if I did not admit that you have opened my mind to the reality facing many effeminate men such as your self. I have been a practicing and nearly universal homosexual since the age of nine (save for a few sad experiments inside vagina's where I freely admit my performance (stamina) was DEFINITELY the inferior one!). I tend more toward the masculine end of the continuum that we all find ourselves strung out upon. That does not discount the lives of my brothers at the other extreme of the spectrum. To be honest I find slightly feminine men fascinating and attractive. There! I'm out of that closet! As a gay man, however I see no need for men to hand their inferiority over to women on a silver platter. I have done quite well with out women running my life. My Gay male friends thrive equally as well. Our more regimented, less malleable male brains have adapted easily to take on all the tasks and responsibilities that are often seen as the purview of women. Yet without the cost to our male egos and self-esteem that I find to be so prevalent on pages such as this. We are also not held hostage to the females much stronger and yes, enviously (!!!) superior, sexual response. With another man sex is a more perfect union and not at all as defeating and exhausting as I and many other men in the Gender Study found it to be with a woman. There is no clitoris to be intimidated by! Competing with women in the work place has never been much of an issue for me (I am an embalmer). So too worry about stacking up my skills next to those of a woman's has no real-time experience for me. I will admit, while I'm taking advantage of your incredible gift for open mindedness, that, low those many years ago in Mortuary Science School, the then rare, girls who had enrolled, not only outscored me on most of the various tests that we took in class, but embarrassingly, the savvy girls outscored ALL of the other boys in a field that had long been a bastion of men. That did not stop me from excelling at my craft. It just took me a little longer. Like many boys today I did not go to a four-year college. I think it is great that so many girls are, so long as we do not see college education totally feminized against boys as has happened in the elementary through secondary system. 2009 SAT scores suggest that this has not happened. Despite girls being 53.5% of the test pool, their average score dropped 5 points to 1496 - 27 points below the male average of 1523! In 2009 the gap in math increased to 35 points in favor of boys after five years of girls narrowing their lead! Thus even with our anti-male classrooms and predominantly female teaching staff, the more reptilian male brain has still some how managed to hold it's own and actually defy the common wisdom(?) that relegates boys, lock, stock and barrel to the bottom of the scholastic heap! Imagine the possibilities if we separated gender education! Evidently the male brain is not the desiccated waste land that many have been falsely led to believe it to be. In the aforementioned and, my apologies, constantly harped on, Gender Study, we learned that females have 9 times more white matter while males have 6 times more gray matter. Gray matter is involved in the brains information processing centers, while white matter is involved in the business of transferring information between different parts of the brain. Sounds like boys have their advantage and girls have theirs as well. This validates my earlier post where I asserted my belief that where one gender leaves off the other is at it's side ready to continue on. That the female brain is more sophisticated and certainly more limber, recovering language skills faster after a stroke, for instance, is undeniable. But some how the male brain soldiers on. Yes the girls enjoy earlier physical and mental maturity, but that is not the end of the saga. Psychologist J. Phillipe Rushton of the University of Western Ontario found in a study that males had an I.Q. advantage of 4 points in the 17 to 18 age group. Research suggests this advantage is due to "extra male neurons" in the male brain. This was found "through out the entire distribution of scores, in every level of family income; for every level of fathers' and mothers' education and for each of the seven ethnic groups." He went on to state that " It's a biological fact that the slower to mature male eventually catches up with and surpasses the female." Jasmine, you might want to rethink your recent post to Pat where you suggest that boys "never" catch up to girls. Clearly these are complex issues that cannot be resolved by a few "studies" or, as is common on this post, in the bedroom as part of our inter-personal sexual relationships. And, REALLY, why should something as enjoyable as sex be bollixed up in this debate? I'm sure many of the "femdomites" on this post would sooner have my head in a hatbox rather than suffer the perspective of a middle aged (but well preserved - hey, it's all that formaldehyde at work!) homosexual that is assumed to both despise and fear women. The truth has set me free! I don't need women so to hate on them would be a waste of the time that I love to devote to men. This does not excuse me from the human bond I share with the female sex. As long as I get that respect in return it's quite alright with me if they assume their rightful place as co-combatants in this ultimate game of survival that we call life. Just don't ask me to keep score.

Mr. MikeJun 06 2010 2:43pm

Jasmine, has this post become so about only you and me, or what? Should we give it a rest and let others have their say? Or, are we the only two still caught up in all this mishegas? Your the submissive bottom (in other words, the one whose really in charge!), you tell me.

Mr. MikeJun 06 2010 2:54pm

I agree we should give others a chance to have their say.

JasmineJun 07 2010 11:25am

Carry on then!

Mr. MikeJun 07 2010 12:33pm

A few months ago, my wife and I were riding in the back seat of a car. Our good friends were in front with the man driving and the woman in the passenger seat. There was a political talk show playing on the radio to which I was trying to listen. The two women talked quite a bit and I would join in their conversation from time to time. The male driver seemed to be concentrating on driving. I started to get frustrated because I found it difficult to follow both the womens' conversation and also what was on the radio. I said that we should decide if we are going to talk or if we a are going to listen to the radio program, one or the other. The women chuckled and said they had no problem following both the conversation and the radio. My wife said, "Girls are better multi-taskers". Does this story have any relation to the idea that women are able to use both sides of their brains at the same time while men must use one side or the other? Would like to hear from women and men on this one.

JackJun 11 2010 7:25pm

06/11/2010. Jack, if I may. It is really quite simple. If you need a brain capable of devoting 100% focus to a subject or debate - you're in the market for a male brain. If, on the other hand, you need to split your attention and allot, say 50% toward two subjects or tasks simultaneously, then the female brain is your answer. Funny isn't it, how Mother Nature designed the two to be complimentary pieces of the duo-gender human race. Yet one must wonder why, in all her wisdom she chose not to arm either sex with both brain patterns? Likewise, one has to wonder, then, how women can find the female pattern to be inherently superior when you consider that, they are, like males, only endowed with one-half of the whole puzzle. Now that "focus" driven scientists have proven the ages old male reverse logic to be just as flawed, we should rely on one another and quit quibbling over such nonsense as who can heat a can of soup and change a diaper and have a chat on the telephone. I think most women will admit that they have such an easy time multi-tasking precisely because they are devoting those talents to fairly mundane and repetitious tasks - the things men either don't "focus" on or ignore. I wouldn't want a my doctor going over my test results while talking on the phone to his mother about Dad's surprise birthday party this weekend and giving Nurse Penelope the eye. Plus, Jack, I really don't think it is all that impossible to train ones self to "focus" or "multi-task". The human brain is extremely adaptable and resilient. People all the time take on new careers after forty. Many go back to school. A brain is not inferior to another brain until it's owner is dead and can no longer use it. So tell the wife to come down off her high horse and chill and while she's at it, to fetch a beer and order in Chinese take-away! And while you're at it, please see my previous posts which are devoted, in large part to exactly this debate.

Mr. MikeJun 11 2010 8:17pm

YOU GO, MR. MIKE! Wow! Singlehandedly you have transformed this page from WANK-O-RAMA into a forum for serious discussion. All these cross-dressing whimpy guys have taken a hike. They are not missed and are such a turn off. I am lesbian but even I can appreciate a real man from placebo skirt wearing freaks. I must thank you again as I have avoided this post lately because of the level the posts have plummeted to. You came along and have the BALLS to be honest AND informed, even when reporting facts that prove boys are inferior to girls. I've taken the trouble to check many of your facts and in most cases you are spot on. I have also found posts from you on other pages and I like how you can admit that men are biologically inferior. Any man who can open up about his sexual ineptness, is a man who deserves to be taken seriously. These other guys need to learn from you, though, as I suspect they are still male enough under their mini's to feel like you have betrayed them and they hardly need your advice. Keep it up, boy. A female fan...

TeriJun 12 2010 12:23pm

06/12/2010. Teri, sweetie, the checks in the mail! But must you gush on and on? I'll still be blushing on my birthday (8/17 - cards and gifts, welcome). Careful honey or you'll ruin my reputation - LESBIANS on my side!!! Egad! Who knew?

Mr. MikeJun 12 2010 12:32pm

Teri, your comments about Mr Mike are valid but I take exception to your comment about us feminine males being freaks. Yes, I wear a mini-skirt, dainty lingerie and high heels but that does not make me any less of a man, merely a male who is capable of expressing his feminine side, so please don't condemn me.

JasmineJun 13 2010 10:11pm

Jasmine, I deliberately did not mention anyone by name precisely because I do not think all men are on the same sinking ship as you have stated. You are probably the most vocal voice in that corner on this post. I take heat all the time since I look like a man, but it's a choice, not some predestined gender outcome. I look ridiculous dressed like you prefer for your self and decided long ago not to fight it. I did not do so because of sexual role-playing or because my gender is on the ascendancy. I also did not abandon being every bit a woman! The more I've thought all this out, the more I realize that, my aversion to penises and all things sexually male, I still have a lot to learn about men. Mr. Mike at least, seems willing to talk without bowing down or taking a superior tone with people like you who are so pigeon-holed in your way of thinking. Plus he makes me laugh! And, yes, much of his humor is aimed directly at himself and men in general. Sorry for the Groupie Adoration Society thing I have going on Mr. Mike, but when you're good - you're really good! The rest are merely second rate. And no, your head shall not end up in a "hatbox" as long as I'm around. Jasmine, drop a post and let me know what you think. I love the give and take.

