|
Comments
YEA WOMEN!!!!
We belong at the feet of women and serve them and lick their feet. We need to be kicked and punished by women for their pleasure. maleMay 02 2003 9:39am yes Women have all the right to keep us men under their feet as door mats maleMay 02 2003 9:40am Women are superior to men in every way. a womanMay 14 2003 5:50am i think men are treated like the superior sex by society because they are genrally the people who make the most money in a family but look what woman do in the home as well as sometimes haveing a full or parttime job the dodgyy kid down the roadMay 29 2003 6:41am i bet that "male" iz a woman! just a guess tho. there'z nuthing wrong with being one tho. az they say, "man made man, but u alwayz need a rough copy before the final one!" AnonymousJun 29 2003 8:54pm men were created by women maleJul 25 2003 12:14pm WOMEN RULE YAH!!!!!! none of ur buisnessSep 25 2003 11:48am Who can argue? My wife has a higher education, she earns more, she has a career (unlike me), she makes the financial decisions, and usually turns out to be right when we disagree. I'm not surprised to see more and more women excelling in university, increasining in social and political influence, and taking leadership. I think men will have to just relax and accept the rise and rule of women. RichardSep 28 2003 1:58pm I agree that women are far superior, in every sense. They're smarter, better at communicating, they're got far superior endurance, they can take more pain, they live longer, they're tougher than us, and some of them are even getting physically stronger than us. KenOct 09 2003 2:01pm There can be little doubt left on the matter. Women are smarter, more insightful, better debaters and think faster. They comprise a majority now in higher education and are claiming more and more positions of authority and power. IvanhoeNov 12 2003 10:34pm You don't have to be a feminist to accept the fact that the female of our species is superior to the male. CHANNov 28 2003 10:25pm Men are still good for taking out the trash. JenDec 30 2003 3:20am A man can be trained to do anything a woman wants him to do. She just needs to get into his head and find out what makes him tick. MariahDec 31 2003 11:48pm Well,around our house,my wife wears the pants! And they're leather ones too. She makes most of the money and makes me give what little I make to her. I do most of the chores and keep my mouth shut. She also makes all the decisions and I either agree with her or kiss her butt--FOR REAL--NO JOKE. Things run pretty smooth around here,so I think women are superior to men. And i know my wife would agree too. She loves me but keeps me in my place. chapped lipped hubbyJan 07 2004 2:35pm Jen and Mariah ,you two Superior Women rock.I totally agree with yall. humble hubbyJan 07 2004 4:07pm It is true, a woman who understands how to manipulate the male psyche can have a man completely under her thumb. There is a definite female advantage. SophieJan 30 2004 10:25pm I wear the pants in my family. I make more money and work as a supervisor for a large company. I also make him wear what I tell him to wear. Around the house he wears my dresses and skirts and when he goes out or to work I let him wear a pair of my (ladies) pants. I really do wear the pants as my job requires me to wear a suit and I much prefer a pants suit. I have some old skirt suits that I don't wear and I make my husband wear them too. GwenFeb 20 2004 8:44pm In our household the woman is superior, and I'm glad. She controls the finances, important decisions, etc. I really like it that way. She definitely wears the pants in our house. Every night when I get home from work I must stop at the door and take off my pants and hand them to her while she hands me a frock so I can start doing the housework and I love it! DavidFeb 20 2004 9:38pm I too like the idea of the woman being in charge! Where can I find one? StanFeb 21 2004 12:21pm Girls naturally live longer. Nature gave girls a really big advantage biologically. I learned really at a young age that I could control my brothers and other boys with ease, just because I am female. That even made them admit they acknowledge their own inferiority. Now as an adult, I am getting lower auto and life insurance rates because I am female. It is so obvious, nature really made females superior. Thanks, nature! KellyFeb 22 2004 5:35pm I was a woman once, but I got a sex change because I wanted to be a man. LieberFeb 25 2004 7:54pm Make no mistake about it, women are clearly the stronger sex. Not only have women passed men up in physical fitness and agility, it is also happening in schools as boys gradually fall behind the girls intellectually. Generations of past have conditioned boys to believe the female is the weaker of the sexes. But in today's world, that situation has been completely reversed. MelanieMar 06 2004 9:11pm There is no doubt. women are the superior sex. I have been married for almost 30 years now and, while I didn't always believe this to be true, I realize this more and more with each passing day. Ron J.Mar 07 2004 9:04pm All of these arguments going back and forth between the sexes about who the stronger sex is, draws me to only one inescapable conclusion. The world is doomed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! MeMar 10 2004 5:44am I don't know if this is true, but they say that pound for pound, women are the physically superior sex. Has anyone had the experience to test these theories out, or have you seen and physical battles in which the woman is able to defeat a man of equal size in a physical battle? I would be interested in hearing any true life experiences from other people. With women and girls surpassing men and boys in colleges and highschools, can we make the assumption that women are truly more superior in their intelligence, or are they just superior in their wisdom on how to use their intelligence? These are interesting times that we are living in, and women are making them more interesting and challenging every day. Steven LMar 10 2004 6:52pm not really, women would be stronger for each pound of muscle, but women carry more fat than men on there bodies, im not sure of the exact percentage but a female would have to significantly outweigh the male in muscle, and not fat. say a woman of 180 lbs with a bmi of 16% would theoretically be stronger than a male of 150 lbs bmi 16%. MarvinMar 11 2004 5:57pm Women live longer than men. They're just healthier and wiser, while men on the other hand seem to be on the decline both physically and intellectually. The scientific community has determined that males are indeed the "weaker sex". It involves the XY chromosomes in males vs. the XX in females. It does appear to make for a strong case that men need more of God's protection in order to survive. MarciaMar 12 2004 10:08pm I really wish that when someone votes that they would also add a comment. That is part of the fun of participating in these polls, to hear what others have to say about an issue. (That does not include however, all those people who would use the opportunity to say things like "Drop dead or worse".) I voted and had my say as well. Steven LMar 21 2004 3:48am I think the superiority of women has been a well known secret for a long time. RobMar 21 2004 5:14pm I think you're all nuts!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Testosterone ManMar 22 2004 4:15pm I have a question for Rob. If the "superiority" of women has been well known for a long time, then how could it ever have been a secret? PLMar 22 2004 4:32pm Females are the main, important sex; males are the subordinate, inferior sex. A world of just Females is possible since Females can potentially reproduce without males. A world of just males is impossible since males can't reproduce without Females. males are entirely dependent on Females for their reason to exist at all in the universe--which is why men are inferior by their nature to Women. Queen BeeMar 23 2004 11:48pm Do you know why women do not believe that life begins at conception? Because then they would have to recognize that it is actually the man who creates the child and not the woman. They believe life begins at birth, so they alone created the child, which is nonsense. At the moment of conception, everyone knows that the egg will eventually take human shape, and not that of a cat, dog, cow, chicken, etc. Life begins at conception and no matter how many people argue to the contrary, no human woman has ever given birth to anything other than a human baby, except maybe in the National Enquirer. Life begins at conception, otherwise the egg would not be able to grow at all. Case closed. The liberal argument is lost!!!!!!!!! Queen Bee's SonMar 24 2004 5:52pm I dont think women are superior to men, but I know that a lot of men think they are superior to women. It really pisses me off when men say women cant do something just because of their sex. Women can do anything men can do, and men need to realize that. I dont see why women have to prove their worth to men every day, just to get the respect they already deserve. So to the men out there that think they are better than women.... wake up, we can do anything you can do, and sometimes better EmilyMar 24 2004 9:16pm Women are, in general, superior to men. Men are larger, faster and stronger, but women have greater endurance. We will probably witness a series of new olympic sports, based around tests of endurance, at which women will excel. Women's intelligence is at least the equal of men's, and women have intellectual skills that are far better suited to the modern world than men. Women have greater resistance to disease and live longer, healthier lives. We won't know what women are fully capable of achieving because they have been suppressed by male-dominated society for so long (thousands of years?). Now that women are gaining independence, they've proven that they can not only compete well against men, but in many ways they excel. There is a groundswell of increased involvement of women in all areas of society: business large and small, education, politics, religion, even in technology (though women still lag behind men here). Not only are more women going to college and university, they are blossoming and excelling, winning most of the academic awards. The transition has been very dramatic, and the revolution continues. At some critical point, women will look around and notice that now they are in all positions of power and influence, and at that point the fate of patriarchy will be sealed forever. A network of powerful women can pass legislation favorable to their agenda. Men would be wise to realise that has already happened, and make adjustments to their behaviour, otherwise they will become totally marginalized. For a man to survive in the new reality, he had better pay attention to what women demand, and deliver it! I actually believe many men will be far better off serving only women's needs, and subconsciously they already know it. With women in positions of power, they will need a lot of support from their men, but in the end it will be a win-win situation for all. an admirer of womenMar 25 2004 12:40pm PL: It was a figure of speech, intended to point out the irony of men trying to deny what they actually know is true. Get it? "well known" and "secret". Well known because they are aware of it. Secret because they don't want to admit it. RobMar 25 2004 11:09pm Reading all this back and forth crap makes me wish we were asexual. you guys really believe nature intended for a sex to be inferior? why don't you just spit in the face of nature and the human species. Both sexes have a distinct purpose and several different characteristics that make us what we are. Male humans can do some tasks better than females and vice versa, to compare them like this is a waste of time. RalphMar 26 2004 8:05pm Whenever I read or hear that women are better than men, or that women are superior to males I'm in total agreement. I grew up in a home with three older sisters and our mother. I was the only male in the house, and I already knew at a young age that I was the weaker sex. Sometimes I even felt very inferior to my sisters and females in general, but my sisters never put me down and always treated me kindly. My mother and sisters always gave me confidence and helped me to develope a healthy male ego, supporting me in masculine activities and sports. When I think back on those days, I now realize that the most valuable things learned in my life were taught to me by women or by my observation of women. The most meaningful conversations were always with women; my mother, my sisters, and their friends. I learned that women do things with far more wisdom and grace than men. Males always try to dominate and break and mold things to whatever they want. To understand, men disassemble, deconstruct and break things. But women approach new things like calm fluid water wrapping and emerging themselves with it to understanding and clarity. Men just don't understand this way of being, but then men are very simple and single minded creatures. Women are far more complex than are males, but that is the true beauty of women - their complexity. Understanding women's complexity is like unwrapping a gift, or working a new puzzle. Actually, its quite fun trying to understand women but many males are just to impatient. The more I learn about and understand women the more impressed I feel. Their empathy, grace, wisdom, endurance, capability, and I believe, superior intellegence all impress me. When I hear it said that women are superior to men I say to myself, "It's true!" I love women and I'm glad they are better than me, it's men that benefit the most from women's superiority. Mark JeffriesMar 28 2004 1:13am The female of the species is obviously superior. Ashley Montagu documented this well many years ago in the 1st edition of his seminal book "The Natural Superiority of Women". It has been reconfirmed by many studies since. It's amazing it's not common knowledge by now! PeteMar 30 2004 10:20pm Yeah, it was a real f****** utopia under my chronically bipolar, child abusing stepmother. I know the truthMar 31 2004 5:53pm Women are smarter, stronger, and better than men. Every day we are proving it true. Women are not going to be held down anymore, or play DUMB to spare fragile male egos. If males can't keep pace with women today (and most can't) too bad!!! We are showing and proving our true potential and the male gender is finding himself outclassed. I know it sounds like I hate men, but I don't. I think men are important and valuable, its just that women aren't going to be put down anymore by those males that can't accept our participation in society. S. K.Apr 01 2004 1:06pm How could you NOT believe that women are superior? Women are beautiful, impressive, and special people. I love women, they're the BEST! I Luv WomenApr 02 2004 6:36pm Always remember, "A WOMAN is always a WOMAN, but a man ain't nothing but a male." I am WOMANApr 04 2004 10:16am I think it's healthy to admit that the female is naturally superior. She is obviously the one who calls the shots. Women are not controlled by men, it is the other way around. It is the woman who controls the relationship, not the man. Why not stop pretending that equality is even possible? JohnApr 04 2004 11:49pm I agree with the previous post, relationships are better when the woman makes the rules. Women are more wise and make better decisions than males. Women are better at managing the family finances, and plan better for the future. I don't think men have to be frightened by a woman's power in a relationship, if the woman really cares for her man she will always do the right thing. Males have to learn to accept feminine power now, or they will just be miserable in their relationships. Male dominance is no longer valid today, its the women that rule! AnonymousApr 05 2004 11:47am Women are more than likely much superior emotionally, doesn't take much to see that women are obviously given more emotional power than men. However, I gotta say most all women are absolutley