TeriJun 14 2010 10:42am

06/13/2010. Now now, children! I will not have you fighting over me in some schoolyard like brawl, when there is clearly enough room on this post for many opinions, even those that differ so abhorrently from my own and are therefore flawed from the get-go! Now, really! It was never my intention to belittle Jasmine's outlook on life, nor assemble a cadre of Fierce Lesbian Separatist castration fanatics (oh yeah, different page)to march in torch lit parades, severed penises and scrotums hung about their underdeveloped chests (I'll pay for that one!) like war trophies. Dearest Jasmine, my oldest, closest friend (?) on this page. I think what Teri was getting at in the post that so offended you, was that she has been able to comfortably cross-dress as a man with out consigning her entire gender to a similar and nothing close to a, desired, future. You would have all males sold down the river to a feminine fate. But, in your defense, Teri had not divulged her butch status in her previous posts. Too bad our bylines do not include a small, tasteful, lovely little photo, isn't it? Maybe LikeLike can get on that straight away. I'll need weeks to pick out a mug shot from the thousands I have on hand. Sorry, most of them show me naked and in some degree of arousal, other wise I'd send out a bunch to those of you that must have developed an image of Our Mr. Mike as some sort of troll living under a freeway overpass in the Arizona heat. When in fact, it will please at least Teri to know, I am regarded as all-sorts of gorgeous by the men down at Charlie's Country & Western gay bar here in The Desert Metropolis. Between you and me, I avoid the place like the plague! Why, the last time I went I was all but raped, finding myself as popular as a hooker at a Viagra convention. I, like Teri, am a butch looking gay man, except for the anatomically apropos sexual devices suspended precariously between my legs and coveted so earnestly by castration bitches on another post I frequent. So let's all get along, shall we? Teri, I don't know what to say or how to respond to you. Maybe you are a closet heterosexual (YIKES!). Let's see how things progress. Are you state-side or U.K.? Either way, Wiedersehen...

Mr. MikeJun 14 2010 11:28am

If you are interested in seeing how the power between the sexes is swinging decisively in favour of women google "The end of Men" a current article in The Atlantic magazine - it makes very interesting reading.

JasmineJun 20 2010 8:23am

Jasmine, excellent article - thanks for the heads up! I must point out, nary a mention or even a word about men clad in frilly knickers, push-up bras or other traditional female regalia! Instead an honest assessment of one author's slant on a changing gender landscape. Now we males must learn to accept this as liberation from the ages old slavery of patriarchal expectation. As a Gay man I parted those waters long ago and made it safely to the other shore. Embrace change. Just don't run out and buy up all those stockings and stilettos yet!

Mr. MikeJun 20 2010 4:46pm

You're welcome,Mr Mike. It is an excellent article and the only issue I have with it is the title - not so much the end of men as the end of male dominance and the beginning of an age of equal opportunities for all.

JasmineJun 20 2010 9:29pm

Jasmine I couldn't agree more! No where in the article did I find any factual evidence that "The End Of Men" is nigh upon us. I see it as you do - rather a long overdue adjustment in the status quo. Women can only do men a favor by taking on more of the stresses found in the workplace. Let them die of early heart attacks and take up smoking, drinking and carousing till all-hours in male strip clubs! I think they will find this dominance thing is not all it's been cracked up to be. Most of what we are seeing, however, is more and more women stuck in the same dead-end service industry jobs that men had been relegated too. These are the same jobs that the article states men have lost. Women will often work for less and have merely supplanted the more expensive males of a generation ago. I don't see many people of either gender moving up. The world economy simply will not allow women to excel as men once did simply because those jobs no longer exist in our call-center economy where all the good jobs have been shipped overseas to India and the once supreme American & European manufacturing hegemony has been superseded by China. Let Indian women learn English faster than men! A job listening to irate cellphone customers cussing them out in the Queen's vernacular will be their only reward. Where I do think women will succeed is in the reshaping of a society too long tilted in the direction of one gender at the expense of the other. This will not be achieved, however, by neglecting boys, as is the case in most of the developed world today. There should be enough to go around. We must not move girls up the ladder by tossing boys off. We must also remember that the much ballyhooed demise of the male is at best premature so long as the world has cultures and (so-called) religions as those still to be found in Asia and Africa and even here in America. Women and Gay men are still on the run in those places but our star is on the horizon. Jasmine, I want to personally thank you for expanding my horizons. Together we are precisely the reason why men are still so very worth while!

Mr. MikeJun 21 2010 12:38pm

Mr Mike, whilst I enjoyed the article I found it very very pessimistic and somewhat bleak and negative towards us males. It is undeniable that women have done incredibly well for themselves - just think, 100 years ago their lives and opportunities were so restricted - and now, as the article shows, their advance in the last 30 years or so has been so rapid that it's little wonder some are talking of an inevitable matriarchy and that us males, reeling from the impact of recessions and social changes that have taken away our traditional jobs and roles and are struggling to make sense of the new order where the "little woman" now earns more than him and calls the shots in their relationship - but this is all very newsy and sensationalist and I'd agree with your comments that all that is happening is that some women are replacing some men in service jobs with long hours, low pay and even less respect. The economic system is what it is - does it honestly matter which gender controls it? And as for these women who want to "have it all" - well, they will just work themselves into an early grave as career woman, wife, mother, fashion goddess, weighed down with responsibility and taking little pleasure out of life and distrustful of the male who might be able to take some of the weight off, if she would just let him - is this really good for women? I just don't know - women will blast through the glass ceilings only to find that what their dream job is a nightmare. Humans are very adaptable. Both males and females. Females, fed up of being treated as second class citizens, adapted and worked to earn their civil rights which in turn led to greater opportunities. Males are just as capable of bouncing back from the inevitable consequences of female emancipation and progress and astounding changes in the economy over the last 30 years that have been unprecedented and have hit men hard but we will adapt, as women once had to, to survive and progress in the new order that is seeing the death of patriarchy and (perhaps) the dawn of a new age of equality where it no longer matters whether a man or woman brings home the bacon or minds the kids. Males and females are just as valuable and must be given the same opportunties to succeed. I hope to live long enough to see such a society. Thank you, Mr Mike, for openning my mind also. We men are still worthwhile.

JasmineJun 21 2010 4:00pm

Now you've got me all misty-eyed! Good thing it's you who wears the mascara and not me (talk about a scary tableau!). Soldier on, darling! I'll hold up things here on my end...

Mr. MikeJun 21 2010 5:06pm

Mr.Mike, you and Jasmine have the market cornered on this post. The two of you think you have it all figured out. Trouble is neither of you is the typical male that women are so busy out-doing. Excuse my frankness but you're a fag and Jasmine is an admitted cross dressing wanna-be-woman! Hardly the mainstream even from my lesbian point of view. I don't think many women would argue that gay men and effeminate men are a cut above your average straight boy or man in almost all respects. But I also do not believe that most women regard men like you and Jasmine as necessarily inferior. I see guys like the two of you as a missing link between the genders. I'm sure you never expected to be lumped in to the same category as a transvestite like Jasmine, but you both have more in common than you might think. You may be at polar opposites in the masculine-feminine continuum but you are both beginning to sound like twins in your posts. It's like you are both caught in the crossfire of the battle-of-the-sexes, when in fact you have already developed the solutions in your personal lives, required for men and women to do more than just co-exist. It's great fun watching this post's mostly male respondents duke it out in an effort to knock their own gender down so a "Mr.Mike" like savior can come along - a modern day messiah for men, and turn things around. But believe it or not most women are to busy being superior to care about it. It's always been this way. Men act like women and men have only just discovered the female edge. Boys! We've known it all along. It is born within us not exported through nonsense like the male ego, fist fights, wars and who has the biggest dick and the heaviest balls. So, I really miss the great fun I used to have reading what was then, the diametrically opposed Jasmine-Mr.Mike dialogue, now that the two of you are so much on the same page. I guess I'm hoping for a new Mr.Mike antagonist to come along and ruffle some of those feathers that Jasmine no doubt wears. Until then...

TeriJun 22 2010 7:25pm

Uh, Jasmine, sweetie - I'll let you field our joint, joined-at-the-hip, response. Teri only called me one name (fag). She called you two (cross dressing wanna be woman & tranny). Your honor has therefore been far more egregiously besmirched than my own. I've certainly been called worse, though never to my face. Still I think in her heavy handed, dykish sort of way she was paying the two of us a complement. That said, now that I think about it she did cast an evil undertow toward straight males and there in might have slandered you thrice. So let's see if you've earned those spiky Lee Press-on nails. As an embalmer, of course I shall expect blood! I am officially in hiding,forthwith.

Mr. MikeJun 22 2010 7:51pm

Teri - Mr Mike and I (and more rarely yourself) have become the only voices on this post - where is everybody - we want to hear your opinions. You make it sound like it is a bad thing to be either a homosexual male or a cross-dresser who wants to be a woman. I can't speak for Mr Mike, but as for myself I rejoice that I am in touch with my feminine side and I have a lot of fun with it but I admit that we are not typical of the male gender (as you are not typical of the female gender as a lesbian). Some women would find me a disgusting parody of themselves, others would love my willingness to dress and act like a woman but most would probably be indifferent. Cross-dressing and indeed homosexuality and lesbianism are more tolerated now. I don't regard myself as being inferior to women (I hold two university degrees) although I often fantasise about being a pretty, submissive maid to a woman, but that is just a fantasy. It's just that women are doing so well and men seem to be falling by the wayside in the wake of recessions and social changes and have lost the drive and motivation that women seem to have in spades right now. Us males being in touch with our feminine sides is no bad thing especially in a world that is becoming increasingly feminised. I like your spirit Teri.

JasmineJun 23 2010 11:40am

06/23/2010. And not a drop of blood! Well done Jasmine. I knew I was trading barbs and thought provoking ideas with an educated man. For the future, do you prefer to be referred to as a man or a woman? My god, Mr. Mike has gone all politically correct on us! What's next - Lilith Festival?