retarded in the common sense department, seriously, most women show a complete lack of common sense and when you point it out to them they just stare at you with "deer in headlights" syndrome. Even if women could be proven superior in every other catagory, men were by far blessed with superior logic. TomApr 06 2004 8:30pm Are women superior to men? Just look around you.A woman doesn't have to be stronger than a man to overpower him,and doesn't have to be smarter than him (though she often is) to control him.A woman has an innate power over a man that he is incapable of resisting.Does a man have a similar power over a woman? No.I think it's obvious. PRApr 06 2004 8:44pm I think that "Rule by Women", whether it is in government, business, the courts, or especially at home, is an irresistable mental aphrodisiac for most men. Women of power is a new thing in society. It is a new way for men to be seduced by women. After all, we know most men have a built-in, hardwired attraction towards women that they can do nothing about. So the advancement of women to positions of power and influence is driven by men's sexual desire. admirer of womenApr 07 2004 10:46am Another weak one-liner by an angry, man-hating woman, with no clue at all. A WOMAN is a WOMAN but a man is nothing but a male. Very clever, and very chauvinistic. It's too bad that you think that all women are superior to all men. I know some very inferior women and some men who are definitely better at being human than they are. But, blind, angry people like you will never see anyone's opinions or ideas other than your own or those wimps who agree with you. RandyApr 11 2004 2:29am I'm a male and I agree with the post, "A WOMAN is always a WOMAN, but a man ain't nothing but a male". Until we males can measure up to the level of what women have now become, we'll just continue to be nothing but a male -- the weaker sex. Just a maleApr 12 2004 2:43pm When looked at from many different viewpoints one can quickly come to the realization that Females are indeed the superior gender. From the very outset of life to the very end of life there are many factors and evidence that shows just how superior Women are to men. DougApr 12 2004 9:57pm You people need to stop the hate and apreciate, all are equal in the eyes of the just. JakeApr 19 2004 8:39pm I've noticed the overwhelming favoring towards females, not only on this poll site, but everywhere I've seen similar questions. Is voting anonymously the only way men can be honest? Is the male ego that fragile? Face it, guys, women are superior! Women always win. A man who can admit female superiority is acting like a real man; earning respect by giving it to the women who deserve it. Any man who argues this is all wet, in my book! JasmineApr 26 2004 12:31am Overall, I would have to say women are superior, not by a landslide, but just slightly overall. Men have physical power, aggression, and sharp instincts. These would have made Men superior in 300 A.D. but in today's world women are adapting quickly and actually are proving better at many jobs. Male's natural aggression will keep them alive in politics and law, but most other careers women can outperform men. and since technology is eliminating the need for physical strength, the jobs that men can outdo women on base on physical abilities simply won't exist. JimApr 26 2004 5:53pm Men are smarter and stronger, truthfully speaking. In fact over 95% of major inventions in the last 100 years were created by males. Men are to provide for women, and women are to provide nuture to their husband and children. Guess what? The average high school boy, who wins his district championship in track, could easily beat a woman who wins an olympic gold in track. Just stop dreaming -- the only thing women in power would do is what Hillary Clinton, Emma Goldman, and Delila did. TruthApr 29 2004 11:18pm Females are definetly the more superior sex. Their logic & reasoning is alot more acute then men's. It's a shame that there aren't more females in power. A lot of males still think they live in victorian times, were the woman didn't have a say. The young generation is what will make the difference to the world. There judgments aren't outdated. DarleneMay 03 2004 10:26pm I will never say that women are inferior to men, but for all those men and women who believe that women are superior just because they aren't the ones who started the wars and are more reasonable, honest, and nurturing, please look up this one person's name on the Internet and research it. You will have your answer there. Her name is Ann Coulter. This one woman alone proves that women are not inately superior to men. RandyMay 05 2004 12:06pm Jasmine is a female chauvinist pig, as sexist as any man. She is living in a fool's paradise, women do not always win. Look at the world around you and this will be your proof. I suppose in her eyes, I am all wet. Well, if that it is the case, then I hope I drown in that wetness. RandyMay 05 2004 12:08pm On the contrary, Ann Coulter is a very successful and influencial woman. She is ambitious and competitive. If she wasn't, she wouldn't be famous enough for you to use as an example. You have unwittingly provided a supportive argument for the superiority of women. ErinMay 05 2004 11:37pm The sooner women get their emotions under control and stop aimlessly competing with men the happier they will be. Women need the leadership and guidance of men. Without men women are lone sheep without a flock. danMay 08 2004 9:29pm The question of superiority of one sex over the other is beside the question of the validity of these claims about copulins. In other words, the existence of copulins and/or their proposed effects has nothing to do with female superiority. Incidentally, the claims appear to be bogus. The links to research don't lead to any articles supporting the claims of this website. anonMay 10 2004 10:52pm Evidence of the superiority of women is all around us, you don't need a website to confirm it. SandyMay 11 2004 10:32am Superior at what? I'm sure I could build a stone fence much faster than most women. John IIMay 11 2004 11:37am That is correct, John II. A woman doesn't need to build a stone fence, she can influence a slower witless male like yourself to build one for her. empress koiMay 11 2004 12:59pm Nice comeback. I haven't got much to say after that one. John IIMay 11 2004 1:32pm Superior at what you ask? Are you sure you are ready for the answer? Women make better managers. Women have better senses (smell, taste, touch). Women have better communication skills. Women have better facial recognition. Women have better memories. Women make better liars. Women are safer drivers. Women, as a rule, eat better and take better care of themselves. Women use both sides of their brain and are better at multitasking. Women tolerate pain better. Women have greater stamina. Pound for pound, women are stronger. Women learn better, primarily because they aren't afraid to ask questions (are directions when lost). Women are less suceptible to certain diseases, they mature earlier and live longer. Women are filling the colleges and universities of the world and aremgetting more degrees. (I could also mention its males who fill the prisons, have more learning difficulties and emotional disorders). Women are increasing their number in science, sports, anything they want. Now that men aren't holding them down, the reality of one gender being superior to the other is becoming clear to anyone who isn't afraid to accept the truth. Women are clearly superior. - - So yes, most men may be able to build a stone fence faster, but most women can have male slaves if they put their mind to it! Think about it. Sexual power alone is enough to enslave a male, female superiority justs adds to the humiliation of the male. Better get used to it because men can't evolve quick enough to catch up. Women all over the world are controlling the men in their lives. (Male slavery isn't a majority option yet but who knows what the future holds?) Personally I think most women take control without going as far as enslaving their partner... this is primarily a male trait. So overall, female superiority and female rule will bring a more peaceful world. Sam the techy guyMay 24 2004 2:52pm What is all this fuss about??? Women are the BEST, they are the better sex. It's just a simple fact that women are superior, get over it guys. It's to our benefit as males that women are better, really! We get more from women because of their superiority than they get from us. Women have to put up with males, they are the ones that really loose! Guys, lets just give up this poor Fragile Male Ego Syndrome crap, the women are gonna leave us behind if we don't measure up! Get Over It Dudes!!!May 25 2004 12:07pm As hard as it is to admit it, women are superior in most ways. Now they are in the gyms pumping iron. Don't underestimate the outcome with this as well. They are becoming physically stronger at a very fast pace. I know of several men that can no longer beat the wife at such things as arm wrestling. Asked why? She has been weight lifting they say. Some dudeMay 26 2004 2:08pm I love women, everything about them is so fine! I'm glad women are better than me, it all makes perfect sense to me. Happy guy who LOVES Women!May 27 2004 6:13pm As a guy, I have to admit it, women are the superior sex. KenMay 27 2004 8:07pm Some women are not capable of a honest and intelligent debate from the looks of some of the hateful comments posted here, whew! BTMay 29 2004 6:04pm It all doesn't matter anymore because all of us, male or female, are going straight to hell.... bummerMay 29 2004 7:22pm The superiority of one sex is a matter of what is being measured. Let's look at the world. Inadequate birth control. Cause-Men. Wars. Cause-Men. Environmental Devastation. Cause-Men. Rape. Cause-Men. Of course men will hide behind women, claiming they're wrecking the planet, killing the 'enemy' to protect 'their' women. But the overwhelming number of polluters, tyrants, killers, torturers, rapists are men. Hmmm,...I would have to say the male sex is quite superior in these areas. nyarMay 31 2004 11:45pm I would add to nyar's list that men have superior egos. But this will change as women and men both see who is best. JimJun 03 2004 4:52am Going head to head, I'll put my money on the women. They are so motivated and full of energy, it's their spirit that is moving society today. All indicators show the future is a Woman's World. We men better measure up soon or the ladies are going to leave us far behind. The way everything looks now most males don't seem to give a darn about the future. It appears that a DARK era for the male gender could be starting. G. DavisJun 03 2004 11:30am Also, consider all the "women are superior" type of polls here. Almost all women feel they are superior, and many men agree. So that makes about 2/3 of the total population who think women are superior--a very remarkable trend. HHJun 04 2004 9:53am What I think is interesting is that men are starting to get a snootful of the same kinds of techniques that they once used to control women. For a long time, women who stood up for themselves were dismissed as being unpleasant and unattractive. Now it will be men who offend womens who are defined in a negative way. Men will be led to accept being pretty, gentle, thoughtful and nice. It is one thing to be an aggressive male living in a male dominated society and have the fantasy of being controlled by a woman. It is another thing to realize that the best jobs, the best schools and the most attractive women are all going to go to the most unthreatening males. Body hair, man the razors--- there is already a trend toward men shaving body (and pubic) hair to please women. Male perfume--- check. Feminized clothing--- hey John Wayne wouldn't be caught dead in a lot of contemporary male clothing. Briefs made with cute printed fabric--- check. Hey is this ringing a bell? Women will encourage men to be as much like them as possible because doing so means that men will always fail in the task. That will reinforce the power of women. The development of the submissive male and dominant female is already well under way. One poll showed that while 68 percent of men had had the fantasy of being spanked by a woman, only 17 percent of women had the fantasy of being spanked by a man. It didn't say how many women wanted to be able to spank a man. My guess is that whatever that number is, it is only going to go up. THWJun 05 2004 11:12am The power of the submissive male is to give the woman power over himself. As soon as the male gets his "fix", he returns to the real world at the helm of leadership. Having a woman spank you is not indicative of a power change, because this fetish has been in existence since early civilization. The only way women will rule is if they proactively, under good leadership, take the leadership for themselves. It's a lost cause, this feminine dominance idea. Give it up. HHJun 07 2004 8:18am Right On Brother AnonymousJun 07 2004 7:39pm Isolate yourself if you must, but in most households it is the woman who controls the finances. A woman who holds the pursestrings has control of the man in her life. That is where it all begins. If you have not noticed that women are taking matters into their own hands, you are trying not to see it to protect your pride. HansJun 07 2004 8:02pm Hans you are weak, plain and simple. I know plenty of women who simple could not handle finances and got it to trouble, so their husbands handle it from then on. BillJun 08 2004 12:23am Marketing companies know that women control the majority of household purchases and they market to the decision makers. AnonymousJun 08 2004 7:22am Hans, the husband GIVES the wife control of the pursestrings. I, for one, after coming home from a day of responsibility at work, don't want the responsibility of the finances at home. HHJun 08 2004 7:35am Oh B.S., HH! Everyone knows if Mama ain't happy nobody is happy. Women control the finances in most families because they are more practical and better shoppers than men. Men are more likely to throw family money away on gambling, booze, and porn. Women rule the house and money in most families. Any Fortune 500 marketing number cruncher would tell you the same! M. RobinsonJun 08 2004 7:54am I am a White Man! White ManJun 08 2004 11:07am Where are your facts, M. Robinson. I'm telling you how it is in my house. HHJun 08 2004 2:15pm I think HH lives alone, probably with two cats and pet fish. Every man in a long term relationship and marriage knows that the woman rules the house. You get her upset and you pay, and you pay, and you pay.... HH obviously is some school kid out for the summer vacation, but some day you'll be with a woman long term and all will be clear to you my young lad. M. RobinsonJun 08 2004 6:03pm The man has no choice but to surrender the pursestrings if his wife demands it. A woman has a way of turning a man's life upside-down if she isn't satisfied with the status quo. AnonymousJun 08 2004 9:56pm M. Robinson calm, calm down! Why are you getting so worked up because someone lives differently than you? Must be your Fragile Male Ego, I personally know several men whose wives are terrible with finances and have gotten into debt trying to manage them. These woman admit their husbands should control the finances because they are simply better at it. Its not a personal attack on all women, some men are better and some women are better. DanJun 08 2004 11:36pm It seems as if these days women are finally claming their "power". Personally I have no problem kissing the feet of a Goddess, she can walk all over me if she likes....just please take off the high heels first. kissingherfeetJun 09 2004 7:03am Sheeesh, just how many submissive men are there on this site? AmyJun 09 2004 3:25pm The answer to the question "how many submissive men are there on this site" is "none." There are, however, quite a few men who like to pretend they are submissive. In reality men do nothing to upset the tradition male dominance in society. A Real ManJun 09 2004 4:51pm Amy-sorry if input from a submissive man upsets you. A real man-I bet that you have a case of "yes dear" syndrome at home...not out with your buddies, just when you are alone with your wife. KHFJun 11 2004 10:31pm It is so easy to control a guy. At swim practice, us girls love to tease the guys. At dive-ins or warmup, it is so funny to make a guy erect in his speedos. They are like so helpless then. AnonymousJun 11 2004 11:27pm The point is that men can easily be controlled when women choose to control them. More and more women are choosing to exercise this control. The old strategy of using sexual aggressiveness against women is being turned against men. It is against the law for men to do what women can do with confidence. A Real ManJun 17 2004 10:55am True. There is a double standard today. A woman can do just about anything she wants, but men must be very careful how they act or even speak these days. If you even say the wrong thing you are cast out. Men are being restricted by rules which were put in place to favor women. In the long run we are creating a society which will give women the rights to keep men at bay. PaulJun 19 2004 5:30am "In the long run we are creating a society which will give women the rights to keep men at bay." ------- as it should be! AnonymousJun 19 2004 11:06am I am sick and tired of seeing women lead their husbands around by the nose. If men don't watch out they will wind up wiht nose rings to make being led around that much easier. Old Fashioned ManJun 21 2004 1:33pm I could see that happening but maybe the ring won't be in the nose. Women have put up with about enough and for too long. It is time we called the shots. I, for one, am not going to wait around. My husband understands that I wear the pants in our marriage and that is fine with him. I think that if more women really asserted themselves they would be quite surprised to see how quickly men submit to female authority. After all, they grew up with female authority figures around them all the time. They are conditioned to accept our mastery, all we have to do is push the right buttons. Heather MorganJun 21 2004 5:18pm A woman after my own heart! Go Ms. Morgan. Superior women are finally taking charge of the men in their lives and the world as a whole will be a better place when all men accept and submit to female power and superiority. Women: you HAVE more power then you realize... just use it. SamJun 22 2004 8:27am Sorry, typo there (THAN/THEN), mean to write: Women: you HAVE more power than you realize... just use it. SamJun 22 2004 8:29am When I was a boy my cousin, a girl my age. When we would get together she always wanted to wrestle. She always won and would not let me up until I stated that "Girls are better than boys." When I was a teenager, I used to swim at the community pool and whenever a certain lifeguard was on duty (she was an older teenager and very strict about the rules) I always seemed to act up. Her punishement for me was to make me stand in a corner facing the wall until she gave me permission to move. I will never forget the way she would call me before her... sitting high in her lifeguard chair and scold me in front of everyone before sending me to the corner. As I said, she was very strict but especially with the boys. Girls somehow got more latitude. When I became an adult, I entered a line of work (in health care) that routinely put me under the authority of some pretty impressive women. Here is what I have discovered. When you work under women and you show them that you are willing to be obedient to them (and not say a word about it) they will begin acting very much like that lifeguard. There is the "joking" about the superiority of women. There is the scolding-- I have found that many women like to scold a subordinate male in front of other women. There are the sly bits of praise about how nice it would be "if all men were like you." Fortunately for me, I married one of these women and now I have to pledge allegience to the superiority of women at work and at home. A submissive manJun 22 2004 1:58pm TMI A real manJun 28 2004 10:27am RBD A New WomanJun 29 2004 11:26am YDC a manJun 29 2004 11:29am It's the sicko attitude from submissive men that makes "female dominance" a perverse term. Why does it have to be so icky? AnonymousJun 30 2004 7:48am People fear what they do not understand Another AnonymousJun 30 2004 10:07am One must seperate fantasy from reality. The posts from submissives are plain ridiculous, but at the same time, it is pretty obvious women are turning the tables on us. AnonymousJun 30 2004 10:39am Yes, there's the reality, and then there's this clown show on the side. The family household of the future is going to look just the same as today, but the woman will call most of the shots; this idea of men groveling on dogleashes under the stern gaze of a leather-clad woman waving a whip is not only demeaning to women, it's just dorky. Kevin Canadian BaconJul 01 2004 11:01am Men groveling on the end of dog leashes.... Hmmmmm. Where have I seen that before? AnonymousJul 01 2004 11:38am On the evening news. I guess it is a sign of the times. BarbJul 02 2004 10:33am Many men think that the future will see greater powwe in the hands of women. Most of them think that little will change as a result of the move to matriarchy. There is a name for that point of view... It is called wishful thinking. There are more women than men enrolled in American universities. In this society education is the key to power. As women gain power they will "pull up the drawbridge" behind them and you can expect men to be at an increasing disadvantage. A submissive manJul 02 2004 11:53am Women will not do this to men. Women marry men and love them. Women are the daughters of fathers whom they love. Women give birth to sons whom they love. A good woman will do anything in her power to help the men in her life succeed. You submissive men act like women want men to have less than women, but you forgot that women are the caretakers in society. HHJul 06 2004 8:23am Women are the caretakers of society for one reason and one reason only and its not because of nature. It is because this is the position they have been placed in since time began. There is no guarantee that they would want to be caretakers if given absolute power. As women gain more power you will see more abuses and all the rationalizing and justifying in the world will not hide the truth. RandyJul 16 2004 2:52am I have wrestled my wife several times and loose. This is not a choice "I'm not submissive", it's the results of her workouts while I'm at work she lifts weights at home. The wrestling starts off fairly even but after awhile my strength is drained and I feel her strength come on until I'm being squashed by her muscles. She has really built her muscles up in a short time and have become a little larger than mine. I work out when I get home sometimes but she now has the advantage. RickJul 18 2004 8:34am Maybe you're just a puss, Rick ShockoJul 20 2004 8:49am Rick, you read too much, your story is a fabrication of articles that you (he/she) want to get a point across from. AnonymousJul 20 2004 9:28pm So by Rick's rational, Mike Tyson is superior because he can beat the poo out of most people. AnonymousAug 02 2004 10:40am Shocko & Anonymous, you know it's real funny that for God only knows how long men have held that strength factor over women AS SUPERIOR! Whole cultures designed by men to keep women under the thumbs of men because men used strength to force their superiority on women. Now in the middle east it's not so easy to wrap your old lady up in some stupid cloth and beat her with a stick is it? In free countries women strip down to work out clothes and pump iron and are finding they have muscles and some have big muscles and are stronger than most men. So get used to it dumb poos as we aren't going for that f*cking crap any longer without a real fight that you will loose. Yep real funny bozos, it was "superiority" when you were stronger but now it's not? Jokes on you. Look around at the polls, the chat rooms, the surveys. What do they say? I love men but I'm not falling for your line any more. Don't worry we won't treat you as bad as you have us for centuries, we're not that stupid. No apology.. Free WomanAug 02 2004 11:22pm Free Woman. Mike Tyson is an idiot and a rapist. He could kill me with his bare hands but that, in my opinion doesn't make him superior. If your vision of strength is judged purely on the physical then you are going to regard a lot of average people as being your superior. I wasn't around 500 years ago to partake in that anitquated notion you mentioned and I don't buy into it now. Never have but you seem to have missed my point in your rage. still anonymousAug 16 2004 7:42pm anonymous, I agree with you about Mikey. It's just that men have used strength to put women in a second class & men as superior and still do. Look at men of the middle east, they have contrived every possible scheme to keep women as low as dogs and continue to do so to this day. This is not 500 years ago either. Many men fear women becoming powerful and this I beleive is why we have had fashion models with weak bodies as the image of women we should want. Just another form of middle east mentality and about as absurd as men starved in concentration camps as fashion. For some reason many men fear women of power, any power. Men often fear women of physical strength even more and most likey it is because they no longer perceive themselves as superior. Deep in their subconscious minds they may not like a female boss at work but if they are stronger or more muscular they tend to be more relaxed. The last straw that they can't take mentally is her physical strength becoming superior. This is not with all men but most are very uncomfortable with this position and men have contrived ways to prevent this from happening for most of human history and not just 500 years ago. You need to take a look at women's history and that includes sports. It was a woman that won a bicycle race against men about a century ago so what did men do? They baned women from racing and required them to wear bloomers that confined movement. The same happened with a running race when a female won they were no longer allowed in a race. It is only very recently that women are becoming free to partake in more sports. Antiquated? Shure it is but it is men that have kept this way of thinking going for as long as possible. Much of the world is still very antiquated to this day. In the orient it is still a practice to bind women's feat so they can't grow, thus they are weakened, you shure can't jog in a burka in the middle east with a man hitting you with a stick isn't helping either. But at least YOU see these things as antiquated but you don't have the time frame right. Free WomanAug 17 2004 9:42am I agree with you. My reference to 500 years ago was arbitrary and not actually with feminism exclusively in mind. By Victorian times, Europeans seemed to believe they had a right to dominate the rest of the world because of their perceived cultural superiority, not simply because of military strength. You might be relieved to know that the Chinese stopped binding women's feet in 1911, when the last emperor was diposed. The emperor couldn't conceive of a woman not wanting to live in the forbidden city as one of his 72 wives or one of his couple of thousand concubines and with all those eunichs to take care of her. Obviously it wasn't very nice but he thought it was the greatest place in all the world and anybody, male or female, who dared to disagree with the emperor risked decapitation. Thus, his opinion was upheld - women are insane and if we don't bind their feet, they'll run away from home. Anyway, that centuries old practice was first questioned in 1898 when 6 intellectuals visited France and they noticed among many other things that women didn't run away from home and, AND, they had normal feet. So it took them 13 years to get rid of the emperor. I was told that in most professions, there is still a stigma attached to having a female boss there but the guys I asked didn't seem to think it was too weird or embarrassing. I also noticed that the women there aren't at all passive and one of them told me that Mao made sure that legally, they are equal to men (he had a strong, independent wife don't forget.) Things remain quite awful in rural areas throughout the world but big cities are mostly quite western by necessity. Yes, there are cultural barriers to overcome but they're doing it most everywhere, slowly but surely. Back here, I personally am more impressed with the educational gains women are making than the physical gains. AnonymousAug 19 2004 7:29am I probably should have added that it is more common for men to leave the family not women. So maybe men are insane. AnonymousAug 19 2004 9:23am If women are taking over then how come things are not getting any better? Men or women in charge is not the real issue. The issue is can a civil society be built is which common interests are given equal consideration to self interest. Women talk a big talk about the wars men fight, the poverty that male society creates, etc. but would they run anything better? Women are more materialistic then men and many instintinctively hate the poor, inspite of what they might openly say about the issue. Do you honestly think that the female corporate despots of the future are really going to siphon money out of their luxury car/male stripper/interior design/fine dining/yacht/cosmetic surgury fund to help charity? AaronAug 25 2004 7:59pm Aaron, Actually it is well documented that women give more of their money to charity than men, and women volunteer more than men. Your notion that women are somehow more wasteful and selfish than men is really a myth. xyAug 28 2004 9:19am Women maintain muscle much better than men. Women are biologically superior. Women are intellectually superior. Sorry, guys. AnonymousSep 06 2004 8:40am yawn.yawn.yawn.women maintain muscle better then men,jesus dont make me laugh,the amount of fat and unfit women i see are everywere,they are born lazy.I was in the british army,and we had to drop are standards to get the right ratio of female soldiers in,as they just could not make the standards that even 17 yr old boys could do. fredSep 07 2004 12:40pm grow up fred,the world has changed,and women are going to be the new leaders,and men like you from the old ways will be powerless to do anything to stop it. johnMSep 07 2004 12:43pm yawn.yawn.yawn.women maintain muscle better then men,jesus dont make me laugh,the amount of fat and unfit women i see are everywere,they are born lazy.I was in the british army,and we had to drop are standards to get the right ratio of female soldiers in,as they just could not make the standards that even 17 yr old boys could do. fredSep 07 2004 12:44pm It's all fair and well that women are doing better in education and management and such but you guys are just masterbating if you think women are making enormous gains physically. Fred has a point. The Women's Olympic record for the 100 meters is 10.54 and the last time that would have won a men's 100 meter dash is 1928. It's pretty much the same in every single event. If you calculate how much women have improved vs how much men have improved, it's not overwhelming at all. Especially when you consider how inferior the coaching and competition was for the women back then. They are still much smaller than men are on average and a fit woman will still have a higher fat to muscle ratio than a fit man, that is simply a biological requirement that comes with the ability to give birth. Women may have the intellectual edge but men have the physical edge. AnonymousSep 07 2004 2:12pm Fred, while women usually do not build muscle as fast as men, they (women) do not loose muscle or atrophy as fast as men. Most noticable is after about 40 years old. One example is how women astronauts are not as effected as the men in extended space flight. Only women walk away from such long flights, men must be pushed in a