Mr. MikeJun 23 2010 1:25pm

Jasmine, I think this post has been abandoned by others precisely because they were using posts such as this to masturbate their latent feelings of male inferiority out into the semi open of a forum such as this. Wow, I'm starting to sound like Mr.Mike now!

TeriJun 23 2010 1:31pm

But, as I meant to add, you and Mr.Mike have taken the discussion up a notch or two. Not really good jerk off material, if you know what I mean.

TeriJun 23 2010 1:34pm

Poor little things. All of you. Turn off the telly and get back to reality. Media and fake realities are what is keeping you from living your lives . Thinking of female superiority. Give me a break. If that was to be possible even as a recreational activity females would have been built stronger bodies and more testosterone running through their veins. And we all know that to be impossible (even in a drug abuse scenario). The problem with you girls, or should I say teenagers (be cause that is what you are, isn't it), is that you have been brainwashed by a society whose values are shaped on couches, plasma TVs and playstations. Get real, go back to living in the jungle, be yourself, find your real self, the one forgotten, or never known, let nature have its course and you'll find out that whatever you call female superiority is just another word for bored and mental disorder. Let the boys be boys and be what you were born to be. Stop trying to be something else. Stop this mental jerkoff now, for your own sake. If you really dislike your being female so much grow a penis. Try Brazil. If you are in fact really proud to be a female than, why, why by any logical means would anyone wish to incarnate personality tracts, even features, that are "proper" (and that's according to you) of males?? Are you stupid or what? THINK THINK Out of the box and you'd understand eventually that those tv shows, action movies (and now even on literature..), are showing you what "They" want you to become. "They" want you to hate each other, to procreate less, because "They" want this planet for Themselves. Ethnic rage, race fear, and now even psychological sex disorders (like your cases) created ad artem by a pull of evil men (and women of course) at the center of the power. Fight back! You are not Buffy the Vampire Slayer, that's a comedy show' it's fake reality that insinuates in young girls (and boys) like you the idea of alternative reality abstracting you from the real one, in which you have a natural tendency to live in. Do not waste your time (and risk your life) by going to demonstrations, giving them reason to hit you, blame you for creating disorders in the streets and generally speaking for being that stupid, to think that you would change anything with those actions. It's a mental revolution that you all seek, that you all need. A revolution that would reverse the devolution that is being perpetrated since the first revolution. They drive those events wherever and however they want. What you can do, for yourselves and for the benefit of your children and the future generations, is to shield your brains and keep your personality form transforming in some kind of human reject that hates herself (hence the mental jerk off on females here and there..) at a point that she would never find happiness, satisfaction, enjoy life, and sex. That is their final aims mates. THINK THINK Be girls, stay females. The real kind. The natural kind. No need to be coached on it. Just let nature have its course.

A ManJun 23 2010 8:25pm

Well, there you have it! We asked for fresh input and now we've got it! All in the guise, of course, of someone whom presumes to know our deepest tempests and turmoils. And that based solely on our, oft I must admit, "chicken-little-the-sky-is-falling rants on an inconsequential post replete with such hysteria. Are we taken maybe a touch too seriously? Was that mostly directed at Teri? If so, I must object to "A Man" and his basis for such a highly personalized broadside of the only woman, of late, to add real substantive discourse to our little corner of the world. As for Jasmine and myself (and do forgive me Jasmine, old girl, for putting words in your mouth), neither of us seems to be on the horns of an identity crisis. If anything we are two lads that have it all figured out! Plus I hear an echo of my own misgivings as to the sad state of this post as I initially found it. Too many men have given up, as Jasmine very recently pointed out a few posts up, and resigned themselves and the balance of maledom to an ineffectual fate as servants and handmaidens. Of course "A Man" offers no real answers, preferring to scold, in a nunnish sort of schoolmarm tone, those of us cowering amidst all these societal changes that he assures us we must have cooked up out of the thin air of the self imposed asylums we've only just escaped from. One thing I learned from my earlier interactions with Jasmine, was never to spend too much time in your own head. The world is full of other people and I, in no way have even scratched the surface of all the complexities that involves. I hope we hear more from our new headmaster and soon. Apparently we need his guidance to find our way from one post to the next.

Mr. MikeJun 24 2010 6:01pm

A Man's vision of what men and women should be reads very much like the male should be a backwoodsman/caveman, hunting and gathering and the female should be the idealised 50's housewife in her frilly apron and baking cookies for her husband and children. I can't imagine ANYONE male or female buying into what he is suggesting. Men and women have moved beyond those narrow sterotypes and anyway those sterotypes are way out of step with the modern world. Thanks for your contribution A Man (well, I DID ask for it in in my last post!) but I fear that we will have to agree to disagree on a lot of points. Women want more than motherhood and being a housewife and based on current evidence are better equipped and motivated to thrive in the education system and economy than males. We males need to adapt or we will be left behind, it's as simple as that as women aren't going to give up their degrees and executive positions to don the apron again just to "fit" their gender role as you prescribe - women have progressed way beyond that and frankly their progress has been so rapid that it well be you - Mr Man - who ends up in the frilly apron when your education and your wage can't match that of your female partner, as a lot of males are finding now in the wake of the phenomenal success of women.

JasmineJun 24 2010 6:25pm

Mr Mike, I occupy a male body, but the soul within is female. Please refer to me as the female that I am inside. Thank you.

JasmineJul 03 2010 8:46am

That's what I thought - but it is always best to check. We fags have a host of nicknames, both flattering and derogatory, for one another. Hope all is well by you this fine day !

Mr. MikeJul 03 2010 9:56am

Mr Mike my life is just great right now and I hope yours is too!

Miss JasmineJul 03 2010 2:31pm

7/03/10. I like the new salutation : Miss! Let your Gyrrl flag fly! Enough with closets, gay or straight! The world is ours, male or female, to live out the life we choose. Yours affectionately...

Mr. MikeJul 03 2010 3:30pm

Teri, where the bloody 'ell are you, Dude?

Mr. MikeJul 03 2010 3:32pm

Mr. Mike, you and Jasmine need to hook up and get it over with! With egos like the two of yours, I'd like to see who would be left standing after "she" gets through balling your over inflated brains out in maybe 30 seconds flat. You two need to get over yourselves. But I'm still a big fan, Mikey, so don't go off and dash yourself on the rocks!

TeriJul 11 2010 2:06pm

7/11/10. HUH! Women must be smarter than men cuz I just don't get it, Teri my dear. You'll have to humor me with an explanation. In the meantime as I always say: Spare me the drama and bring me the dramamene!

Mr. MikeJul 11 2010 10:02pm

If you believe one sex is superior over another, then equality, and thus the foundations of feminism has already failed in the 21st century.

aussiebearSep 20 2010 4:44am

I don't believe women are superior to men. They can do just as bad as men. Look at the former CEO of Hewlett-Packard; Carly Fiorina. She almost killed HP before the HP Board fired her. It was up to the point where HP was living off selling ink cartridges! (She was more marketing oriented; where as the core foundations of HP was engineering oriented.) ...When she left, HP stock went up. Like all CEOs who are forced out, she got her "golden parachute": Over US$20 million in severance.

foxyladySep 20 2010 4:54am

Perhaps, but in a couple of months She could be a United States Senator.

obedient husbandSep 23 2010 7:14pm

Unlikely. They'll take one look at her resume and then drop her like she's diseased.

an intelligent life formOct 16 2010 5:36pm

Where am I?

Lost SoulNov 06 2010 12:37am

I can't beam you up unless you give me the trajectory.

ScottyNov 06 2010 12:44am

Ya know, I invented the internet.

Al GoreNov 06 2010 12:46am

I have to say one thing. what's with all the religion comments? I am Atheistic, so it makes very little sense to me, and I'd have to speak on a boilogical level. You say that woman is better because she was created last, and more complex? actually, the man was formed from the woman, thus he would be better. However, let's accept your idea. that God created everything, and that Genesis actually happened like they said. God created the sky and the earth first, didn't he? and hmankind last. After the many evils man has commited, thanks to "the apple" do you really think you can compare it to the beauty and purity that is nature. Simplicity is the greatest thing. thus, neither man, nor woman i better. Next time you see an androgynous person, tip your hat to them. They are superior.

AnonymousJan 13 2011 6:58pm

If women Supremacists really want to Rule they have to Serve ---Serve the Environment , Serve the Hungry , Serve the Oppressed ----Mother Goddess MahaKali does NOT suffer free-loaders ---even though Feminine Herself SHE is no Female Supremacist or Female Chauvinist ----you BE Good & Do Good ---SHE's all for you orelse you'll go down the drainpipe of History like Male Politicos Bush , Clinton , Berloscuni , Cescesceau ,Saddam to name a few HER credo is Clear ---Perform or get ASS-Whipped ---Male or Female it's all the same ---just to hear empty words "The Glorious Female Superior Sex BLAH BLAH BLAH ...." is allright but in front of the GLORIOUS ,RESPLENDENT , MAJESTIC ,MAGNIFICENT MOTHER - GODDESS - QUEEN OF ALL CREATION -----mere mortals your words ring hypocritical if not hollow ! Do Her , Serve Her creation & toy shall reign for centuries otherwise it's SHITCREEK for all your much vaunted superiority ,muscularity , academic excellence whatever ---it don't CUT NO ICE WITH HER !!!

Ashesh GhoseJan 18 2011 5:49am

a women belongs

AnonymousFeb 06 2011 4:46pm

Women should be seen naked and not heard

docholidayFeb 06 2011 4:47pm

women will never ever be equal to a man just as a man will never ever be equal to a woman.

docholidayFeb 06 2011 4:48pm

women will never ever be equal to a man just as a man will never ever be equal to a woman.

docholidayFeb 06 2011 7:38pm

males should be seen only in proper feminine attire and all they should hear is the taunting laughter of FEMALES...