wheel chair or carried because their muscles have become much weaker from weightlessness. Wome pound for pound usually have stronger muscular contractions with about 75% more muscular endurance but men have larger muscles and usually great physical strength as a result. Plenty of men are finding out that when a woman does build her muscles to the same mass as his (not an easy task for a woman)they find out she has become physically stronger. It's not an every day thing but is the case more and more now days. BudSep 07 2004 5:04pm I have never heard of anything that women couldn't do better than men!! I wish that men would die out soon!Sep 09 2004 2:35am Women are better equipped to deal with anything short of battle and lifting. Women are also capable of using their own gifts to gain and exert control over men. This is a fact. Period. WilliamSep 16 2004 12:01pm Ask yourselves this ladies: If you are truly as superior as you would like to present yourselves, why this extreme hostility towards boys and men? And no, it is not just here it is a very common phenomenon in the popular culture of western societies. And to all the men who support this extremely oversimplified viewpoint. Try thinking a bit harder, how can someone be generally superior? Is a formula one car superior to a truck? Well, that depends on the particular situation. I am not at all impressed with the level of discussion here. LKSep 23 2004 8:31am LK, we are not talking about cars and trucks here. We are talking about the natural order of things. Women give birth to all of us. Women are the creators and the primary form of the species. If there is hostility toward males in popular culture these days - it is because there is a need to turn the tables after millenia of hostility toward females. You only need to look at the middle east and asia to see how women are still seen as inferior. The fact that there is a trend toward female superiority is the best thing that could happen to our culture. XySep 24 2004 9:40am Xy - cars and trucks, it was a metaphor. Let me explain the point, my friend. There simply is no way in which you can be superior in all aspects, not even in the vast majority of aspects. Let me try with another easier metaphor. If you want to be the best sumowrestler you would have to take measures that would remove you from being, say, the best ballet dancer. Do you get it know? The term 'general superiority' is what linguists call an oxymoron. You also state "The fact that there is a trend toward female superiority is the best thing that could happen to our culture" Well, how utterly naive. You present yourself as an expert - but plainly, you have understood nothing of evolutionary biology. If western culture becomes matriarchal we will all eventually have to submit to the patriarchies of the middle east and the far east you apparently despise. I for one would never enroll to defend a culture which does not count me just becuase I am XY. LKSep 24 2004 11:21am I like you LK but you made one mistake when you expressed your irrational fear regarding the Mid-East. I was recently in India and they were having elections in a number of provinces. I visited 4 of them during the elections and 3 women became premiers among those 4 I visited. 3 out of 4. Benizzir Bhutto led Pakistan before Musharrif took it over in a coup. That may be a poor example because even though Pakistan sells highly enriched uranium abroad they hug commissioner Bush. "for us or against us" unless you have leverage. So I musn't criticize Pakistan. But every large city in the world is western. LK, it's because we represent the only conceivable future. Whether you like it or not, women are taking their rightful place in society. Do I worry or get an erection when I read about how much better they are doing academically. No. No, I do not get an automatic woody. 4 of the top 5 wealthiest people in the US are uni-drop-outs and MEN.Women have their place and in many instances, they should be boss and they will be boss. Your 3rd world countries know this and are ever so tentatively following our lead. Our women are a'rite. They are not perfect! They are not goddesses. They are not formidable. They are women! iskoSep 25 2004 4:22am On average, women will never and can never become stronger than men. But physique is not what determines superiority, unless you're still living in caves. HHOct 05 2004 10:05am Women today, are the stronger sex, day after day earn power in our society. my Wife rule our live, earn more than me,make all financial decisions without me,do all what she wants to do, and pretend to me myservige and obbedience, like my daughter that is 19. the world of tomorrow is female's, and we will be what they were just 200 yearsa ago: obedient,quite,submissive and cheated. a real visionOct 09 2004 11:27am Many comments are superficial. I agree with LK's points, but disagree with overall premise. I believe females are generally superior gender. It doesn't mean they're better at everything. However, even today, one can't deny the power they exert over men. Overtly, as well as subtle. As women reach higher levels of institutional power and in greater numbers, it will soon be more open and obvious. Laws passed, business decision made, etc will mostly be made by women. Women will transform society to be matriarchal. Men will over time accept their new role and their submissiveness will beome more overt. Copulins will not be required! I'm a man who increasingly accepts and looks forward to this. I'm tired of trying to be a women's equal and am ready to take on a new role. AnonymousOct 14 2004 4:39am My friends, when did this become such a childish war of the sexes? We are part of the same species, and lest you forget, we're here to be a team. Yes, science has shown that women are better at multi-tasking. But you have to look at both sides of the coin. You see, we live in a 3 dimensional world. Even using 2 dimensions, it is clear to see that if you increase the breadth or width of your activities (ie, doing many things at once), you decrease your depth of that knowledge. Men, although they have a more one track mind, are better at jobs that require deep concentration and focus to the problem at hand. These fields would include, but are not limited to: Mathematics, science, engineering, electronics, and other various technical specialties. Remember, just because someone is better at being manager doesn't mean they're better. A general is nothing without his army, a king is nothing without his kingdom. It's a symbiotic relationship. One cannot say they are better than the other, and even if they do, what does it mean? The point is, they are INCOMPLETE without each other. No matter how evolved and strong women become, they cannot escape this simple truth. Women are incomplete without men. Many years ago when the world was under a male paradigm, men did not get rid of women. If men were really as selfish as you all say they were, they would hunt and only feed themselves, while women would starve and die, and civilization would be lost. But that's not what happened. Show a small amount of gratitude. At the end of the day, you are only here because of the good man has done. And it's not a question of superiority. Different skills are worth more or less as times change. The world is moving into a more female paradigm. People are adopting more feminine views. Men will always be important, and the contributions they've made to history will be forever remembered, no matter what you say. But today, the female paradigm is becoming more prevalent. And that's ok. We're a team. You think that you don't need men. But you're wrong. If you think you can preserve sperm and women won't need men, you're wrong. Why? Because men evolve too. If you're using 50 year old sperm to populate women, the next generation will come out unevolved to the challenges of that time, and civilzation as we know it would die. We are intricately bound up within one another. Just like men need women, women need men, and no amount of feminist brainwashing will EVER change that. You can't outsmart nature. If you dwell on it, you will realize that the way the world is created, man starts and woman finishes. A small example is the process of procreation. Man is the explosive energy, woman is the more fixed but long lasting energy. You need both. A small example would be the creation of the world. Everyone knows that whether you subsribe to religion or not, the universe was created with a big bang. A huge collision of forces manifested itself and resulted in the universe. That was a male type of energy. But keeping the world running, that's the female energy. We complement each other. As a man, I respect women and love them very much. But I am confused why this apparent war and bickering that must always happen. Love and harmony is not dominance, is not control. The beauty and charm of women has always been that they can get their point across without aggression, but with tact and modesty. You claim that you are superior, but someone who is superior never has to tell anyone that he/she is. If you have to assert you are better, then you've just abdicated your superiority. I've always thought that the best example women taught the world is humility. Women don't have an ego like men. The male ego is a strange creature, yet you yourselves boast of your accomplishments, as if you've inherited it. Two wrongs don't make a right. Men will eventually deal with their insecurities, and with the fact that times have changed, and the world expects a new paradigm. But this can be done with love and understanding, which, last time I checked, were feminine values... MarkNov 14 2004 6:21am Mark, You make some interesting observations. But you're overlooking some important realities. It may be true that there are a lot of unselfish men in the world, and that male energy can accomplish amazing things...but that doesn't make them equal to women. Sure, the world needs men and women to work in harmony, but that doesn't make them equal. Men of the past claimed actual ownership of women, and they still do in some parts of the world. Patriarchal societies have treated women as inferior and still kill female babies to ensure male lineages. The male tendency to engage in brutal and destructive behavior makes the world less and less safe every generation. The constant state of war in the world escalates continually as male 'leaders' ignore the long term consequences of their actions. (There have been only a handful of women leaders of nations, and they are often bad examples of what women are capable of because they are still trying to function in an overwhelmingly male political culture and surrounded by male advisors.) Women have enormous capacity for understanding and forgiveness, but they also are not going to take male abuse forever. The outcry against men that is going on these days is the result of an increasingly unsustainable male dominated world. Women - and some men - are smart enough to see a future that fully recognises that the superiority of the female sex is the best hope for solving the worlds probnlems - even if it takes a few more generations. We can only hope that men don't destroy everything before then. wmnpowerNov 24 2004 12:57pm The evidence female superiority is becoming widely known and accepted as more people are informed of the genetic advantage of matching X-chromosomes. Future generations will never remember a time when the female was considered the "weaker sex". As the awareness and acceptance of of female superiority continues to spread, women will be encouraged to take charge more and more. This is already happening. AnonymousNov 24 2004 10:23pm wmnpower, like I said, one may be superior, but it is still INCOMPLETE. Men have dominated women for many years, yes, but as I said, this was necessary for the evolution of the world. For women to now treat men in the same way would a regression back to the 'old' ways and a disgrace to woman's enormous capacity for understanding and forgiveness, as you put it. You say that 'The male tendency to engage in brutal and destructive behavior makes the world less and less safe every generation.' That is a complete falsehood. The world now is more civilized than it EVER was. The only reason woman could rise into power, my friend, is precisely because of this. Women cannot flourish in a chaotic society. That is man's power, to take that chaos and make some semblance of it. Unforunately this is usually done with war and death, but you can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs. NOW that men have taken us this far, it's time for women to take us the rest of the way. And this is precisely what will happen. In addition, I'll have you know that many women have been BEHIND the reasons for many wars. If you don't believe that, then open up the books and read up on cleopatra, napoleon, mary antoinette, and the wars for italian independence. Women can be just as abusive as men. They have the POTENTIAL to be more understanding and forgiving, but they must DEVELOP it. I would suggest you start by not being so hateful and vengeful towards men yourself... MarkNov 25 2004 7:05am To say the world is 'more civilized than it ever was' is the falsehood. Civilization is not about technology, it is about the ability of people to live in peaceful co-existance. Frankly, I don't think the world is any more civilized now than it was a few thousand years ago. The difference is that the conflicts that occur nowadays are potentially more and more disasterous due to the overabundance of weapons of mass deatruction. How is it that such a 'civilized' world allows for the manufacture of ever more destructive machinery in the name of peace? To say that women cannot flourish in chaos and that men's power is to make order from chaos is another fallacy. It is men who create the chaos to begin with. You say that wars have been fought because of women? Another fallacy. Wars are fought because men need to fight - it's hard wired into the male psyche. Of course women can be brutal too, but there's really no comparison between the intense level of male brutality and the occasional examples on the female side.... I'm not hateful towards men. Just realistic. There are many wonderful men in the world who have done great things to benefit others. However, because of the tendency of men to exaggerate their own importance it has become necessary to remind them that women deserve much more credit than they are given. Men have the potential to be as understanding and forgiving as women - lets hope they can also develop. Men will not change without women stepping up and taking charge. If that means that the male ego suffers a few bruises, chalk it up to women taking the chaos that is patriarchy and bringing it into the future of restoring the feminine principle to its power. If you believe what you say that 'it's time for women to take us the rest of the way' you can't expect that to happen on male terms. Women will reshape society in ways that men can't yet imagine. womnpowerNov 26 2004 12:33pm You are great for a good laugh, but most if not all of the scientific community would laugh your so called "theories," of which the most blatantly false one is, as you aptly put it, " Wars are fought because men need to fight - it's hard wired into the male psyche." Let's educate you a little bit. I will refer to an excellent recent book called "The Red Queen: Sex and the evolution of human nature." pg 202: "If reproduction has been the reward and goal of power and wealth, then it is little wonder that it has also been a frequent cause and REWARD of violence. This is presumably the reason that the early Church became so obsessed with matters of sex. It recognized sexual competition to be one of the principal causes of murder and mayhem. The gradual synonomy of sex and sin in Christendom is surely based more on the fact that sex often leads to trouble rathern than there is anything inherently sinful about sex" "Consider the case of the Pitcairn Islanders. In 1790 nine mutineers landed on Pitcairn along with six males