OmphaleMar 08 2011 12:02pm

Human pheromones - Copulins ? Copulins are an exclusively female group of pheromones. There are secreted into the vagina at the optimum ratios during ovulation with the aim of encouraging men to desire to copulate. This group of pheromones primarily consists of fatty acids that would serve little to no function on there own, but in combination they have been shown to increase testosterone levels in men by 150% (Astrid Jutte study). This increase in testosterone may cause feelings of arousal in men if a woman is present. It is said that once a man smells Copulins on a woman she is deemed to be more attractive... It's a chemical that makes men horny not one that enables mind control..........

AnonymousMar 25 2011 2:33am

Man can't be no more than what he is made from, if anything he would be less, men come from a woman, most men are living their lives for a woman although many might not admitt to it, or some may not be aware of it. In all of nature the female rules, in the insect world, the females rule, amonst the life in the oceans, the females rule, amonst the birds of the sky, the females rule, in the world of all living creatures that walk the earth, the female rules. All creatures that are in tuned with their God given nature, are ruled by the female, she has the first and the last choice. The human race fell out of tune with their higher Godly nature a long,long,long time sgo.and started living life backward, upside-down, inside-out, just wrong, so wrong, and now we accept this wrong way of being, wrong way of thinking, wrong way of living as our socialy accepted way of life. not realizing that if we epitimize and seek to enhance and elavate the female, we would be elavating all the human race to hights unimaginable by the minds of man. Men might think they rule the world, but behind the vail woman rules, and the world would be nothing without a woman or a girl, keep this in mind, If were not for a woman, there would be no men.

The Bubble ManApr 04 2011 11:56am

The truly Androgynuos, functional- hermaphroditic person would be superior to both males and females or could I say be like-In the Image of God. Can you please open your minds and Expand your thinking?

The Bubble ManApr 04 2011 12:20pm

dear Bubble Man [Bubbles for short] if a couple practices Couple Chastity Yoga i.e. semen control ,no penetrative penis in vagina genital touching or intercourse that semen/ojas stored within the male makes the man very powerful , the couple more successful & after two children should be practised by all couples .so Bubbles try it out with Bubbly i.e. Mrs.Bubbles !!!

Ashesh GhoseApr 05 2011 11:15am

Dear Ashesh Ghose what you say has a lot of truth in it, the power is not necessarily physical it is mental/emotional and spiritual. Very few people realize that the sexual energies are grounded life's spiritual force, and are the powers of love that religious scriptures speak of,that one must contain and embrace,in order to rise above the lowly life nature, and regain higher quality life nature. The sexual force is the strongest of the emotions/passions in the humans nature,and most people are so addicted to the passionate nature they feel its only natural, and the greatest fight in life that one will have is with desire. Oh! by the way there is no Mrs.Bubbles, I'm waiting for us to blow into each others life.

Mr. BubblesApr 11 2011 2:33pm

Thank you Bubbles

Ashesh GhoseApr 15 2011 9:53am

You are very welcome Ashesh

BubblesApr 15 2011 11:26am

Listen to a woman,------------- for a change,------------- in the world.

The Bubble ManApr 15 2011 11:36am

As a first time poster, I'm prepared for some "hard" feedback...I do think that the notion of female superiority is being imprinted on the younger generation. The results of laws enacted to empower young women in all areas of school, including athletics, has developed a few generations of self-confident women who have proved themselves physically just like young men used to, whereas many young men are often discouraged from pursuing traditional athletics because they are too dangerous (e.g., football). In addition, young women have always done well in lower school grades, but because of the gender roles in vogue they often left higher education to males and pursued stay at home lives (My mom was better read and every bit as smart as my father, but not as much formal education). This situation has changed over the last 20-30 years, and women are seeking both advanced education (the statistics don't like, women are now better educated on average) which leads to more women in the workplace and greater advancement. Males on the other hand have been hit hardest by the recession and change in technology set which currently favors women. I should know - one of the young women I recruited 10 years ago to work for my company (I was her first supervisor) is now my manager, and I have to admit it's because she is more adept at handling the workforce that exists today (in my business, it's becoming increasing made up of more women). These are just the facts, and there is no denying it - at present there is an transfer of power from males to females that is both a result and an empowering agent to more female advancement relative to males. However, the decline of power by males is not necessarily a good thing, because we all stand to lose if any part of our society is held back or is not productive (this was certainly always true when women were constrained, and will be if the downward trend in male education, employement, skills, etc. are not corrected). I myself have started taking more classes to "catch up" to these ambitious and well-trained women, and my boss (she) is mentoring me now on my workplace effectiveness. Momentum is a powerful thing - it can and has empowered a whole generation of young women to advance, and by virtue of having so many successful role models, give inspiration to the talent within the next generation of young girls. However, momentum can also be like a millstone around the males of today who see fewer role models in the workplace (heaven help if Dad is out of work while Mom brings home the bacon), thus potentially imprinting them with negative stereotypes of their own worth and inferiority. I don't fundamentally believe this, but even if there is such a thing as innate female superiority, the gender gap that could result from these trends will be no less harmful than the one that preceded it. At least that's the way I see it.

DavidJun 02 2011 7:43am

Women have always been superior to men. I think it is just now that they realize it. As males we should acknowlege this and treat Women with the respect and honor they deserve!

FredJun 09 2011 5:47pm

Females are superior in popular culture at this juncture in history because Males have created a comfortable enough society for everyone to be able to relax in for awhile. Females are master manipulators as well as superior communicators. There are no more real impediments to women in society any more but somehow the only thing occurring is political correctness and favoritism for women & children. When females actually contribute tangible things such as solving the energy problem or inventing things that improve the lives of all humans then we can have a serious discussion about gender superiority. Until then we can keep pretending... and living in our Man made cities with electricity, central heating, toilets, beds, cars, espresso machines.... you get it. Ya! You Go Grrls!!

LimonJul 16 2011 3:01pm

I really don't believe females are superior to males and I sure hope that's never presented in any official capacity or political debate in the future. The thought of it is disgusting but I really wouldn't be suprised to see it brought to realization by radical feminists in the future who seem Hell bent on proving that female are superior to males in every way imaginable. But really all that's going on from what I can see is nothing who'd of pure straight up discrimination against boys and men. Last week, another woman chopped off her husband's penis and threw it into a garbage disposal. What sickened me more was turnin on the TV and seeing a group of women sitting around and laughing about it! How men have become so lowly treated in our society in the past 40 years that even the common dog gets more respect and sympathy than an adult human being! Those women would have been disheartened to hear about a dog that was mutilated by a man or a woman. But since the victim in the story was an adult male then the women just laughed about it. One even claimed it was "fabulous" what this man's wife did to him! WTF?! And I can remember the cheers for Lorena Bobbit back in 1993 after doing the same thing to her husband. Feminists even made her an icon! And what's even worse than all this is that many people in society just jump to the conclusion the "he must of deserved it" and even suggested that if he had cheated on his wife that he deserved to be mutilated! Again, WTF?! And what's even worse still is that the man never cheated but simply asked his wife for a divorce and these women said that THAT was grounds for him to be mutilated! Ditto the WTF?! Seriously, if female supremacy is all about discrimination and hate towards males then I seriously do hope that women will go back to the 1950s homemaker lifestyle and treat her man with some respect and dignity! Men have NEVER shown such low and disrespectful attitudes towards women and I believe have always sort of viewed women (secretively) as being superior to themselves, hence why men have done all the risky and dangerous work and served to protect and provide women for so long. If attitudes from women persist to treat men as dumb, ignorant, and worthless then I think women will be destroying any superiority they actually enjoyed at one time over men. Even studies have shown that women today are more miserable and unhappy than ever before in history - especially since 1970 and the feminism started encouraging man-hatred.

Still a man and still proud!Jul 20 2011 11:30pm

Sorry about all the typos. I'm using an iPhone and it's hard to press the onscreen letters and this damn thing does some sort of auto-correct that completely changes words around as I type. Auto-correct? Ha! More like auto-incorrect! Also, I don't see why women would want to adopt the masculine traits of wearing men's clothing and putting men in women's clothing if women ever did declare superiority over men? Wouldnt that defeat the purpose? Seems like some of you so-called men on here really just want to wear womens clothing and want other men like me to be forced into wearing such clothing so that you won't feel so out of place anymore. I think some of you are prime candidates for sexual reassignment surgery and really should consider that route if you're so adamant on wearing womens clothing. Don't encourage women to force men like me into wearing it! Speak and act for yourself! I have no interest in dressing like a woman and I'm completely happy being a straight white male! And my last note on the subject is this - if women do ever manage to become superior to men in society then I hope they will be responsible with such power and do all they can do to help men grow to their fullest potential as I believe men have done for women over the centuries. It's easy to get lost in the idea that men abused women or oppressed them but the truth is women were never cut out to do the work in the past. It took brawn and bravery to do what men had to do to protect and provide for their wives and children who were not physically cable of doing that work. Today, technology and machines have made most of the physical work men used to have to do obsolete and women are now able to grow from this point forward - as well as men. If it turns out that the future is better served with women actually using these machines and computers then so be it. But I believe there will always be males just as capable and in many cases as good or better than most women at using these tools. To bar them from participating in the growth of the future would be a travesty on humanity as a whole. There's a place for all of us in the future!

Still a man and still proud!Jul 20 2011 11:54pm

Well written. All good points Still a man and still proud!