and thirteen females... Notice the imbalance, fifteen men and thirteen women. When the colony was discovered eighteen years later, ten of the women had survived and only one of the men. Of other men, one had committed suicide, one had died, and twelve had been murdered. The survivor was simply the last man left standing in an orgy of violence motivated ENTIRELY by sexual competition." pg 203: "If a war is something we interited directly from the hostility between groups of male apes over female apes, with territory as merely a means to the end --- sex --- then it follows that tribal people must be going to war over women rather than territory. For a long time anthrolopogists insisted that war was fought over scarce material resources, in particular protein... So when Napolean Chagnon... went to Venezuela... he was in for a shock: "These people were not fighting over what I was trained to believe they were fighting over --- scarce resources. They were fighting over women." And the list goes on and on. So yes, actually, you are hateful towards men, and not particularly realistic. You're only looking at the effect, without looking at the cause. Very much like the stupid practice of giving a decongestant to remove the SYMPTOMS of a cold without addressing the real cause: viruses/bacteria. Your "theories" strike a stark contrast with modern scientific and anthropological thought, whose many studies were, ironically enough, conducted by women. In addition, the very fact that women can vote, or have any rights at all, is a testament to the fact that society today is civilized more than ever. Or should we open the old history books and look at the rights of women, say, 500 years ago? Your "theories" are fooling noone, or more accurately, noone who has a brain to see how riddled with inaccuracies they are. Maybe just yourself then... MarkDec 02 2004 9:26pm So you're saying that men fight and kill each other over sex. And you're blaming women for this? You're very confused. Your comments simply point out that men are indeed hard-wired for physical conflict. You're right about women being able to vote being a sign of civilization moving in the right direction, but there are still many parts of the world where women have no rights and patriarchy is causing great suffering. By the way 'noone' is not a word...it's 'no one'...two separate words. AnonymousDec 03 2004 12:24am poo AnonymousDec 26 2004 3:04pm men maleDec 27 2004 9:21am The question of which sex is superior can be answered by listing the specific characteristics of each sex which gives them a specific advantage. Males and females are equal in many things - but there are certain advantages of each sex. Women are superior in these (partial list): Longer lifespan Better senses of smell, touch, taste, hearing, eyesight . Brain functions are better integrated - more communication between left and right. Stronger heart Better language skills Better at communicating Better at reading body language and facial expressions Better at solving problems without violence Mature faster Retain mental powers later in life Better memory Better flexibility More endurance Better fine motor skills, manual dexterity Better balance (lower center of gravity) More bouyant, better long distance swimmers. More intense sexual response - multiple orgasms. Ablility to give birth and nurse. Males are superior in these (complete list); Bigger muscles Slightly better at reading maps womyn ruleJan 11 2005 6:28pm What the world needs is more Playboy Bunnies. AnonymousJan 12 2005 3:41pm haha AnonymousJan 14 2005 2:07pm Men have better spatial reasoning which not only helps in sports but also some engineering and we also tend to be better at math. Although some of that has to do with the fact that male math geniuses outnumber female math geniuses by about 7:1. There's no appreciable difference with the rest of us. AnonymousJan 14 2005 2:46pm There may be more male 'geniuses' - which represent a tiny fraction of the population, but that is more than offset by the fact that males with learning disabilities far outnumber women. There is a small difference in the actual math skills of males and females. A much bigger difference in language skills favors women. The average 8th grade girl has better language skills than the average 11th grade boy. The fact is that the average female is smarter than the average male. More females are at the higher end of academic achievement while there are a few males at the very top, those are the exception. AnonymousJan 15 2005 11:04am Genius doesn't need to be put in quotation marks. If you have an unusually high aptitude for something, be it math, music or whatever, you're a genius. Also I didn't say there are more male geniuses, I said there are more male math geniuses. Beyond that, I don't argue that women outperform men at almost everything I was merely adding to a previous post that neglected to mention some male strengths. People on this site are loathe to give men credit for anything. I wonder how most of the men here manage to function with such low self-esteem. AnonymousJan 21 2005 9:03pm damn right, just last week it was reported that a mark as low as 50-60% will get you a B grade in some gcses in the uk.The exams today are so easy to when most of us were at school,and i have seen my daughters work for her maths gcse,and was amazed how easy the questions were.Boys are not less clever then girls,but have been let down over the last few decades,as the rush to fix girls results from the 70s and 80s have dominated everything.Of course i do not knock hard working girls,and i do know there some lazy boys but enough already.Now girls have been giving the advantage to succed then it is time,they turned there atention to boys,or do you want a generation of out of work,and out of control and angry young men.Because unlike girls,they will no doubt turn there anger,on the sex they see that has done this to them.Equality should and hopefully will be were we end up,and i truly feel for the generations of clever and smart women who were denied the chance in the past to be anything more then house wifes. paulJan 22 2005 3:49pm Why women rule is all too plain Cos men have balls and we have brains Dominant DonnaJan 30 2005 2:12am Donna, I think you just need to go get laid. AnonymousFeb 01 2005 6:45pm Shes still right though sueFeb 02 2005 4:05pm Very simple and to the point Donna. Thank you for saying so eloquently what I think we all know deep down. jasonFeb 03 2005 2:43am Yes, women are definetly taking over. They have proven themselve to be smarter and better capable of leading. Us guys who are smarter enough to realize this should except it and try to follow the lead of women. jayFeb 03 2005 4:49pm f*ck you all go to hell, die, men rule women rule it doesn't make a difference. there will still be violence, hate and a great amount of sin. Both sexes have the ability to make the same irrational decisions. Women fight wars too. women kill just like men. everyone is capable of doing the same thing. One erson may be better that another or a few in certain areas but not entirely. one sex is not completely dominate over another or better for that matter. we will all end up six feet under with time and no one will be alive in a couple of billion years when the sun dies out. It's just a star when it goes so do we. croutonFeb 04 2005 3:04pm that's no fun at all AnonymousFeb 05 2005 2:45am WOW! Wouldn't Crouton be great at a party!? AnonymousFeb 14 2005 4:14am Women are the BEST! Women are the GREATEST! Women are SUPERIOR! Its just TRUE... humble male, the weaker sexMar 06 2005 5:13pm Eat a salad crouton! Women are the better sex. There is so much evidence in study after study that prove Women are superior.Just admire Women and get on with your life! xy = male (inferior gender)Mar 06 2005 5:19pm Most of the polls regarding gender in this site and all over the web show the same results. Most people polled agree that women are superior to men in all but a few areas. And in those areas that women are not superior - they are equal, with the possible exception of simple muscular power. And even that is a matter of proportion. Male muscle tissue has been shown to be no stronger than female muscle in absolute terms when measured fiber per fiber. In fact female muscles have proved to have superior endurance by a wide margin - over 75% better - than males. It is under a sustained load that women are superior in almost every instance. Men are also said to be better at rotating imaginary three dimensional objects (spatial awareness) but if you read the data, the male advantage in this area is actually very small. the margin of difference for things like language skills and ALL cognitive skills including ALL the biological senses favor women to a greater degree. another honest maleMar 07 2005 3:51pm oh come on stop pushing the rubish about female superior endurance If that is the case why is there no female world record holders at any of the athletics,and i know there are some female ultra marathon winners,but hardly any one does these sports,if a top class male marathon runner from kenya say moved up,they would win hands down. Im afraid until a woman BEATS a male athletic record,or throwing record,lifting record,or a female team defets a male rugby,football team,then how can you say that. I served 4 years in the british army,and believe me the female soldiers were pathetic,the fitness standrds they had to do,were DROPPRD to make up the numbers.Only a few were any good,take kelly holmes for example,a superb athlete and former soldier,but one in a thousand.And before you all slag me of,then give some real evidence of superior female endurance,other then a few ultra marathons,because as far as i can see women just cannot compete on a level playing field with men,as shown by mens dominace in every world record,and team event you care to mention. I do believe women have made huge strides,in all areas of life,but get real people it would take a thousand years before women became stronger then men,as for other areas they have made great strides in then good for them,and if men cannot compete at school or work with them,then that is not womens fault but there own ggMar 08 2005 3:42pm bollocks fredMar 08 2005 3:43pm charming man fred,bet the ladys love you being on there side ggMar 08 2005 3:44pm gg is absolutely correct except for the point about it taking 1,000 years for women to catch up physically with men. It'll take a lot longer than that if it happens at all. Until there is an evolutionary purpose for women to overtake men physically, it simply won't happen. Personally I doubt there is any evolutionary benefit for human females to outgrow human males. AnonymousMar 11 2005 2:59pm It doesn't really matter that males are bigger on the average. What matters is that women are stronger pound for pound when factors like age - training - and muscle mass are equal. At any rate - women are superior regardless of their size. they have better brains and are genetically superior. After all, we all have to come into this world through the body of a woman. Males are essentially adjuncts to the primary female organism all through nature. In fact there are quite a few species that do entirely without males. fempowerMar 12 2005 6:05pm Fempower, a question was asked on another board as to whether there would ever be a truly open bodybuilding competition that would see men and women of the same weight classes, competing equally. Do you see that happening anytime soon if ever? WowserMar 13 2005 5:36pm Wowser, The male ego is so fragile that it's unlikely there will be open competition between the sexes in bodybuilding. Consider that sports like archery and sharpshooting had been closed to women for a long time, and when women were finally admitted and began beating males they were subsequently given their own separate divisions so the men wouldn't have to deal with the shame of losing to a woman. These days girls frequently beat boys in hight school wrestling and the boys can't handle it. Some of them are so ashamed they quit wrestling entirely. I suppose that if women started beating males in bodybuilding contests you'd have a harder and harder time getting men to compete with them. I think this is due to the fact that males are basically insecure. They have a hard time dealing with their natural inferiority to women and need to establish certain activities that allow them to appear strong and confident. It's hard for men to maintain this facade if they are being shown up by women. It's usually the most macho acting men who are the most afraid of women's natural power. fempowerMar 14 2005 1:16am Fempower, yes, i see it the same way. The only salvation comes from younger guys growing up with the knowledge that women can be equal and even superior in strength. But, I doubt it will happen in my lifetime. By the way, you mentioned that girls on high school wrestling teams had beaten boys. I believe this was the primary reason for schoold beginning to establish girls' wrestling teams. A friend of mine saw one of these mixed high school matches where the girl actually pinned the boy. The boy left the mat crying. Guys have a long way to go before they can accept the idea of a woman/girl being stronger. You know, I get a kick out of these guys who write that no woman can beat them without any reference as to why they are reading this poll in the first place. They must at least be a little interested. WowserMar 14 2005 4:16pm Oops! "I believe this was the primary reason for schools beginning to establish girls' wrestling teams." Sorry about the typo. WowserMar 14 2005 4:19pm i want a superior female! nothing sexier than a firm strong woman welshboyMar 15 2005 3:16am Guess we better get used to it. peteMar 17 2005 3:16pm WOW nearly at the top of the list,need 4 more votes,weird and wacky fun though. jasonMar 18 2005 8:33am we done it top of the pile baby AnonymousMar 19 2005 4:34pm Women may be smarter in general, but it takes more than just brains to excel. There are many smart men out there as well. There are many excellent and powerful qualities of women, and statistically, they could be considered superior. But when it all comes down to it, Men have a natural drive to achieve, to lead, and to do great things. Men have a naturally powerful will and desire to push the limits. This is why there are so many male inventors and leaders, and so few females of the same. Women are smart and are good at learning and applying their skills, but when it comes to expanding the human race and moving us forward, Men are superior. It's simply an innate instinct that is not nescessarily detectable on your statistics that you are basing your claim of female superiority. ZacMar 23 2005 8:17pm Zac, It's a common misconception that there are more male inventors. There are probably at least as many female inventors and female scientists who've made great discoveries, but they don't get as much credit because of the traditional bias against women. Marie Curie - discovered radium, Ada Lovelace invented the computer punchcard in the 1800's and was the first computer programmer, Grace Hopper invented the first modern computer language (COBOL) and compiler (the A-O) which became the basis for all today's computers, Ida Henrietta Hyde invented the microelectrode, Stephanie Louise Kwolek invented Kevlar, Heddie Lamar - invented a device to encrypt radio transmissions, Bette Nesmith Graham invented liquid paper, Mary Anderson invented the windshield wiper... Just a few examples. If you do a little research you will find that there have always been many women involved in science and invention even when it was against the rules for women to do so. Oh, and one more.... Nettie Stevens (a woman) - discovered the Y chromosome! womnpwrMar 23 2005 11:25pm Still, the reason why women aren't (or weren't) in the forefront for all these years proves that men are the superior gender. It doesn't matter how statistically great someone is, if they can't apply those skills in the real world or have the drive to achieve success, they will stay where they are. Men are excellent at driving and motivating themselves and applying their skills, and that's why they have been and continue to be world leaders. ZacMar 24 2005 2:54pm Still, the reason why women aren't (or weren't) in the forefront for all these years proves that men are the superior gender. It doesn't matter how statistically great someone is, if they can't apply those skills in the real world or have the drive to achieve success, they will stay where they are. Men are excellent at driving and motivating themselves and applying their skills, and that's why they have been and continue to be world leaders. ZacMar 24 2005 2:57pm Still, the reason why women aren't (or weren't) in the forefront for all these years proves that men are the superior gender. It doesn't matter how statistically great someone is, if they can't apply those skills in the real world or have the drive to achieve success, they will stay where they are. Men are excellent at driving and motivating themselves and applying their skills, and that's why they have been and continue to be world leaders. ZacMar 24 2005 2:58pm haha, excuse the duplicates. ZacMar 24 2005 2:58pm Zac, The fact that men have been in the forefront doesn't prove that men are superior, only that they are more agressive. If agressiveness was superiority, then hyenas are superior to humans. But if we are going to define superiority based on less simplistic terms, then the cards are stacked in women's favor, even if women have been kept down by men. This is why women have been rising up from the oppression of the past. This is why, in spite of all the difficulties women have had to overcome at the hands of men, they are still able to surpass men in an increasing number of areas in society. The power of women is increasing over the long haul, and men's power is unravelling. And remember, one of the greatest motivations for men in the past has been to show off for women. So even when men have been in the limelight, it is women who have shone that light. Now that women are less interested in the achievments of males, it is only natural that we see women shining the light on themselves. For the good of society, it is time to recognise women's natural superiority. womnpwrMar 25 2005 3:35pm someone here said that women are simply caretakers and that is their 'natural role'. part of this is true but the flaw in your caveman brain which lead you to this conclusion was that you assume that women were put on this earth to make you feel comfortable. This is the same ideology used for centuries to keep women 'in their place' so they couldn't pursue any interests of their own, have their own opinion if it differed from her husband's who was practically her keeper, she was considered weak and childlike and by her very nature not fit to work or have any place in society, and her whole life revolved around her husband and children. This is called patriarchy and what we have here on this site is called feminization and change... imagine that, your ego is so fragile you can't imagine that women have a purpose and a drive (of their own) for fulfilment that doesn't completely revolve around you! You're a pig for thinking this way and I'm glad a site like this exists. It's about time people started seeing women as capable human beings and not subordinates and f***ing caretakers. And by the way, your outdated views are also very typical of a religious fundamentalist (think Islam and realize there's not much difference between you 2), where in Christianity women werre the supposed 'source of all sin,' therefore justifying a sort of 'punishment' and misogyny for much of the dark ages and much of history. please read the da vinci code and learn how patriarchal christianity had to crush egalitarian paganism (in which the 2 genders are equal and their is a god and goddess) and burn 'witches'(i.e. wise women who were given this 'evil' reputation by the Catholic church) at the stake to get rid of any opposition to one god- a man- and this new religion. also read up about mary magdalane and how modern historians believe she was actually married to Jesus but was called a whore because she refused to give in to patriarchal rule. become educated before you come here and display your utter ignorance. spreading awareness is my goal, what's yours? protecting the status quo and your precious ego from the evidence that women are just as capable as you, a man? that's not only selfish but also shows a lot of ignorance and that you are indeed still living in the past. typical. EricaApr 11 2005 12:15am This poll is really interesting. Even after you filter out the wierdness, it is worthy to note that probably most of the respondents are men and that almost 90% would say women are superior. I know in my conversations with guys about this subject, and it seems to come up more often, the guys candidly admit that women, in general, are superior. There are many exceptions of course. And we need men to keep striving and doing their best to make this a better world. But women do have a power over men that, as a woman, I like. Contented WomanApr 20 2005 10:13am Contented Woman, we like that power you have over us also. WowserApr 20 2005 8:02pm My wife is smarter and handles things with her mind better such as math, spelling, finances, and has been going to a gym to lift weights and now the last frontier she is conquering me at with a vengance is physical. She is testing her strength on me and I'm no longer stronger than her, she has muscles. RickMay 29 2005 12:59pm rick, how big are both of you? lelJun 07 2005 1:50pm all in all we are equal. lanceJun 09 2005 5:59am the average man can handle 2 women in bed,fighting,wrestling..etc. lelgtJun 10 2005 5:06am lel, I 5'10" and she is 5'8" and weighs in more by 16 lbs. She has become very strong. RickJun 11 2005 7:03pm rick, i bet she feels great in the lovin department... lelJun 14 2005 8:05am Women are superior to men! They can control men most of the time. Male bitchJun 18 2005 4:46pm i am a man..i can beat up any woman i have ever dated. i'.m 5'4" 145 lbs. how can anyone think women are superior? rodJun 19 2005 8:40pm Rod, Interesting point of view but not one I share. I mean, I never really thought about wanting to beat up a woman, whether I dated her or not. WowserJun 20 2005 1:49pm wowser..you date guys? rodJun 20 2005 2:29pm Rod, No and not what I said. I said I don't think about beating up women. WowserJun 21 2005 2:01pm women are for the superior sex..and always have been. this board though is sort of missing the picture. women are smart, patient, and yes can be trained to be stronger than a man.but a lot of women surrender this ability because they want to have children and adjust thier goals. there is nothing wrong with that. many women..as in the majority are submissive to the male. that is an instinct thing because women need the man for child birth(i'm not questioning modern science) but for people on this board to act like men have kept women down..or women have just discovered this fact..is baloney. women will always favor having a man to share life with..and in most cases the male will be dominant. tkp dudeJun 25 2005 8:13am Way to go Mariah! man bitchJul 09 2005 3:24pm Donna, you are absolutely correct! You Women are superior to us men! Women RuleJul 09 2005 3:30pm men are the boss. women do as they are instructed..and yes they are good at following orders. 1 man can boss 250 women..and not 1 woman would ever consider going toe to toe with him. now think about that? even a group of women will back down to a smaller older male. pure truth be knownJul 11 2005 9:21am men are superior gabJul 15 2005 1:42pm Women rule men, but some men are just too stupid to realize it! submissive guyJul 23 2005 5:23pm Wussies and male failures like submissive guy should be stripped of his citizenship and put into a camp where all he has to do is do the dishes and pull on his pud. Your such a loser. RandyJul 26 2005 9:23pm Guys like randy will never change,but the younger ones will have grown up,besides these girls and will be used to seeing women beating men at most things,so it will not be seen as someting strange or weird,like some guys seem to today.What i love is how men still deny it,yet everywhere you look women,are working away hard,and overtaking men.In the uk they dominate medical,law,vets, schools as well as education,also middle management is pretty much female dominated,and they start up more new companys then men.Also this week it has been reported women in the uk,are richer then men from the ages of 18-44yrs old,and by 2025 will have the bulk of the money.Better just get used to it guys,you can fight it,but most men it seems are not,or just aint up to it. chrisJul 27 2005 4:33pm To true chris.What line of work are you in randy? Maybe you are in a pretty much male dominated work place.But these seem to be getting less and less as time goes by.Some guys here do take it a bit to far,and by the time i am dead(hopefully a long time yet) i doubt women will have taking over.But you cannot fail to deny they are fast making up ground,and in plenty of areas gone past men.Why would that worry you,are you telling me you have never worked for,or met a man who you hate,or pisses you of.So what would the difference be if a woman who may be better in charge,told you what to do. As long as they dont take the piss, i dont care.And oh i work in an office that is at least 70% female,and yet i have no problems with it at all jakeJul 27 2005 4:39pm What the f*ck is this poo? Exactly how are women superior? Because they give birth? Well guess what honey, your dad could have blown that load in your mom's face rather then her vagina. And men aren't superior either. Men cannot exist without women and vice versa. HKKAug 01 2005 9:01pm women are very adaptable.the fact that men are normally stronger..is because women take care of men and children. if a woman decides to be strong or independant..look out! i am just happy my woman lets me be myself lanceAug 15 2005 10:24am Check out the view of michael buerk about how todays society is becoming increasinly a female one. Michael Buerk, the veteran BBC newsreader, has launched a tirade against what he believes is the all-pervading influence of women in society, claiming that men have been reduced to little more than "sperm donors". Buerk, the former presenter of The Nine O'Clock News whose report on Ethiopia inspired Live Aid, said that life was now lived "according to women's rules" and that traditional male traits had been marginalised. In an interview with The Radio Times, he cited the decline of the manual workforce as an example of the trend as well as the number of women in top jobs at the BBC and other media outlets. Buerk, who now presents BBC World and recently attacked some of his fellow news presenters for being overpaid "lame brains", complained that the "shift in the balance of power between the sexes" has gone too far and we needed to "admit the problem". "Life is now being lived according to women's rules," he said. "The traits that have traditionally been associated with men - reticence, stoicism, single-mindedness - have been marginalised. "The result is that men are becoming more like women. Look at the men who are being held up as sporting icons - David Beckham and, God forbid, Tim Henman." Buerk cited females in the top jobs in the BBC as an example, saying "these are the people who decide what we see and hear". He said: "Look at the changes in the workplace. There is no manufacturing industry any more; there are no mines; few vital jobs require physical strength. "We have lots of jobs that require people skills and multi-tasking - which women are a lot better at." The newsreader, who will also air his views on a new Channel Five series called Don't Get Me Started! is gaining a reputation for grumbling. As well as criticising his fellow presenters he also attacked London winning the Olympic Games claiming it would lead to "years of misery". He said some changes had been for the good, but added: "What are the men left with? All they are is sperm donors, and most women aren't going to want an unemployable sperm donor loafing around and making the house look untidy. "They are choosing not to have a male in the household." Buerk said that when he started making the programme he "came across what I considered a very personal example of the changes that have taken place". He said: "Almost all the big jobs in broadcasting were held by women - the controllers of BBC1 television and Radio 4 for example." chrisAug 17 2005 9:54am chris..but women are so good in bed! horn dogAug 19 2005 4:50am true chrisAug 26 2005 4:35pm Lotsof people are saying that women will take over because there are more in higher education. But just because women study doesn't mean they actually become doctors, lawyers, etc. I wonder how many marry after they graduate and stay home, and let their husbands carry on their careers. There's a big difference between going to university and gaining social power afterwards. Women have been telling us for years that they have equal rights, but they're still complaining they're still treated as the second sex. Why? because WOMEN GO ALONG WITH IT. There's no better proof of their inferiority than that women choose it. They let their husbands tell them what to do. They dress and act as sex objects. They get jobs as strippers. Girls compalin that men still call the shots but they let it happen. So who's the superior sex? AnonymousAug 29 2005 11:41am Women are smarter than men, Women are stronger than men, Women live longer than men, Women have basically defeated the men. Now men have to admit it, first to themselves, then to their Women! C'mon guys admit it! memberofthesecondgenderamanAug 30 2005 10:37am Yes but having more education,and the proper qualifications will mean higher paid jobs,and positions,unless there is a major change in that,so with women dominating education,then they will surly take up the bulk of managers in the future. peteSep 07 2005 9:04am Mainly because of reverse descrimination, which the liberal bastards are rationalizing and justifying by calling it affirmative action. ANY ONLY THAT REASON RandySep 13 2005 1:22pm For the memberofthesesecondgenerationman. Just because you feel as though you are inferior doesn't mean the rest of us do. I will admit nothing. I never achieved anything through handouts. Whatever I achieved in life I earned. I will not be made to feel guilty about that. Oh, by the way! Did you mistress order you to write that or do even have permission to speak for yourself??????? RandySep 13 2005 1:24pm Mainly because of reverse descrimination, which the liberal bastards are rationalizing and justifying by calling it affirmative action. ANY ONLY THAT REASON RandySep 13 2005 1:25pm oh come on randy,girls through hard work,are creaming boys in schools,the boys are droping out of higher education in record numbers,so i for one give girls credit for working hard,and aiming for the skys,maybe boys need to wake up to the competition,and stop making excuses,just like you are. jjSep 14 2005 4:32pm todays date 9-19-05 a guestSep 19 2005 3:34pm Women are neither superior to or inferior to men. What I love the most about this debate is that we are finally (not me - I knew this long ago) discovering that women are not inferior in any way to males. Many are physically stronger than men. Many are smarter than men. But for too long women were expected to be surbordinate to the male. Obey the husband. Like the man is some kind of king. Today women earn more than men in many cases. It is just proper compensation for their abioities. My woman earns more than me and I am so proud of her for that. She is a physically strong woman with a sharp intellect who is not shy about aserting herself. I admire all those traits of hers. She is quite special. I could no more be with a demure and uncapable woman again ever. I have found great joy being with this wonderful woman. Men - open your eyes and enjoy the company of a beautiful, accomplishd woman like I do. Before we met she told me of all the men who were