AnonymousJul 22 2011 4:21pm

You people need to look at a *bell curve*. This notion that one gender is "vastly superior" and "much more intelligent" than another is absurd, and you back it up with anecdotes or pseudoscience. Does every woman in this thread think she is superior to Einstein? Feynman? Darwin? Are you superior to them simply because you're a woman, and therefore "smarter"? I've got news for you - intelligence is shown to be pretty evenly distributed. Interestingly, the bell curve shows that while women have a slightly higher average IQ, male supergeniuses outnumber female ones by a ratio of 3-1. Individuals are superior or inferior, not genders. This idea that every member of one gender can be superior to every member of another is ridiculous, and the idea that anyone would believe such a thing and have the nerve to call him or herself superior is absurd. The girl who can't manage to get your order right at Denny's is "superior" to the greatest scientific minds that the male gender has to offer? Give me a break.

TKSep 15 2011 10:32pm

I think it's even cuter when women talk about God as if it's a woman, as opposed to *an imaginary friend*. The fact that any of you think the Adam and Eve story is true based on absolutely zero evidence shows me just how "superior" you women really are. There are indeed intelligent, effective, competent women with much to offer society. Do you know where they are? They're working with their male counterparts among the intellectual elite, rather than claiming superiority to them based on some hormone, or their reproductive plumbing.

TKSep 15 2011 10:36pm

A GIRL, I would love to kneel before you and lick your feet - and then with your permission - I would gladly kiss your buttocks, lick your anus and worship your clit with my tounge. If you're interested or just want to chat online then please reply so we can arrange to communicate on a more private page. P.S (I'm not interested in female dominance politics or any politics for that matter, I just love licking out young women and making them orgasm in my mouth.

I love to lick Female Anus.Sep 15 2011 11:05pm

When I was growing up, I was always impressed by how much faster the girls grew up and reached maturity long before we boys did. When I was in college, most of the girsl I dated were still in high school, usually two to five years younger than I. Yet, in most cases these girls were actually more mature than I was. I am interested in people's opinions as to how by how many years teen-age girls are ahead of boys the same age.

JAKMay 04 2012 10:21am

Both genders should be taught that Females are far superior from the very beginning. Being a Woman myself I think society should stop lying and being politically correct and acknowledge the fact that us girls are superior. I don't believe girls should make fun or ridicule boys. Instead girls should be taught to understand that we're superior and to treat everyone with respect. Being male doesn't mean being useless. It means understanding your place and respecting women who are superior.

BeckaMay 17 2012 9:58am

Both genders should be taught that Males are far superior from the very beginning. Being a Man myself I think society should stop lying and being politically correct and acknowledge the fact that us guys are superior. I don't believe boys should make fun or ridicule girls. Instead boys should be taught to understand that we're superior and to treat everyone with respect. Being female doesn't mean being useless. It means understanding your place and respecting men who are superior. I hope now that I've reversed Becka's comment we can all see how sexist it is. :)

JoeJun 06 2012 6:06pm

Biologically I think women have it tougher. They deal with a lot of painful poo, including leaking every month. But historically I'm sorry to say men have put up with a lot more. Men are just seen as less valuable than women in society. You can point to every example of male on female sexism you want, but you only have to glance at the records of war-dead, or the list of people lost aboard the Titanic to see which gender we really favour. Men are expected to sacrifice themselves to help women. Whereas a woman is useful to society just for being a fertile woman, a man must prove his worth by being useful to women and society. Whether it be hunting, fighting, or offering to pay for dinner, men are expected to put themselves dead last. And we accept this fate happily, because it makes us proud to appear strong. All we ask is that the women we provide for respect us. It's this pride in manliness that makes the high-powered workplace a male-oriented space. This male orientation provides an atmosphere conducive to a positive male self-image. When women demand entrance to the high-powered workplace, they take away all male purpose and male pride. The worst of them expect to be provided for by their men, as well as to be considered equal to or better than them at work. This will not do. If humans want a truly equal society then we have to dismantle the current order bit by bit, and unfortunate biological differences will hinder this. We need to redefine what it is to be a good "man" and a good "woman". Or, radically enough, a good "person".

Joe againJun 06 2012 6:21pm

It's interesting to observe the angry males who are threatened by the thought of females being superior. I am in my 60's and have realized from my early youth that girls were more intelligent than boys. I observed the panic than males felt when females began demanding equal rights. Fear welled up in many males as the idea that someday women could possibly take over. I also felt that fear, but no longer. Today, I yearn for the day that women take over every echelon of society. I yearn for the day that women are automatically considered the heads of their families. I would like to see our nation lead the way towards a day when women rule over men in their families and politically and economically. I would love to see the day when young girls grow up knowing that they will be the one's to continue on to college while young boys know that their education will for the most part prepare them for thier homemaking roll...I think they used to call it 'Home Economics'. I recently observed that nearly 99.5% of women are wearing pants. Women have truly made pants thier garment of choice. I would love to see women start demanding that their men wear skirts, dresses, and many of the other garments that have long been considered feminine. As men loose thier grip of money and power, they need to become attractive to women in other ways. I'm not talking about some utilikilt, I'm talking about skirts, blouses, dresses, and undergarments that are pretty and feminine. I think 'feminine' should become the new masculine as a demonstration of males inferiority and submission to women.

leeJun 11 2012 8:19am

I did some research and have learned that boys in elemenatary and middle schools have a deep down and thorough acceptance of female superiority. this is exciting and fascinating to me. How were boys socialized to acquiesce to their own subordination? Was it the fruits of feminisim paying off after 50 years ?Socialization by all female elementary school teachers? My friend teachers forth grade. 11 out of 12 boys said that they wished they had been born a girl. Reciprocally only one girl out of 10 or 11 wished they were born as a boy. They also said if there was a painless process to be transformed into a girl they would do it. So the notion of female superiority is ingrained in the minds in my part of Florida. The girls self- esteem is very high in her class. The boys feel submissive and subordinant due to socialization of them to the belief of the superiority of girls

LoriDec 30 2012 8:54am

Women... you have betrayed your Men. He has given his life to you and in return your have given him ridicule, scorn, shame and all manner of dehumanization. Do not believe this is without consequence. Unfortunately for your species you are not a homogenous race. The decline of boys is purely a Western Phenomena. The so-called 3rd world nations and developing nations have a very aggressively masculine outlook. In the past those societies which became too enveloped in effeminate traits such as: submissiveness, complicity, shyness and became docile and victims to the whims of women; all these societies eventually were overrun, destroyed, or conquered by a superior masculine society. The Empires of old were aggressively masculine. They were conquerors, explorers, colonizers and administrators which are the most powerful traits of Men. They conquered and advanced much weaker and effeminate societies. But then these same Empires became effeminate and collapsed. The once conquered found their masculinity. The women came to realize that a castrated man is a dead man. Dead men do not produce offspring fit for survival. Kill the man and you kill the woman. Likewise you kill the woman and you kill the man. This is why often campaigns are launched not against the warrior-men, be they soldiers, savages, guerrillas, revolutionaries or tribesmen; but rather, against their women! Conquer the other's woman and the Man will fall. In modern times it is the woman that is destroying her own civilization by attacking and destroying that which gives the society it's vitality and innovation and drive to evolve and survive. A world of pure women-traits is a lethargic one that does not adapt. Women sneer and laugh with glee that they outperform their men in an institution that has consistently been failing to educate them over the decades by lowered standards and sub-par performance. This is not something to boast about. Educational standards are at a historical low. Should men turn around and sneer back at women that this degradation in education is because women were let in and contaminated the standards? Perhaps if men should be as immature and inexperienced in the art of survival as women. There has never been a revolution that has been initiated by women as a group. Men are always the first to spot injustice and tyranny. Women have been historically more than content to cope and even aid tyrannical and oppressive systems so long as these cater to their status-quo conservative and lethargically nature. A woman's society does not innovate, they do not advance, they don't seek to discover nor to even secure their own resources (they get the men to do it). A woman-centered society is prone to die. Not because women are inferior, but because for millenia women selected only the BEST males to breed. They selected the strongest, most clever and innovative of men because such a mate ensured her own survival, specifically the survival of her own offspring as the man was also inclined to see to the survival of his own offspring and of his mate. Through this natural selection Human Beings bred themselves into what they are today. You cannot undo this within a thousand years of selective breeding anymore than you can breed the wolf out of the common dog. There was of course a trade off. Men and women are sexually dimorphic. Men have larger bodies, are built far more robust, have a larger brain, greater metabolism, greater resistance to diseases and a hard wired instinct to be cunning, clever, ingenious, crafty, thrifty, and innovative in order to survive. Women on the other hand are physically smaller, more slender, aesthetically more pleasing, fairer hair and skin, her instincts are more nurturing and more inclined to be caring and loving, she is often seen as innocent and defenseless although many times she is clearly neither (especially in today's society). Both genders complement each other. Wise women know how to preserve their men for both of their sakes. Foolish women attack and dehumanize their men to the peril of them both.

A non-human observerJan 17 2013 10:24pm

A woman says to her son, "Do you know that half of you came from an inferior being?" So he looks at his dad. University educated, 6'4, ripped with muscle. Then he looks at his mom. 5'0, rake thin, thick as a brick. Then he says to her mom, "Yeah, Mom. You!"

and what?Apr 24 2013 4:42pm

@and what? You seem to equate physical superiority with the most important superiority -- the defining superiority. Yes, the average man is physically superior to the average woman, but is that the most important kind of superiority in today's world. I think educational superiority is more important and there the women have it over the men. Moreover, women are biologically superior -- they live longer. And also women are morally superior. The prisons are filled with men, not women.

AmandaApr 25 2013 8:24am

@Lori. Can you give some web links pertaining to your research. I too find it fascinating that most boys in elementary and middle school feel inferior to girls, whereas girls feel superior to boys. With feelings of inferiority come feelings of submissiveness and acceptance of ways of subordination. Imagine a generation of such socialization. The implications for the future are fascinating.

AmandaApr 25 2013 8:33am

Amanda,http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-11151143 and I will post a few more. I think it is great !!I think it is due to the spectacular success of feminism as well as the feminized school curriculum.

LoriMay 13 2013 11:02am

@Lori. Girls and Women are leaving boys and men in the dust educationally. In the U.S., we are now the more educated sex and our superiority there will increase. It is clear that in a decade or so we will dominate the professions -- lawyers, doctors, judges, etc., and the occupations requiring a colledge education, including the supervisory positions. However, women will not be viewed as the superior sex as long as men occupy the highest positions in business and government. More women must run for elected offices, especially state and federal. When women comprise a majority of state legislators, governors, both houses of congress, and the presidency, everyone will acknowledge that women are the superior sex. Males feeling submissive and subordinant will help because they will feel it natural for women to be the leaders. But women have to want and seek leadership.

AmandaMay 15 2013 11:50am

Over the past few decades, the advances in technology have allowed us to take a closer look at what is happening within both the female and male brain. Male brains are larger than female brains, yet females can think and calculate faster than men can. Magnetic resonance imaging and other brain imaging techniques have shown that most female brains are more active than most male brains. Even when the female brain is resting it has been shown to be as active as an activated male brain. Considering such information, it appears that many girls will have an intelligence advantage over boys by being consistently engaged, even when they arenâ€™t trying as hard as a boy. As a further result of MRI scans we are able to see and view the ways in which some boys and girls process information. Generally speaking, the female brain processes more responding stimulants, through more senses, and more completely than the male brain. When information content comes into the female brain it travels in through the limbic system up to the top four lobes of the brain where thinking occurs. On the other hand, many males seem to move this content through the limbic system down to the brain stem. Basically, this means that females are more likely to process the information faster and reach a conclusion, as more of the activity moves into the hemispheres that handle thinking. Comparatively, men take longer to process information than women because their brains have less neurons available for activity and the connections between those neurons are fewer in number than those found in womenâ€™s brains. It is hypothesized that because of this, women constantly operate on a superior level of awareness than men, as their brains are always taking in more sensory information. Because of the limited processing in male brains, they are more likely to need a rest period than in females. The study proved that many male brains frequently enter a reboot phase as they become overloaded easier than female brains, which arenâ€™t as limited in terms of calculation. This phenomenon is similar to the fact that a computer with less RAM and a slower processing speed is more likely to lock up than one which is more powerful. In addition to processing speed and greater sensory intake, females also have a larger corpus callosum, which connects both brain hemispheres. Because the female brain can use both sides more efficiently and more effectively than the male brain, it is able to carry more information throughout more connections, increasing its speed and giving the female greater resources for thought. The differences between intelligence between the genders can be explained through biology. At conception, all life begins as female, marked by the XX chromosome. To roughly half of these embryos, a Y chromosome is introduced, turning the original female embryo into a male. Testosterone surges throughout the growth of the baby while in the womb at a much higher rate than in the female. This chemical transforms the original female brain, enlarging the sex and aggression centers. Testosterone also has been shown to kill off brain cells and damage connections within the brain, as while as put the male at a much higher risk for diseases and brain related disorders. To compensate for this, nature has made 105 males be conceived to every 100 females. Because males are more likely not to survive birth or to die at a younger age, their higher numbers shrink quickly, as females become roughly 52% of the population. These biological differences not only explain the limited cognitive abilities of the male brain in relation to the female, but also explain why females outlive males in humans as well as in the all animal kingdoms. These advantages of the female brain go even beyond intelligence. There are many different chemicals in the brain that affect the ways in which we act, feel, and respond in different situations. The feelings experienced as a result of these chemicals are caused by receptors in the brain which produce the effect of the chemical when activated. Because girls have more brain activity and more neurons in their brains than boys, they also have more receptors. A perfect example of a chemical reaction in the brain is orgasm. We feel orgasms as pleasurable because of the chemicals serotonin and oxytocin are released in our brain during climax. Because receptors are greater in number in the female brain then in men, orgasm will feel much better for a girl than it does for a boy. Brain scans show that during orgasm the female brain experiences 10 times the amount of pleasurable chemicals than in the male brain. In addition, the chemicals stick around in womenâ€™s brains longer than in the male brain, so the pleasurable experience lasts longer. Girls are also capable of multiple orgasms, so their brain remains ready to experience the pleasure over and over again for as long as she desires. Because of the refractory period men experience after they have an orgasm, they remain unable to have another orgasm for a period of time. This results in girls being capable of more powerful and longer lasting orgasms then in men, where orgasms are shorter, weaker, and fewer in number. In scientific studies, the equivalent of the male orgasm was played through the brains of volunteering women. Their experiences were recorded in written testimonies. Common remarks was that the intensity of the male orgasm was much weaker than what they normally experienced from orgasm and that the orgasm ended much quicker than they anticipated. When these women had female orgasms in the lab, they were much more vocal and their bodies contorted as their muscles contracted in response to the orgasm. When the same women experienced the male-style orgasm, they remained mostly quiet and stood almost completely still. They were actually quieter and moved less during the male orgasm then men who had their orgasms studied in the lab. Scientists hypothesized this was due to the females being used to experiencing a more powerful orgasm than the male-style orgasm that they experienced in the lab, while men experiencing the orgasm saw it as normal and had never felt anything better. Scientists were unable to allow the male volunteers of the study to experience the female orgasm, as the male brain is unable to handle the abundance of chemicals and activity the female orgasm provides. There was a theory that if the intensity of a girlâ€™s orgasm was played through a boyâ€™s brain, the shock to his system would kill him. Because of this, it appears the female orgasm remains a treat which can only be enjoyed by women. "I definitely feel very blessed that I was born female" study coordinator Sheryl Task joked. "If I was a man, I'd definitely be really jealous."

scientific articleMay 24 2013 4:39pm

In the 1950's an anthropologist named Ashley Montague published a book called "The Natural Superiority of Women." He updated it several times, the last time in the 1990s. Research since has confirmed and added to what he said. However, women will always be the "Second Sex" until women occupy the majority of the highest positions in government, the professions, and business.

AmandaMay 27 2013 8:40am

@Amanda. With over 60 years passing since the publication of "The Natural Superiority of Women" and with all the scientific evidence to support it I find it very disappointing fellow members of my male gender are still in denial about the obvious superiority of females. I think most are simply in denial. Just because it's not what they want to hear doesn't mean it's not true. When I first read the book I too was in shock and had a bit of denial myself. It simply didn't seem plausible that one gender could have so many advantages over the other yet still be of the same species. I decided to do my own research and found out not only are the book's claims correct, but that there is a lot more evidence of female superiority that wasn't even mentioned. Initially humiliation and shame set in which is still feel occasionally, but I've come to accept female superiority as the fact that it is. Gender is chosen at random, and those of us born male simply weren't as lucky as those born female. Basically Amanda, consider yourself lucky you're a girl.

BillMay 28 2013 8:39pm

I truly hope the current pattern of female dominance continues in society because woman and men will benefit from a more balanced society. Today society tilts toward the masculine but it is easy to see that as females gain more power the balance will soon be equal and if women continue to advance they will achieve (and soon I hope) actual dominance over society. A matriarchal society will serve society better. Females won't treat their males in violent ways the way males do now. Nor will they subjugate men. Males will make the adjustment to female domination in the same way women have adjusted to male domination in the past. It is probable males will become more submissive and perhaps their attire and attitude will shift toward the feminine. If this shift occurs it will happen slowly and to future women and men it will seem normal for the male to be passive while the female enjoys her position of authority. Unfortunately I sometimes think women are reluctant to push for dominance while males seem more ready for the change to take place. What do you women think?

Jade KimMay 29 2013 12:09am

@Bill. I don't think boys and men should feel humiliation and shame because they are members of the inferior sex. As you say, they didn't make themselves males, it's a matter of luck. I think boys and men today feel that way and are in denial about the evidence of female superiority because we are in a transitioning phase from patriarchy to matriarchy. Boys and men are still being raised with patriarchal ideals and values. They are raised to think that they are members of the superior sex. It is the job of the schools to correct that. As Jade Kim says, it will take time but eventually boys and men will accept female superiority.

AmandaMay 30 2013 6:01am

@Jade Kim. I agree with everything you wrote! Especially, "a matriarchal society will serve society better." Given that, it is a moral imperative that every woman and man should support that women occupy the majority of the highest positions in government, the professions, and business. Also, women should be the head of the household in the great majority of families. Families are the beginning and base of society. Children get their fundamental ideas about the relative authority of women and men from wife and husband relations. Children should grow up seeing "Mother knows best" not "Father knows best."

AmandaMay 30 2013 6:04am

@Amanda. I too agree a time in which everyone accepts the fact of female superiority and the matriarchy that comes with it isn't far away. However, I see humiliation and shame as common feelings males should experience when confronted with the fact of female superiority. There is great shame that comes with the realization the other sex is smarter, will live longer, and is overall better than you. This adds to the great sexual power women already have over me and all men in general. My guess is your inability to understand why males feel this shame comes with the fact that as a female you're superior to men. You simply have never had to deal with facing the fact your gender is inferior to the other because as a female it wouldn't be true. I believe that for boys, the way to get over most of the humiliation and shame and turn it into acceptance and servitude is education. You're right, it's the schools job. Female superiority should be taught as a class throughout school in order to better prep men for the matriarchy they will face when they leave school. This way, males will already learn the science of how females will live longer than them, how the female brain is smarter/quicker, how all embryos start out female in the womb, amongst all the other facts of female superiority.