put off by her. Many men felt intimidated by her. I don't. I love to be in her company precisely because she is so gifted. She brings a wealth of talent, beauty and grace to this relationship simply because of who she is and her abilities. One of her abilities is to physically dominate me. I'm sure some men are afraid of that. I embrace it but that is the subject for another poll and the responses. Rocks In My HeadSep 21 2005 8:58am There was no option for EQUAL in this poll, so I didn't vote. EddieSep 26 2005 2:46pm eddie - great call! Daniel (uk)Oct 04 2005 6:03am Probably because there is no option. richOct 07 2005 12:21pm Lots of guys here on this board like to be the submissive part in a relationship. I think this is more common than you can first think in the male dominated society we live in. These men have come to grips that they need to have a strong woman by their side. And for women too many of us are afraid to show our strength. Far too many women let their boyfriends/husbands/sons win different kinds of contests just to boost their egos. It is about time that people realize that their are plenty of strong women around, both mentally and physically. I always believed I was physically stronger than my husband but was afraid that this would scare him away when we started to date so I pretended to be weaker. I let him win when we playwrestled, arm wrestled and played tennis. I even let him win when we were playing card games etc. One day I just had enough of my own behaviour. I challanged him at different physically activities and won them all. He was shocked for a while after that but soon accepted his new role as the physical inferiour part in our relationship. Our marriage has become stronger because of this. I make most decisions without being too bossy, I carry the heavy suitcases, I am on top in bed. And we love it that way. MaryOct 27 2005 11:44pm Female supremacy is the Natural order of life. Women are naturally superior to males and now without males artifically keeping Women down they will rise to their rightful place as the leaders of society. JRNov 07 2005 12:59pm Well, obviously this page shows that women are hollow men. Stuffed men. It's not easy being a man and having soul and wisdom. It's the natural condition for males, but our society actually favors females in a biased and unnatural way. When this happens the only hope for humanity is lost. It's important for men reading this to let go of "female superior" beliefs, (other than sexual fantasies of limited scope), because they will be cheating theirselves and the rest of us, including women, out of the benefit, nay, necessity, of humanity. SCNov 11 2005 3:51pm Mary, i don't believe you are honest. Probably you're a man who trolls web pages about female superiority because it gets him off. There are some, but it's only a fantasy because it's so incongruous with reality. REALITY. Not just a fake social norm. Besides, if your husband is weaker, it's a rarety. Definitely not the norm. So what. I don't say this because i feel men have to be superior, only that it's disgusting touting shallow, unfounded, manipulative slogans in an attempt to pilfer something from someone else. Yuck. Get ye gone, whatever you are! SCNov 11 2005 3:59pm Since the author of this post did not include an option to vote for neither sex being superior, I could not vote. However, I can reply since the majority of these posts imply that women are superior in every way. Every time that I find an instance proving otherwise I will post it. Lisa Lynette Clark, 37, was charged with having "relations" with a fifteen-year-old boy, to whom she is now married and is having a child with. Statutory rape works both ways. Real superior I must say. I realize that a lot of people will rationalize that it is just one case, but it is a sign that women behave just like men do and if you research it everyday, you can find an instance everyday. Well, women wanted to prove that they are equal to men. Well you have, for both good and bad, you have proved it. SPNov 15 2005 8:26am SP, Using a glaring example of a woman who abused a child does nothing to change the fact that 9 out of ten violent criminal acts are done by men. There are billions of people in the world, so of course you will find lots of cases of women doing terrible things. But when you add it up, there is no question that men are waaay more destructive and violent than women. Anyone who can't see that is fooling themselves. clarityNov 17 2005 11:43am A woman is just mouth, tits, ass, c*nt and thighs. Who can seriously argue that the superior sex is the one that has always done the cooking, cleaning, and served male pleasure? The female chauvinist bitches voting for girls on top live in a fantasy world. AnonymousNov 21 2005 6:29pm Females are NOT stronger, well all know that much for sure. As for women taking over the world? They don't *all* have the will to try... and it would take all of them and not just a few hardcore ones on this board. GuestDec 16 2005 1:37am Women are weak and dumb by nature they are good only pleasing men and making babies without the help of men women are NOTHING. If someday cience develop a artificial womb women will loose their utility. Well, they will continue to be usefull as delicious sex toys. Marcelo RatzJan 20 2006 11:48am Seems there is alot of very insecure males here. Just admit it guys, women are the better sex. There is abundant evidence in many studies that prove it. The very fact that all human life begins as female for the first 6 weeks is proof enough. Maleness is really an "accident" of the normal developement of a female. Therefore "maleness" is really somewhat of a birth defect, remember in biology X doesn't equal y. The X chromosome is the essence of femaleness and is superior the the y chromosome, maleness. In fact, the y chromosome is really a broken in half X chromosome and is in a permanent state of decline, evidence of male fragility and inferiority. The males in this forum can scream amd curse all they want, but it doesn't change the fact of feminine superiority. JMGJan 20 2006 11:50pm The only men who would agree that women are superior are perverted, submissive wierdos. Men are definitely the superior sex, mentally as well as physically. That's why this planet has been dominated by men for 10,000 years. Logic gives way to emotion in women and therefore something that is so simple becomes overcomplicated for them. Often, they become some so consumed with a mindless issue that they can't function on anything else. The ability to overly focus or peseverate is not a sign of intelligence, ladies! If a women gets consumed with a certain thought, they can't accomplish anything else until they have closure. Men, on the other hand, can have sex dreams, think about sports and still complete the task at hand. Women are great worker bees, but rarely can think out of the box. And this business about handling finances, etc.. is just silly. We men have women take care of those mundane tasks because we don't want to be bothered. And in a situation like that even though the women have all the information at their fingertips, they still overspend and blow the household budget and say things like "I thought there was enough money!", while a man can grasp such situations without even having to look at the details. In short, women are detail oriented because they have to be; a man's superior intelligence allows him to be able to coast, where a women has to buckle down and focus. This is no contest; that's the reason the world is male-dominated. RogerJan 30 2006 3:03pm not for much longer mate.They dominate education and will be a clear majority in all exam results and boys seem to be failing to fight any more,they are leaving higher education in droves,many sadly without any exam results.So who do you think will get the jobs requiring a degree in the future,and what are the under educated boys going to do,when the odds are there new boss will be a bright young highly educated female.Whats the point of talking about the past,its over,the future will be if not female dominated then at least 50-50,get used to it. chrisFeb 02 2006 5:06pm chris, that's your hormones talking... once you jack-off, you're back to normal. MikeomaticFeb 03 2006 5:47pm Camden, N.J. - Vanessa Jackson was sentenced to seven years in prison after being convicted for child endangerment of her four adopted sons, including starving them. Look it up.... Female superiority at its best! A righteous manFeb 11 2006 4:16pm And before anyone claims it is an isolated case, don't bother. Women are doing this more and more all the time. Indeed you are equal to men, not superior. A righteous manFeb 11 2006 4:17pm Don't let isolated cases have much weight when you are seeking the truth of an entire world. Tests have shown women are better at too many things for female superiory not to be true. Women are simply superior. Argue to the contrary if you feel you must, if it makes you feel like a strong man, but women have better stamina, endurace, senses, brains and memory and so on. Research the truth and accept it. STTGFeb 12 2006 12:09pm What tests? Name them, name them all. Don't make me do the research. You're the one whose claiming that all these tests are proving female superiority, when all the posts claiming female superiority are either by submissive males with no identity of their own, men who have been guilted into believing that everything that bad happens to women is their fault, or by women who are so unbelievably arrogant, that they aren't willing or capable that they are indeed equal to men, just like the women's movement has always claimed that they wanted. Tests? Baloney. Most every post by people talking about studies and tests fail to mention which particular test or study that they are referring to. By the way, I don't let tests determine the quality of relationship that I have with people. Maybe arrogant individuals who believe in female or male superiority feel comfortable in their believes, but I am a man who believes that the term superiority is used and has been used throughout the ages that has done so much damage to humanity that it may be next to impossible to ever fix it. Reversing it is not the answer. And as far as your childish response that I need to argue to the contrary to feel like a strong man is simply that. A statement without merit or intelligent thought. Again, Vanessa Jackson was not an isolated case. More and more of these women are coming out each day. You know it too! You just don't want to admit the truth, that women can be just as bad as men, and now that they are getting more power, they are showing it. A righteous manFeb 13 2006 7:15am thru and thru the battle of the sexs continus justsomebunnyFeb 15 2006 7:10pm women are smarter males are stronger brute an brain brain an brute becuz i seeFeb 15 2006 7:13pm Great, now we're putting the fate of the entire human race on Yahoo Groups, a group founded more than likely by a cronic masturabator who likes being dominated by women. OH MY GOD!!!!! A righeous manFeb 19 2006 12:13pm Weakness is death. Yes, I'm a man. And Proud of it. TufuFeb 23 2006 12:55am Lisa Lynnette Clark, the 37-year-old woman who raped and then married her 15-year-old victim, is now facing the prospect of losing her man child. If this is an example of female superiority, you can keep it. I am proud to be a righteous man. A righteous manFeb 24 2006 3:28pm righteous, Sure, use a rare example of a Woman engaging in a despicable sexual act as if that comes close to the rampant abuse perpetuated by the male population. Just more male ignorance of the truth. You may indeed be a righteous man, but you'd be even more righteous if you could accept the rsality that Women are superior to men. womnpwrMar 01 2006 1:31pm women are the superior sex in every way womnontopMar 11 2006 2:41am Legally men are the superior sex and if Alito and Bush get their way (and it appears they will), we are about to get a little more superior. Let's keep the bitches down where they belong! AnonymousMar 14 2006 3:46pm whats better..a king or queen? of course men are superior! lelgtMar 16 2006 9:34am eh what the stuff is that meant to prove? How many countrys still have a king or queen today? What ever any one thinks the simple truth is that girls are slaughtering boys in education all over the western world,and from the evidence ive read also in lots of other places to.Which if the normal trend,that having degrees means still,girls will go on to take the better payed jobs,already in the uk over 60%of new lawyers are female,also doctors as well.So what ever happens and whatever you believe,in the future uk courts and hospitals chances are you will be seeing a female in charge,like it or lump it. DizzyDaveMar 24 2006 4:13pm Though i for one feel men will always be far stronger then women on average,due to body size etc,but still its pretty scary to see what is going on with the boys today,they all seem so sloppy and poor at everything,while the girls are forging ahead and taking the chances there in front of them. DizzyDaveMar 24 2006 4:16pm Yo, womnpwr....Wake up! Stop making excuses. Why do you rationalize and justify in women, what women find repulsive in men? It is not a RARE example like to believe, but happens everyday. Read the papers, watch the news, violence in women is on the upswing and it is not just because they live in a male dominated society. It's also because some women, a lot of women, are just plain evil, just like men. And you have to watch out for those people who always claim to be superior because more often than not, it is just the opposte. A righteous manMar 25 2006 5:10pm To: A righteous man Why can't you google "women are better" and "women have better" and then replace the word "better" with "superior". Just skip past the joke sites and "women are better than guitars" sites and learn the scientific truth: Women, as a whole, are superior. Better language skills, better at multi-tasking, better stamina, better learners, they make better bosses, they have superior memory, they do better in facial recognition tests, they can identify emotions twice as fast as men, the live longer, they mature faster. Some even have better senses of taste, touch and smell.. I can go on and on and on, but so can you, just stop believing one gender HAS to be equal to the other. There is no scientific reason to expect this and the evidence is clearly showing women are superior. Many men and women know this, not just men with submissive tendancies. STTGApr 09 2006 10:06am And yes, some women do commit crimes. Fact is, studies show women are better liars too! And some women do lie. This doesn't change the fact that women are superior. Men commit the vast majority of crimes, so the odd female crime doesn't alter the fact that women, as a whole, are better, superior, kinder, gentler and stronger. This is not a contradiction. A women may love her man, make him her slave, but still love and respect him. She is far less likely to do violence on him and if the relationship is healthy, he will always have the choice to leave. STTGApr 09 2006 10:13am I pity anyone (M or F) who has to work for a female boss. AnonymousApr 10 2006 8:30pm Dear Gwen, I like the idea of having your husband wear a skirt suit (and of course a dress). You should encourage your male employees to wear skirt suits too. Lipstick would also be nice. PatrickApr 12 2006 5:11am To: Anonymous Regarding: I pity anyone (M or F) who has to work for a female boss. I think you may pity them because they can't pull the wool over her eyes or get away with things. Many studies have shown women make better bosses, are better at communicating expectations, etc. And women are now becoming aware of male shortcomings and are raising the bar by expecting female performance levels from both men and women. Better get used to it as more bosses will be female. Eventually men will be paid less as its understood the inferior gender can't accomplish as much a woman in the same job. And then the expectations will be sized according to gender. STTGApr 12 2006 3:44pm