BillMay 30 2013 9:45am

@Bill. I am sorry that you feel humiliation and shame for realizing that you are a member of the inferior sex. I think that most women would want their brothers, boyfriends, husbands, and sons to feel comfortable with themselves, with who they are (males), and not go around feeling ashamed of being male. You cannot be happy feeling ashamed of who you are, especially when you can do nothing about it, and women want they brothers, boyfriends, husbands and sons to be happy. That's the way women are. I believe that women are superior to men but not that every female is superior to every male. That would be a crazy idea! In school, most girls outperform the boys, but at the same time, some top students are boys. 75% of high school valedictorians are girls, but that means 25% are boys. Most criminals are overwhelmingly men, but a few women commit terrible crimes. I hope for a matriarchy where women comprise a majority of the government, professional, and business leaders, and where women are a majority of the heads of marriages and everyone considers that normal. I think that is feasible, but not that all power holders should be women. There are some smart, industrious, mature, and well-behaved men. These men can contribute significantly to society, and they should be enabled to do so, for the benefit of all. As Jade Kim said, women will not suppress men. The truly superior do not need to suppress the inferior, that is, hold them down. Given an even playing field, women will outperform men. We do not need to hold men down. Given an even playing field, our innate superiority will raise us above men and there will be a matriarchy.

AmandaMay 31 2013 12:05pm

@Amanda. We seem to have different viewpoints on how the Matriarchy should playout. Although I feel shame at being male, I am otherwise very comfortable with who I am. I'm actually glad I'm male as I get to be in awe of women and their superiority to me. I think males who feel shame in being inferior to women also have a greater respect for the female gender as a whole. I would hope in the future women would want men to have this trait as they would be more submissive and easier to train. Secretly, most men desire to submit to women and I see this secret desire being more public in the future. Add this to the fact science has proven females superior to males in a variety of ways and women will put 2 and 2 together and realize their gender should be in charge and enslave men. This will benefit men as they desire to serve women, and it will benefit women as it will make their lives easier. Women are smarter then men so it won't be to hard for most women to control a male slave, and men's strong sexual attraction towards women will be used as a rewards system by women aiming to train their slaves. Males will be locked in chastity and now allowed a release unless they please their female owners. Males will be in a constant state of sexual frustration that will make them constantly obedient. Society will be better off this way where women are in firm control of males as all the crime, wars, rapes, and other problems men cause will be history.

BillMay 31 2013 3:08pm

Wow! Amanda your comments are right on. We women give birth to both females and males and as you say we want the best for both. It seems to me that under a matriarchal society the whole community would benefit because females care for people first. They are much more empathetic. Males inside the home would see the benefit and not be shameful of themselves but rather work to support and help their spouse achieve grater success....which in the end would benefit both. If i were in that situation i would praise the male six times a day!!!!!!!!! Another topic i am interested is how marriage would change when the majority of females become the main breadwinners and control the economics of the home. Amanda, I would like your thoughts about this and others, as well...Jade

JadeMay 31 2013 5:19pm

@Bill. I think that the kind of personal relationship you want with a woman puts you in a minority among men and even fewer women would want that kind of relationship. And I think that your idea of matriarchy would better be termed a "female supremacy." On the distinction between the two I invite you to check out the following blogs by a woman who calls herself "lucy83": http://lucy83.hubpages.com/hub/Female-Supremacy and http://lucy83.hubpages.com/hub/Matriarchy. Both blogs (or hubs) include quite a number of comments by readers. Her main page contains numerous related hubs. In my opinion, lucy83 is a no nonsense, level headed woman with a lot of common sense.

AmandaJun 02 2013 3:16pm

@Amanda. I'm kind of puzzled how anyone could want a Matriarchy without believing women are superior to men. For generations males have been the dominant gender based on the myth of male superiority. I question if you don't believe women are the superior gender, why do you want a matriarchy? How can you ignore the handful of scientific evidence pointing towards female superiority? The comment above yours is actually a perfect example that gives solid evidence of female superiority. Also, I disagree men/women who share my beliefs are the minority (look how many there are on this site alone). Most men simply hide their submissive desires towards women, and because our society isn't ready for female rule yet women aren't as open about their desire to rule over men. Anyone who takes a look around can notice women control men now but in more subtle ways. It's not uncommon for a wife to force her husband to do work around the house for her, or to get him to obey her. This is women's desire for men to serve them playing out in a more subtle way. In the future as society progresses and female superiority becomes more public, so will both men's desire to serve and women's desire to be served. Males are naturally submissive toward women because males need to please females in order to mate. Because mating is no challenge for females, they require males to please them in order to allow them access to mate. This is why most men are willing to jump through hoops in order to please their women, but not the other way around. A society in which men are willingly slaves controlled by their women serves as a more accurate representation of the relationship between the two genders.

BillJun 02 2013 3:41pm

@Jade. On the issue how marriage and female-and-male relations will change in the future feminine world, I invite you to check out the hub I recommended above to Bill: http://lucy83.hubpages.com/hub/Matriarchy. For me, a significant, fundamental change that needs to be made is that of the wife taking the husband's last name. This custom makes the man in a marriage the more significant partner and the wife a kind of appurtenance. It confirms his role as head and hers as follower. Her identity is not really hers in her own right but derives from her husband's status. As a minimum, the wife should keep her last name and her children should have her last name. That would preserve the woman's identity in her own right and let the children know who's the more important parent in the family (and, on a practical note, it would simplify things after a divorce.) A matriarchal society is a woman-centric society and the fundamental customs should support that. Social pressure should be put on the men to take their wife's last name. If that were done, men would then view themselves as the appurtenance in the marriage (woman as center and he as add-on). Imagine a few generations of women keeping their last names in marriage and men changing their last names to that of their wives!

AmandaJun 02 2013 3:54pm

@Bill i agree we males need to be under firm control of women. the male gender was created to be slaves to the female and they are superior to us in everyway. to amanda and jade i think u have the right idea but u need to be more strict or else female rule will never happen. male slaves need to be under firm control of women with no chance of freedom or they will cause problems. every girl/woman should have a least 1 male slave who obeys her without question. women can trade slaves or buy more at a slave auction.

girls rule boys droolJun 03 2013 9:35am

@girls rule boys drool. Thanks, it's good to see a fellow male who recognizes his inferiority. Because science has proven females undeniably superior to males and because most males have strong submissive desires towards women, it makes sense that our gender should be enslaved. I agree every woman is entitled to at least one male slave devoted to serving her as it would make their lives easier. In regards to your comments to Amanda and Jade I would like to remind you that as females they are superior to us, and you should always treat them with respect and obedience. Although we cannot completely understand their views, it's probably because as women they're smarter than us. Even though we may disagree with them I wouldn't hesitate to obey Amanda immediately without question if she requested anything of me because as a man, I can be easily under her complete control and I acknowledge her as my superior. Assuming they are both women, it is our rightful place as men to devote our lives to serving them and obeying their every command.

BillJun 03 2013 2:32pm

@bill i agree and my comments werent not meant to be disrespectful to either of them. i was trying to show them that they need to be more strict with males in order for them to gain control and make their lives easier. but as a man its not my place to make recommendations to superiors(women). amanda or jade if either of u were offended i am sorry as it is not my place to even speak unless you allow me to. im sure you understand as i only have a dumb boy brain. amanda or jade if this can be taken as a apology just know as girls i know u are superior to me and my rightful place is at your feet awaiting orders. i will go 5 days without cumming in order to punish myself just in case i was out of line unless either of u girls think my punishment should be stricter and need more time.

girls rule boys droolJun 04 2013 4:13pm

@Amanda: The male taking the women's last name is brilliant. Over the years I have have often thought."Why does the woman have to take the man's name and where did that come from?" To reverse this custom has a huge symbolic, if not actual, affect on the psychic of both women and men.You are correct that he would then feel like the appendage to the woman. This is where men belongs anyway. Off to the side LoL!! I am wondering once we gain economic superiority and looking to be with someone... is marriage the right alternative for us now? If I own a house and make more money why should I risk that on some guy? What do you think?....Jade

JadeJun 04 2013 4:42pm

@Jade: There are several variables concerning your question -- "future vs present" and "in general vs individual situation." In the future, women will hold more power than men. The majority of federal and legislators will be women and will enact marriage laws that are more woman-centric. The majority of lawyers will be women and the majority of judges will be women. So, you can see where all that leads to. But what about the present? The biggest variable is the state one lives in. Marriage laws vary from state to state. And then there is the court's interpretation and application of those laws. I'm not lawyer, so I cannot speak knowingly, but I understand the courts favor women in settlements. I think you would ant to research the laws and the court's application in you own state. Further, there is the possibility of a pre-nuptial agreement that a lawyer (chosen and vetted by you) would draw up for you and your husband-to-be to sign. For example, if you own a home, the pre-nup could include your husband-to-be's agreement that he would have no claim on it in case of divorce or rights to any disposition of it (e.g., selling it would be your unilateral right). An obvious alternative to marriage is co-habitation. I'm not up on the statistics but I think the percentage of couples co-habitating has grown enormously (possibly rivaling the rate of marriages). Even then, I think a woman would be wise to have a lawyer draw up some agreement. Maybe an inventory of what goods each brings to the relationship (e.g., furniture, appliances, etc). I think such an agreement should specify that children born of the relationship would have the mother's maiden name. Co-habitation may be for life but I think when a couple thinks about maintaining the relationship for life then they think marriage. Aside from the social and legal advantages, marriage signifies commitment, which is psychological satisfying and I think brings even more commitment. I think that there are so many variables in a specific couple's relationship that each person has to evaluate them for herself. Before considering marriage, I would think that if a woman and man co-habitated and she were the better educated, and earned more money, then she and her partner would have agreed on her being the head and he the follower and lived accordingly to her satisfaction. We all know marriage brings risks, but both women and men value it highly, and there's something to said for that. Caveat -- I am neither lawyer nor counselor, but you asked for my thoughts.