Yo, STTG! Why do you and all these masqueraders do that? Cut all "studies prove" crap out....The only thing that makes women "superior" is affirmative action (reverse DISCRIMINATION). Women do not have better language skills, they are not better at multi-tasking, they do not have better stamina, do not make better learners, they do not make better bosses, do not have superior memory, they do not do better in facial recognition tests,blah, blah, blah...Women were the ones whining about equality all of this time, now that they taste power, it goes straight to their heads. Every woman should have the middle name of hypocrite on their birth certificates. You get all of your evidence from made up studies. Not one study has ever proven anything one way or another. They just waste time and money. Oh, and by the way..... Natalie Rodriguez was sentenced to life in prison for cutting the throat of her long time friend's 9 MONTH old child, simply because she was evicted from her apartment. Sounds like a great reason for killing a baby. If a man did that, he would automatically be labeled a monster. A woman does it and I'm sure that you will all try and find an excuse for it. Women are equal to men, and female violence is rising rapidly every year. And you don't need studies for that, just the facts with arrest records. Anyone who claims superiority, is actually inferior, and that is a fact. There is your female superiority for you. A Righteous ManApr 12 2006 5:15pm Amanda Hamm....Conspired with her boyfriend to drowned her three children much like Susan Smith did to her children. Google it up folks and that's where you'll find your female superiority. A Righteous ManApr 12 2006 7:11pm Pamela Rogers 28, a woman who spent six months in prison for having sex with a 13-year-old, was rearrested for communicating with him. There's your female superiority for you A Righteous ManApr 12 2006 7:18pm Come on folks, let's hear the excuses you have for these women. A Righteous ManApr 12 2006 7:19pm A think Righteous man needs a Righteous Woman to show him what's what. StevenApr 15 2006 6:23am Since women are so superior, let THEM fight the wars while us weak and stupid men stay home and enjoy life without women. Contrary to popular belief, us men can be very happy without sex. Being away from women helps us to focus our minds and find real meaning. Kung Fu MasterApr 15 2006 9:52pm I hate the word superior and inferior, and try to look at people for who they are as human beings and not the package they were born with. I do want to point out to A Righteous Man that although he can come up with an example a day about how evil some women can be, I could probably come up with about twenty five or more about the evil things that men do, just by reading the paper. Get some help Righteous Man. StevenApr 16 2006 5:29am Oh, Kung Fu Master. I think the point that some people are trying to make when they say that women are superior is that they don't cause wars, so if they are superior, it is because men cause and fight in wars. Why is that always the argument with some men? "If they want't to be equal to men, let them fight the wars!" It's a stale argument that has never had any merit to it. StevenApr 16 2006 5:32am to: A Righteous Man. You're in denial BIG TIME. But I am impressed you actually took the time to negate all the ways women are superior. I'm sure your seeing it in writing makes you feel better but facts are facts and one day when you've lived long enough you'll realize female superiority is not a lie, it's the truth and denying it doesn't change the truth. Get back to me when you've lived past the age of 30 and have read more and witnessed more. Next time you get a cold, count the days you're sick. Then compare to a female of the same age. Then expand this study ten times and you'll see more "truth". STTGApr 17 2006 3:11pm I am making an open invitation to strong wives/girlfriends to tell their stories and for the husbands/boyfriends to respond. I am researching for a possible feature documentary on the way women are becoming physically stronger and fitter and being more the dominant partner. I need couples or singles to be honest and open about their relationships and possibly appear on film recounting their stories. Would be nice to hear from any interested parties. I and the film company are based in the UK but will look to source any stories or experiences in Europe, USA or elsewhere. My email address is dflexer01@hotmail.com - look forward to hearing from anyone with an interesting story. Thank you for your attention. Daniel uk (21/04/06)Apr 22 2006 12:06am Excuse me STTG! But, I don't whine about getting colds. When I get one, I don't try to compare my "suffering" against other people. I simply go to the store, purchase the appropriate medicine(s), and take care of myself. That also applies to doing my own housework, paying my bills, and generally getting along with other people, male or female. I am a human being, I have my faults, of which I freely confess, but I am not about to admit to being inferior because you have such a good time making up facts just to make yourself feel better about being a domineering female, or a submissive man, whoever you might be. I haven't read enough of your posts to know either way. Anyway, have a good day. Oh, and by the way, I do a great job of wiping my own ass as well. Don't me to be too graphic, but apparently you don't think men can do that by themselves. A Righteous ManApr 23 2006 12:27pm And as a reply to your post about women making better liars and such. The reason why men commit more crimes is because we have held power longer. As women gain more power, you will see them acting the same way men do. I don't need any made up studies like you do in order to prove my point. I simply look around me and see what the truth is. Women are no better or worse than men. Women ARE equal to men, just like the women's liberation movement continues to strive for. It is just feminazis and submissive wimps with no backbones who try and find the truth in VARIATIONS magazines. A Righteous ManApr 23 2006 12:31pm Im the superior sex. And I am not man or woman Michael JacksonMay 01 2006 4:03am Women should be wearing miniskirts as often as possible: At work, school, shopping, public events, etc. And get rid of those irritating SLEEVES! Women should be showing arms, shoulders and back. This business of women wearing sleeves and long pants is GARBAGE !! He ManMay 01 2006 10:12pm Males should all be shirtless and be required to have nipple rings and be led around by Women. She WomanMay 02 2006 5:05pm If women rule, then the world is doomed. All women (even the good ones) all have this arrogant belief that they should not be held accountable for what they do. Nothing is ever there fault. It is truly amazing that they all don't have the same middle name of hypocrite. A Righteous ManMay 03 2006 8:26pm This post is addressed to the man or woman who posted that picture of a woman drowning a man. I'm glad that you did that, it displays the true violent nature of women, they can never solve their problems without violence. DaveMay 03 2006 8:28pm If women rule, then the world is doomed. All women (even the good ones) all have this arrogant belief that they should not be held accountable for what they do. Nothing is ever there fault. It is truly amazing that they all don't have the same middle name of hypocrite. A Righteous ManMay 03 2006 8:28pm I can give you in two words a reason why women are no better than men and are not superior. Those two words are: PARIS HILTON. The argument is settled. I have won. A Righteous ManMay 08 2006 8:32am george bush adolf hitler 99% of all serial killers now ive won A normal guyMay 10 2006 3:25pm Let's see, the woman you come up with as proof that women are not superior, is Paris Hilton. Well here are some men who prove that women ARE superior to men: Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini, Francisco Franco, Ferdinand Marcos, Nicolae Ceausecu, Augusto Pinochet, Papa Doc Duvalier, Idi Amin, Kim Il Sung, Pol Pot, and Saddam Hussein. The argument is settled. Women have won. AnonymousMay 12 2006 7:24pm The argument is not settled, women have not woman, and as long as there are blind people like you, no one will ever win. But, I have more proof that women are not superior. Since there is so much information on them, that it would take too much time to put in here, you can Google them and find out for yourself, but it is obvious to me, that you are not interested in being fair, but just in case, here goes: Lizzie Borden, Audrey Marie Hilley, Valeria Messalina, Agrippina the Younger, Tz'U-HSI, Catherine the Great, Queen Ranavalaona, Elena Ceausescu, Mary Ann Cotton, Marie Noe, Rose West, Grace Marks, Aileen Carol Wuornos, Myra Hindley, Karla Homolka, Leona Helmsley, Martha Stewart, Countess Elizabeth Bathory. If that isn't enough, I'll add one more for you: Theresa L Anderson 29, charged with beating up a 9-year-old disabled boy on a bus. She later claimed that she beat him and laughed about it because she thought the boy who had development difficulty was a brat. Google that too, I'm sure you'll find it. Not that I expect you to even try and be fair, but who knows? Weirder things have happened. But, I'm almost certain that you'll try and come up with any excuse for these evil women. A Righteous ManMay 13 2006 11:04am By the way, I'm aware of my mistake where say woman have not woman. You all know I meant to say, women have not won. A Righteous ManMay 13 2006 11:05am By the way, leave it to a woman to name Nicolae Ceausescu without mentioning his evil sidekick. HIW WIFE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! A Righteous ManMay 13 2006 11:06am By the way, I'm aware of my mistake where say woman have not woman. You all know I meant to say, women have not won. A Righteous ManMay 13 2006 11:06am The argument is not settled, women have not woman, and as long as there are blind people like you, no one will ever win. But, I have more proof that women are not superior. Since there is so much information on them, that it would take too much time to put in here, you can Google them and find out for yourself, but it is obvious to me, that you are not interested in being fair, but just in case, here goes: Lizzie Borden, Audrey Marie Hilley, Valeria Messalina, Agrippina the Younger, Tz'U-HSI, Catherine the Great, Queen Ranavalaona, Elena Ceausescu, Mary Ann Cotton, Marie Noe, Rose West, Grace Marks, Aileen Carol Wuornos, Myra Hindley, Karla Homolka, Leona Helmsley, Martha Stewart, Countess Elizabeth Bathory. If that isn't enough, I'll add one more for you: Theresa L Anderson 29, charged with beating up a 9-year-old disabled boy on a bus. She later claimed that she beat him and laughed about it because she thought the boy who had development difficulty was a brat. Google that too, I'm sure you'll find it. Not that I expect you to even try and be fair, but who knows? Weirder things have happened. But, I'm almost certain that you'll try and come up with any excuse for these evil women. A Righteous ManMay 13 2006 11:06am If I hear one more person carp about how men having been abusing women for centuries I'm going to scream!!! I am not going to be judged guilty for what other people have done. Blow your arguement out of your asses! DaveMay 13 2006 2:29pm There has never been a study that has shown any conclusive proof on anything, pro or con. Studies are done in order to waste taxpayers money, but people with nothing better to do. Studies do not prove that women make better bosses. I have had male bosses and female bosses, and perfer no one over the other on the basis of sex. I prefered some bosses, because of merit. Merit, do you remember that ladies. It was what you were all screaming about. Hire me on merit, nothing else. You have seemed to have lost touch with cause. A Righteous ManMay 13 2006 2:38pm Clarity, my point is, that as women gain more power, they will abuse it more, and that nine to one ratio you point out will shrink. Violence in girls is growing at a faster rate than boys, and it is because of environment although I know that feminazis want to believe that it is from testosterone, which by the way is not soley a male hormone. It is in women as well. If women take over, as this post and others suggest that it is only a matter of time, the world won't be a perfect place like you brag about. What a disappointment that will be to all of you who love living in a fantasy world. A Righteous ManMay 13 2006 2:44pm Well i think you are wrong when you say that studys dont prove anything, i bet if men won these studys you would use them as an example of male superiority.By the way mate,new reports this week show that in america boys have falling even further behind in exam results.And i fail to see how its just lazy guys,and they are sure in for a shock when they see all the next generation of managers are going to be female.Women dominante medical,law schools,they gain more degrees then men now,just who do you think will take over form the older men when they retire? I fail to see why you keep saying women will be as bad as men, i doubt that very much,but then we have never seen a female dominated society so we will see i guess.If one looks at sweden as an example the most equal country in the world,then i think women having power will be very good.They have a high standard of living,and low crime rates,and i dont think they have been involved in a war in ages,bar some peace keeping dutys.And yet women make up near 50% of managers and mps in that country,and will know doubt be the first country to have a majority of female leaders and bosses very soon.Any way i dont care who rules over me,as long as they are fair about it,something a lot of male leaders are anything but. samMay 14 2006 4:48pm My wife is older than me, better educated, make more money and is quite a bit stronger physically than me BUT I can cook better than her, I have a closer relationship with our three kids (girls), I can run longer than her. Does this make me less of a man? Or her less of a woman? We have a happy relationship and we don't really care that our relationship is not the "normal" one according to our society. I am stronger than some of my male friends meaning that my wife is stronger than them. They have big difficulties with that, I think it's funny. The ManMay 14 2006 11:40pm I think it's wonderful. And clearly it's becoming more common. AnonymousMay 15 2006 7:06am They should not allow people to post here, with just the name Anonymous. It is a cowardly signature. PeterMay 23 2006 8:07am Yes and using a first name is very brave AnonymousMay 24 2006 5:54pm Haha! Yes there are only several million "Peters" in the world. FYI "Anonymous" is not a "signature." It is the default that automatically prints when you decline to create a false name or nom de plume. Everyone here is "Anonymous" unless you print your real full name, plus your address and email. Creating a false name or using an extremely common first name only, doesn't make you any less anonymous now does it? Oh and my name is Peter too. Peter jr.May 24 2006 11:17pm www.likelike.com/poll.elephant?poll_id=2550 AnonymousMay 25 2006 2:45pm I see your point Peter Jr. I also see no point in even wasting my time on these femdom boards anymore. I'm sorry if I felt as though knowing at least what another person's first name identity seems odd and unrealistic to you, but my name is truly Peter and my opinions are truly my own. PeterMay 28 2006 10:09am To STTG. A slave is someone you own. When you deliberately take away someone's identity and selfworth simply because you are power mad and egomaniacal, then you don't not love and respect them. Your comment that studies show that women make better liars too, totally flies in the face of the comments that a lot of these female supremacists make when they say that women are more honest than men. Keep making those comments you are making, and you will keep proving that women are not superior to men, just better rationalizers. PeterMay 28 2006 10:13am Add a comment: Vote Results |