AmandaJun 05 2013 1:03pm

@Amanda: Great ideas. Women should always take the proper steps the ensure her property stays her property even after the marriage. Men simply don't have that luxury, even today. On the other hand, how funny are these men who openly admit they'll do anything we say!? Really goes to show how easy it will be in the future for women to gain power. Part of me thinks we should hand out a punishment for them simply for questioning us, as the morons will no doubt obey it! What do you think?...Jade

JadeJun 06 2013 8:51am

@Jade. Depends. Lots of variables again, so its hard to generalize. What punishment do you have in mind? I think many (most?) guys that say they'll do anything we say are living out a sexual fantasy. They want to be submissive in sex but in the everyday world they still want to be control. The sexual state of an individual man is also a factor. There's a saying, "When a man is soft, he's hard, but when he's hard, he's soft."

AmandaJun 06 2013 9:41am

@Amanda: That quote makes a lot of sense! Although their submissive desires are related to sexual arousal I think if women constantly keep their men in a state of sexual frustration they will be under our control at all times. Some men wear chastity devices 24/7 with their wife/girlfriend holding the key, I think this is a prime example of their submissive desires being more than just a fantasy. We are the superior gender and them obeying the punishments we hand out is a perfect example of that. If more women would do this men would become more conditioned to women in charge, and our positions in society would become one of leadership. My recommendation is we give them a length of time in which they cannot orgasm. I'll let you choose the amount of time, as you were the one they disagreed with. We all know it is not a man's place to disagree with a woman.

JadeJun 06 2013 12:17pm

@Jade. I didn't realize at first that when you were talking about punishing some men, you were talking about Bill and "girls rule boys drool" because they disagreed with me. To be honest with you, that is a game I do not like to play. When Bill and "girls rule boys drool" got all submissive and groveling, I ignored them. Their groveling is not true submission to ME done to benefit Me but something done to benefit themselves. To tell them not to orgasm for x number of days would not be true punishment. It would be giving them what they really want, as in Brer Rabbit saying "Whatever you do, don't throw me in the briar patch." True discipline is done to discourage certain behavior but playing their game encourages their behavior. It does nothing for me and I'm not interested in doing anything for them. To ignore them would be true punishment. Also, their submission is indescriminate. They are not submitting to ME, but to some idealization in their minds. In real life, they would go around groveling before ANY woman if they got the chance. I might accept a man submitting to ME, but I wouldn't want him to drop to his knees before every Tomisina, Rachael, and Harriet who passes by. I don't think that there is anything wrong with men or women playing the game. It's just not for me. On the subject of keeping men in a state of sexual frustration, have you heard of "karezza"? If not, please check this out: http://abcnews.go.com/Health/karezza-lovemaking-orgasm-strengthens-marriages-advocates/story?id=16743124#.UbELBPkqCSo

AmandaJun 06 2013 3:28pm

Amanda: The last 2 remarks after your response with "there are several variables" came from someone using my name. Who ever it is stop it. I am trying discuss some things with Amanda that are important to me and I don't want someone else pretending to me!! What a creep!

JadeJun 06 2013 4:38pm

@Jade. I've been very busy and haven't checked this poll since Thursday. The first remark you mentioned puzzled me; I thought I must be missing something. The second surprised me; it seemed out of character with your previous posts. I should have suspected something but I guess I'm naive. It never occurred to me that someone would pretend to be another poster on this poll. I suspect it was "girls rule boys droll." He seems to have such a need there. I'm very busy now on a project and probably wont be checking in again on likelike poll for a week or so.

AmandaJun 08 2013 7:00am

Amanda and Jade, you need a reality check badly. You don't want to lose your stuff after a divorce? How do you feel when that happens to men all the time? Men built the computer you use, the internet you used to send those nonsense comments, the house you live in, the car you drive and pretty much everything else you use and take for granted. Men maintain them as well. I suggest you two get out into the real world and get a little more educated. Spoiled brats lol.

Get realJun 11 2013 9:04pm

Well I suppose you are right men suffer in divorce too. The difference I suppose is that in today's world women in marriage are in second position and so it can affect them more. They are often left with the children and trying to work at the same time. My comments to Amanda was trying to speculate on a different kind of arrangement. Something other than marriage. I am thinking out loud and wondering if the man took the women's last name and she led the relationship to what extent things would be more balanced between the woman and the man? By the way the the question "Is female superiority being imprinted on the younger generation?" I would say "yes, to a degree." but again I think this is good because right now the balance between the sexes is too in favor of the masculine. A more balanced society between genders would be a better place. It just seems logical to me!!

JadeJun 12 2013 4:40pm

Virtually every study thats ever been done shows men suffer more after divorce than women do, and by a great margin. Most of this is because divorce courts are sexist towards men. Women are awarded more after a divorce than men. Most men would love to have their kids, but most courts give them to the mother even if their father is better fit to raise them. Most men also have to pay high alimony and/or child support after the divorce, sometimes the payments are so high the man cant support himself as the courts force him to support a wife and child he isnt even allowed to see. Some women report the money they receive from their exhusband is so high they dont have to work as they can live comfortably. I hope now you understand why men face more hardships than women in that area. Simply working and taking care of the kids would be a walk in the park compared to the difficulties men face in life. In addition, I suggest you take a look at previous comments on this poll. The question "is the notuon of female superiority being imprinted on the younger generation" wasnt meant to be taken seriously. It was posted by a man who has a female domination fetish to hear responses from others who have the same interests. Theres many other poll like this from this same timeframe on the site. They're just men looking to read material to get off too.

get realJun 13 2013 8:02am

@get real. Get real yourself. Women no longer depend on men. Few occupations require brawn. For those that do, machines marginalize male brawn. Women are becoming more and more economically independent. Most high school graduates, most high school honor students, and 75% of high school valedictorians are girls. Women comprise about 60% of all college graduates and are earning more master's and doctorates than men. Eventually they will have 60% of all the high paying jobs and be most of the supervisors and managers. They are currently taking over more and more of the best paying jobs (accounting, financial management, banking, etc.). Young women today do not want to be dependent on a man. They want economic independence and they are achieving it. The average wife will be better educated than and will out earn her husband. She will be the head of the house and he her dependent. The Supreme Court has ruled that women have unilateral reproductive rights, which gives the women decisive superior rights there that men will never equal.. Because of their superior education and jobs, eventually women will comprise the majority of the best political candidates. They outnumber and outvote men. Anytime they want, they can create a government of mostly women. Ask yourself this question: If women can be 60% of all highly educated people, why can't they achieve 60% of all social, business, and political power?

What's happeningJun 24 2013 3:28pm

"what's happening" Women still earn less then men and chose lower paying jobs. Men are still the head of most households. You can pretend things are changing, but they will not turn into what you're predicting. Look at how women are treated in the third world countries.

Are you dumb?Jun 24 2013 8:39pm

"Women STILL earn less . . ."-- changing. "Women STILL . . . choose lower paying jobs.-- changing. "Men are STILL the head of most households."-- changing. Re how women are treated in third world countries, you're right but I'm in the U.S. and talking only about changes in the U.S. If you want stats, check out comments by "A. I. G." on the poll "Are men intimidated by the prospect of female supremacy?" Check the sources cited, especially the Pew and Forbes polls.

What's happeningJun 25 2013 7:31am

It's changing BECAUSE women now have an equal opportunity. This does not mean men will be replaced and become second class. Society progresses into enlightenment, not discrimination. It's clear you want a female-lead society from the beginning so you cherry pick facts to use when you paint this picture of a future female-lead world. You also don't seem to realize current trends in society change. In the future men may make most of the voters. No offense, but I suggest you take a critical thinking class to learn how to obtain facts without drawing biased conclusions.

Are you dumb?Jun 25 2013 10:50am

Whenever someone attacks the person, that is a good indication that he or she is insecure about his or her ground (Logic 101 -- species of "ad hominem" redirection of the issue). Let's try to stick to the issue of the gender changes that have been and are going on and surely will go on from a while longer. I wrote initially to express the idea that there are real issues here--that no all comments are jerk-off material, although there is plenty of that. Since you have retorted with some serious minded comments, I think you tacitly have agreed to that. Now: when did I say men will be replaced? Did I imply that? I don't think so. When did I say men may become second class? Did I imply that they might? Not really, because there is a difference between being "second class" and "the second sex." Did I imply that men "might" become the second sex? Yes, meaning thereby that they would be second in education, prestigious jobs, earnings, and overall power. Notice though I say "might" not "will". You say "It's clear you want a female-lead society from the beginning." Clear to you perhaps, but wrong. You say I "cherry pick facts" to paint a picture of a future female-lead world. No. No cherry picking. I accept A. I. G.'s facts as good facts with respectable citations as to sources. I see no reason to copy and post them here. If you have counter-facts, by all means let's hear them (and please cite sources). Re current trends in society changing: yes they do, but at any given time you have to project the trends you know in the present. If you are aware of significant counter-trends, let's hear them. What I want is an answer to my question: "If women can be 60% of all highly educated people (and all that that implies), why can't they achieve 60% of all social, business, and political power?" (And let's not forget women can outvote men). And your answer is? Women will never achieve more social, business, and political power than men because . . . (?)

What's happeningJun 25 2013 4:13pm

^moron

AnonymousJun 27 2013 8:21am

Add a comment:

Vote | Results | Home
Vote Results